On the public citation graph

Modalities in linear logic weaker than the exponential ?of course?: Algebraic and relational semantics

0 signed · 17 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(87)90045-4openalex-snapshot
Linear logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(88)90001-1openalex-snapshot
Fiftieth volume of theoretical computer science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/131.3/1175910openalex-snapshot
Algebraic aspect of logics without structural rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198537779.003.0010openalex-snapshot
Semantics for Substructural Logics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198537779.003.0011openalex-snapshot
The Semantics of Pretopologies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2274406openalex-snapshot
Johan van Benthem. Modal logic and classical logic. Indices, no. 3. Bibliopolis, Naples 1985 (©1983), also distributed by Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, N.J., 234 pp.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2275761openalex-snapshot
Pretopologies and completeness proofs

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60249-6_58openalex-snapshot
Categorial graphs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76920-8_8openalex-snapshot
Cover Systems for the Modalities of Linear Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00159344openalex-snapshot
Multimodal linguistic inference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53726-3.00002-5openalex-snapshot
Categorial Type Logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044481714-3/50005-9openalex-snapshot
Categorial Type Logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019915908844openalex-snapshot
Kripke Semantics for Modal Substructural Logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/b:logi.0000003928.44012.57openalex-snapshot
Normal Modal Substructural Logics with Strong Negation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/3.2-3.371openalex-snapshot
Multimodal Linguistic Inference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.47757/pal.1openalex-snapshot
Philosophy of Abstraction Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.47757/pal.2openalex-snapshot
Philosophy of Abstraction Logic
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.