On the public citation graph

Preference-based deontic logic (PDL)

0 signed · 53 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8511-7_14openalex-snapshot
Ein Paradoxienfreies Deontisches System
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8484-4openalex-snapshot
New Studies in Deontic Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8484-4_5openalex-snapshot
Hierarchies of Regulations and their Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2191-3openalex-snapshot
Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3146-2_1openalex-snapshot
Deontic Logic: An Introduction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00147111openalex-snapshot
Two approaches to deontic logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00226382openalex-snapshot
Semantic analyses of normative concepts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00373715openalex-snapshot
The logic of practical ?ought?-sentences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00484978openalex-snapshot
Fundamental axioms for preference relations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01239128openalex-snapshot
A new semantical approach to the logic of preference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1913866openalex-snapshot
Collective Choice and Social Welfare
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2215390openalex-snapshot
Deontic Logic and The Priority of Moral Theory

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.352openalex-snapshot
Obligations and Permissions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49545-2_6openalex-snapshot
Prohairetic Deontic Logic (PDL)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1488-8_12openalex-snapshot
How to Combine Ordering and Minimizing in a Deontic Logic based on Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03487-0_1openalex-snapshot
Intensional Logic and Semantics for Deontic Modals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06164-7_8openalex-snapshot
Norms and Deontic Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88708-7_6openalex-snapshot
Weighted Modal Logic in Epistemic and Deontic Contexts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08615-6_12openalex-snapshot
“Sing and Dance!”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09764-0_8openalex-snapshot
How to Build Input/Output Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_30openalex-snapshot
Preference Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97755-3_1openalex-snapshot
Deontic Logic and Changing Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25927-5_13openalex-snapshot
Quasi-matrix Deontic Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53737-0_1openalex-snapshot
Compensatory Fuzzy Logic: A Frame for Reasoning and Modeling Preference Knowledge in Intelligent Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1344-4_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8851-5_5openalex-snapshot
The Many Faces of Defeasibility in Defeasible Deontic Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1743-4_14openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Normative Reasoning under Uncertainty: How to Distinguish between Obligations under Uncertainty and Prima Facie Obligations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370669openalex-snapshot
Prima facie and seeming duties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370671openalex-snapshot
Contrary-to-duty obligations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00372359openalex-snapshot
The revenger's paradox
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00666230openalex-snapshot
Similarity semantics and minimal changes of belief
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01083166openalex-snapshot
Changes in preference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9475-5openalex-snapshot
Preferences in artificial intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-025-09798-3openalex-snapshot
Mīmāṃsā on ‘better-not’ Permissions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02249-wopenalex-snapshot
Beyond Preferences in AI Alignment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1874-5857(06)80029-4openalex-snapshot
Deontic logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s001221730001132xopenalex-snapshot
A Resolution of Wollheim's Paradox
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004233913104openalex-snapshot
Situationist Deontic Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018975332469openalex-snapshot
Contrary‐to‐duty reasoning with preference‐based dyadic obligations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/b:stud.0000034182.95695.cbopenalex-snapshot
A New Representation Theorem for Contranegative Deontic Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08066200050505788openalex-snapshot
Multiplex semantics for deontic logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exab022openalex-snapshot
Logic of defeasible permission and its dynamics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exab088openalex-snapshot
Modelling Ceteris Paribus Preferences with Deontic Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00714.xopenalex-snapshot
Normative Conflicts and The Logic of ‘Ought’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2020/33openalex-snapshot
A Preference-Based Approach to Defeasible Deontic Inference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-1469openalex-snapshot
A Formal Approach to Identify Inconsistencies in Stakeholder Needs in the Context of Systems Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v6i0.1800openalex-snapshot
An abstract approach to reasoning about games with mistaken and changing beliefs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aic-130560openalex-snapshot
Using norms to control open multi-agent systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aic-2011-0502openalex-snapshot
Open issues for normative multi-agent systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/ia-221057openalex-snapshot
How to model contrary-to-duty with GCP-nets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/systems7040055openalex-snapshot
Theoretical Foundations for Preference Representation in Systems Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.47749/t/unicamp.2008.433996openalex-snapshot
Dilemas deonticos
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4995/thesis/10251/17800openalex-snapshot
Using Norms To Control Open Multi-Agent Systems
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.