On the public citation graph
Contingency and modal logic
0 signed · 51 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/10992.1573-0433openalex-snapshot
Journal of Philosophical Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0145-0_16openalex-snapshot
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00245925openalex-snapshot
Model theory for modal logic part I?The De re/de dicto distinction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00201746008601312openalex-snapshot
Logical necessity, physical necessity, ethics, and quantifiers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198243113.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Past, Present and Future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1963.tb00803.xopenalex-snapshot
ACTA PHILOSOPHICA FENNICA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/412917openalex-snapshot
Formal philosophy: selected papers of Richard Montague. Edited and with an introduction by Richmond H. Thomason. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974. Pp. 368. $12.50.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3517-5openalex-snapshot
Representational Content and the Objects of Thought
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3517-5_6openalex-snapshot
Against Necessary Existence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01052533openalex-snapshot
Twenty-five basic theorems in situation and world theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-024-09755-6openalex-snapshot
Some Ways the Ways the World Could Have Been Can’t Be
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02166-yopenalex-snapshot
What does nihilism tell us about modal logic?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03879-5openalex-snapshot
Propositional contingentism and possible worlds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04840-4openalex-snapshot
Modality, truth and mere picture thinking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1755020317000119openalex-snapshot
STRONGLY MILLIAN SECOND-ORDER MODAL LOGICS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2024.2379894openalex-snapshot
Contingentism and fragile worlds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1993.10717328openalex-snapshot
Semantics for Natural Kind Terms1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2013.891706openalex-snapshot
Contingently existing propositions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anae048openalex-snapshot
Two distinctions about world-relative truth
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896926.003.0010openalex-snapshot
The Parallel Argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896926.003.0012openalex-snapshot
Thinking of Nothing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896926.003.0013openalex-snapshot
Five More Objections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896926.003.0014openalex-snapshot
Perfect Being Contingency?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896926.003.0016openalex-snapshot
Other Non-Concreta
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896926.003.0017openalex-snapshot
Contingency Concluded
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896926.003.0018openalex-snapshot
The Less-Maker Argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2006.00626.xopenalex-snapshot
Deriving and Validating Kripkean Claims Using the Theory of Abstract Objects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/2214181openalex-snapshot
In Defense of the Simplest Quantified Modal Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9581.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Necessity in Reference
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.