On the public citation graph
On the evaluation of procedural systems in laboratory experiments: A critique of Thibaut and Walker.
0 signed · 71 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90057-4openalex-snapshot
Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(76)90010-6openalex-snapshot
The socialization of jurors the voir dire as a rite of passage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1531openalex-snapshot
Determinations of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/225582openalex-snapshot
What Is and What Ought to Be: A Comparison of Certain Characteristics of the Ideological and Legal Styles of Thought
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/449826openalex-snapshot
Some Notes on Law and Change in North India
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1975.tb02172.xopenalex-snapshot
ON THE EFFICIENT ORGANIZATION OF TRIALS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02601.xopenalex-snapshot
Reactions of Participants and Observers to Modes of Adjudication1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1975.tb01302.xopenalex-snapshot
The Exercise of Information Influence in Legal Advocacy1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277602000206openalex-snapshot
Some Determinants of Preference for Modes of Conflict Resolution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1975.2.3.02a00120openalex-snapshot
scarcity and disputing: zeroing‐in on compromise decisions1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1141309openalex-snapshot
Arrest: The Decision to Take a Suspect into Custody
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1337489openalex-snapshot
The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1339895openalex-snapshot
Adversary Presentation and Bias in Legal Decisionmaking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1371953openalex-snapshot
Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2798763openalex-snapshot
The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3052933openalex-snapshot
The Practice of Law as Confidence Game Organizational Cooptation of a Profession
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053022openalex-snapshot
Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053029openalex-snapshot
A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053138openalex-snapshot
Alternatives in Dispute Processing: Litigation in a Small Claims Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053321openalex-snapshot
The Law of the Oppressed: The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3311524openalex-snapshot
The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3311527openalex-snapshot
Presentation of Evidence and Factfinding Precision
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3479330openalex-snapshot
Mao and Mediation: Politics and Dispute Resolution in Communist China
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/795616openalex-snapshot
Procedure: Transnational Perspectives and Preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/795651openalex-snapshot
The Myth of Judicial Supervision in Three "Inquisitorial" Systems: France, Italy, and Germany
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2683-0_8openalex-snapshot
Legal Justice and the Psychology of Conflict Resolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0429-4_17openalex-snapshot
Justice Motives and Other Psychological Factors in the Development and Resolution of Disputes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86017-1_12openalex-snapshot
Perseverance in Courtroom Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5332-6_3openalex-snapshot
Economic Analysis of Major Common Law Doctrines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01048012openalex-snapshot
Why procedural justice in organizations?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01126780openalex-snapshot
Context effects on procedural justice: Effects of interrelatedness, trust, and penalty on procedural preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-102801-5.50015-7openalex-snapshot
The Logic of Mediation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0730(07)02020-8openalex-snapshot
Chapter 20 Norms and the Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400x.29.1.38openalex-snapshot
The varying effect of individualism-collectivism on preference for methods of conflict resolution.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.2.320openalex-snapshot
Adversary pretrial procedures and testimonial evidence: Effects of lawyer's role and Machiavellianism.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.5.888openalex-snapshot
Adversary social roles: Their effects on witnesses' communication of evidence and the assessments of adjudicators.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.5.898openalex-snapshot
Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000370openalex-snapshot
Great expectations? Comparing litigants’ attitudes before and after using legal procedures.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1993.9712121openalex-snapshot
Dealing with Disputes: The Influence of Individualism-Collectivism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00988157.1984.9977703openalex-snapshot
Social control, structure and practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00031.xopenalex-snapshot
Obedience, Justice, and the Law PS reviews recent contributions to a field ripe for new research efforts by psychological scientists : Judgments of Justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1981.tb00825.xopenalex-snapshot
Effect of Mode of Adjudication, Presence of Defense Counsel, and Favorability of Verdict on Observers' Evaluation of a Criminal Trial1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1984.tb02251.xopenalex-snapshot
The Effects of Type of Evidence and Favorability of Verdict on Perceptions of Justice1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12603openalex-snapshot
“[Y]ou are better off talking to a f****** wall”: The perceptions and experiences of grievance procedures among incarcerated people in Ireland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113318openalex-snapshot
Procedural Justice and Policing: A Rush to Judgment?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111022-082509openalex-snapshot
Civil Litigants’ Evaluations of Their Legal Experiences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.287openalex-snapshot
On the Role of Perceived Procedural Justice in Citizens' Reactions to Government Decisions and the Handling of Conflicts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/3053606openalex-snapshot
Questions of Validity and Drawing Conclusions from Simulation Studies in Procedural Justice: A Comment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/3053607openalex-snapshot
A Philosophy of Science Perspective on the Validity of Research Conclusions: Response to Anderson and Hayden
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/3053616openalex-snapshot
In the Eye of the Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of their Experiences in the Civil Justice System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/3053718openalex-snapshot
Cultural Context and the Impact of Traffic Safety Legislation: The Reception of Mandatory Seatbelt Laws in Yugoslavia and Illinois
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.746364openalex-snapshot
The Importance of Perceived Procedural Justice Among Defendants With a Non-Western Background Involved in Dutch Criminal Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5553/rdw/138064242019040001007openalex-snapshot
Law in action in strafzaken
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5553/rem/.000014openalex-snapshot
On Experiments in Empirical Legal Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59009/ijlllc.2024.0061openalex-snapshot
INVESTIGATING HOW SEMANTICS CAN SUPPORT OR HINDER THE ADOPTION OF EDUCATIONAL INNOVATIONS
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.