On the public citation graph
The admissibility of polygraph evidence in court: Some empirical findings.
0 signed · 28 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.30.6.709openalex-snapshot
A response to Lykken on the polygraph.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.62.2.127openalex-snapshot
The effect of selected variables on interpretation of polygraph records.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.1.47openalex-snapshot
The detection of deception.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.1.54openalex-snapshot
Truth and deception: A reply to Lykken.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.4.782openalex-snapshot
Physiological measures and the detection of deception.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037441openalex-snapshot
Psychology and the lie detector industry.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01348.xopenalex-snapshot
Psychopathy and Detection of Deception In a Prison Population
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01349.xopenalex-snapshot
The Psychopath and the Lie Detector
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01350.xopenalex-snapshot
Scientific Assessment of the Accuracy of Detection of Deception: A Reply to Lykken
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01391.xopenalex-snapshot
Effectiveness of Techniques and Physiological Measures in the Detection of Deception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs10711jopenalex-snapshot
An Experimental Investigation of the Relative Validity and Utility of the Polygraph Technique and Three Other Common Methods of Criminal Identification
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1141892openalex-snapshot
The Reliability of Polygraph Examiner Diagnosis of Truth and Deception
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370040408openalex-snapshot
Trial by polygraph: Scientific and juridical issues in lie detection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370090307openalex-snapshot
The debate over drug testing in the workplace: A novel opportunity for public scientific education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.993openalex-snapshot
The Influence of fMRI Lie Detection Evidence on Juror Decision‐Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43083-6_4openalex-snapshot
Scientific Evidence and Juror Decision Making: Theory, Empirical Research, and Future Directions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044774openalex-snapshot
Polygraph admissibility: Changes and challenges.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01068163openalex-snapshot
Determining damages: The influence of expert testimony on jurors' decision making.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02700144openalex-snapshot
Evaluating polygraphy from a psychophysiological perspective: A specific-effects analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9041-0openalex-snapshot
The Court of Public Opinion: Lay Perceptions of Polygraph Testing.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01606.xopenalex-snapshot
Polygraph Testimony and Juror Judgments: A Comparison of the Guilty Knowledge Test and the Control Question Test1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01933.xopenalex-snapshot
Polygraph Evidence and Juror Judgments: The Effects of Corroborating Evidence1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2190/1ab2-3wlx-bfy1-8ycpopenalex-snapshot
The Effects of Polygraph Evidence and Eyewitness Testimony on the Beliefs and Decisions of Mock Jurors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-4115openalex-snapshot
Jury decision making: the state of the science
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.