On the public citation graph

The computational value of debate in defeasible reasoning

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00721964
0 signed · 27 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/int.4550060103openalex-snapshot
A theory of defeasible reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8242-1_13openalex-snapshot
The Feasibility of Defeat in Defeasible Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0023429openalex-snapshot
Reasoning with defeasible arguments: Examples and applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90049-0openalex-snapshot
From axiom to dialogue: A philosophical study of logics and argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/3.1.3openalex-snapshot
A Tableaux Method for Systematic Simultaneous Search for Refutations and Models using Equational Problems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/3.3.317openalex-snapshot
Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/112646.112666openalex-snapshot
A tool in modelling disagreement in law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110839807openalex-snapshot
From Axiom to Dialogue
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82547openalex-snapshot
Dialogue Logic and Problem-Solving
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2106935openalex-snapshot
Knowledge and Justification.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2108001openalex-snapshot
Contemporary Theories of Knowledge.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5840/cogito19915248openalex-snapshot
Talking Philosophy: A Wordbook
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman196239323openalex-snapshot
Contemporary Theories of Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-5482openalex-snapshot
Talking philosophy: a wordbook
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7936/k7mk6b8popenalex-snapshot
A Justification Finder

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40006-0_16openalex-snapshot
On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5_11openalex-snapshot
Argumentation and Artificial Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6883-3_11-1openalex-snapshot
Argumentation and Artificial Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6883-3_11-2openalex-snapshot
Argumentation and Artificial Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3openalex-snapshot
Logics for Defeasible Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(96)00041-0openalex-snapshot
Abstract argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008304521924openalex-snapshot
Representation of formal dispute with astanding order
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008345320940openalex-snapshot
Arno R. Lodder, DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Law and Philosophy Library Vol. 42
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010322504453openalex-snapshot
Relating Protocols For Dynamic Dispute With Logics For Defeasible Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019536206548openalex-snapshot
An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/383535.383550openalex-snapshot
Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4114/ia.v19i58.1129openalex-snapshot
Restablecimiento y especificidad en Sistemas Argumentativos
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.