On the public citation graph
Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of problem-solving bias
0 signed · 111 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(75)90055-5openalex-snapshot
The subjective side of science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(76)90016-0openalex-snapshot
The subjective side of science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076157openalex-snapshot
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717openalex-snapshot
On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/288419openalex-snapshot
Imre Lakatos and Musgrave Alan (eds.). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. 282 pp. np.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/iret-em.1960.5007537openalex-snapshot
The Ideology of Academic Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.132.7.774-aopenalex-snapshot
Cognition and Behavior Modification
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4719800openalex-extracted
Heterogeneous Priors and Information Choices: Evidence from Sell-Side Financial Analysts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<107::aid-bdm349>3.0.co;2-popenalex-snapshot
Hypothesis testing as risk behaviour with regard to beliefs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp567openalex-snapshot
Errors/Biases in Clinical Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/acp.858openalex-snapshot
Intuitions and introspections about imagery: the role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator's theoretical views
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760407openalex-snapshot
Fallacies and student discourse: Conceptualizing the role of critical thinking in science education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1580openalex-snapshot
Rethinking the “gap”: Self‐directed learning in cognitive development and scientific reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0497openalex-snapshot
The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1079openalex-snapshot
Analyses of factors related to positive test bias in software testing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57433-6_50openalex-snapshot
Positive test bias in software testing among professionals: A review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1793-7_12openalex-snapshot
The Self as Mediator of Cognitive Change in Psychotherapy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7562-3_4openalex-snapshot
A Constructivistic Foundation for Cognitive Therapy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35594-4_10openalex-snapshot
The Search for Invariance: Repeated Positive Testing Serves the Goals of Causal Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14332-8_7openalex-snapshot
Combating Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology: From the Scientific Mindset, to Busting Myths, to Prescriptive Remedies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73393-2_13openalex-snapshot
Self-Talk, Dramatic Expression, and Constructivism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11334-9_9openalex-snapshot
How Confirmation Bias Affects Novice Programmers in Testing and Debugging: Research Strategies and Implications for Tools
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01172603openalex-snapshot
An analysis of the nature and effects of test anxiety: Cognitive, behavioral, and physiological components
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01173636openalex-snapshot
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395149openalex-snapshot
The Relative Effectiveness of Diagnostic and Positive Test Strategies is Logically Indeterminable
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-005-3941-8openalex-snapshot
Decision Making for HIV Prevention Planning: Organizational Considerations and Influencing Factors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-015-9292-xopenalex-snapshot
Maturationally Natural Cognition, Radically Counter-Intuitive Science, and the Theory-Ladenness of Perception
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9146-6openalex-snapshot
Understanding Scientific Methodology in the Historical and Experimental Sciences via Language Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-014-9250-6openalex-snapshot
Empirical analysis of factors affecting confirmation bias levels of software engineers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9217-4openalex-snapshot
Scientists’ Argumentative Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-997-1008-xopenalex-snapshot
Effects of test cost and cognitive demand on hypothesis-testing behaviors: Three experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0021-4openalex-snapshot
The Social Origins of Folk Epistemology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-024-00732-1openalex-snapshot
Intellectual Humility and Humbling Environments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-026-00296-6openalex-snapshot
Are Scientists Naïve Humans?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(91)90023-sopenalex-snapshot
Data selection in a minimal hypothesis testing task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(90)90038-nopenalex-snapshot
Some situational determinants of hypothesis-testing strategies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/03149-1openalex-snapshot
Truth and Credibility: Science and the Social Study of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.85039-4openalex-snapshot
Truth and Credibility in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-747050-4.50014-5openalex-snapshot
Applying a Cognitive Behavioral View to Clinical and Social Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2003.10.001openalex-snapshot
Collaborative discovery in a simple reasoning task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2019.12.010openalex-snapshot
Bias in the evaluation of psychology studies: A comparison of parapsychology versus neuroscience
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.006openalex-snapshot
Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: Science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.02.002openalex-snapshot
The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific practice. The case of Homo floresiensis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001openalex-snapshot
Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60315-1openalex-snapshot
Varieties of Confirmation Bias
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610926openalex-snapshot
A Philosophical Approach to MOND: Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610926.002openalex-snapshot
The Epistemology of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610926.003openalex-snapshot
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610926.004openalex-snapshot
The Milgromian Research Program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610926.005openalex-snapshot
Theory Variant T0: The Foundational Postulates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610926.006openalex-snapshot
Theory Variant T1: A Non-relativistic Lagrangian
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610926.007openalex-snapshot
Theory Variant T2: A Relativistic Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610926.008openalex-snapshot
Theory Variant T3: A Modified Hard Core
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.1.3openalex-snapshot
The Psychology of Science: Review and Integration of a Nascent Discipline
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0021110openalex-snapshot
Hypothesis generation, sparse categories, and the positive test strategy.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0080795openalex-snapshot
Sadder but wiser: A failure to demonstrate that mood influences judgements of control.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2025.2506449openalex-snapshot
How Do “Ugly Science” and “Dirty Science” Affect the Practice of Clinical Science?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00221309709595505openalex-snapshot
Effects of Hypothesis Generation on Hypothesis Testing in Rule-Discovery Tasks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248237openalex-snapshot
Strategies of Rule Discovery in an Inference Task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02691728908578522openalex-snapshot
Toward a cognitive psychology of science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000567openalex-snapshot
Creativity and Inductive Reasoning: The Relationship between Divergent Thinking and Performance on Wason's 2—4—6 Task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.1997.10558147openalex-snapshot
When falsification fails
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.633580openalex-snapshot
Initial Impressions and the Student Evaluation of Teaching
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1268922openalex-snapshot
Who Believes in the Storybook Image of the Scientist?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.713145openalex-snapshot
Exposing the Challenges and Coping Strategies of Field-Ecology Graduate Students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09541440440000249openalex-snapshot
The impact of external representation in a rule discovery task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/135467899394084openalex-snapshot
Hypothesis Testing: Strategy Selection for Generalising versus Limiting Hypotheses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14640748408402183openalex-snapshot
A Comparison of Disconfirmatory, Confirmatory and Control Strategies on Wason's 2–4–6 Task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14640748608401583openalex-snapshot
A Philosophical and Empirical Analysis of Subjects’ Modes of Inquiry in Wason's 2–4–6 Task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14640748808402286openalex-snapshot
The Role of Explicit and Implicit Learning Processes in Concept Discovery
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401035openalex-snapshot
Evaluating Negative Tests and Refutations in a Rule Discovery Task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401036openalex-snapshot
Improving Performance and Increasing the Use of Non-Positive Testing in a Rule-Discovery Task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/415619openalex-snapshot
Hypothesis Testing in Ecology: Psychological Aspects and the Importance of Theory Maturation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1981.4308761openalex-snapshot
Behavioral and Organizational Considerations in the Design of Information Systems and Processes for Planning and Decision Support
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00443openalex-snapshot
Elementary School-Age Children's Capacity to Choose Positive Diagnostic and Negative Diagnostic Tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1174/021093903765762929openalex-snapshot
Teorías implícitas sobre creatividad artística: estudio de las síntesis de conocimiento
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869403openalex-snapshot
Mediated Misinformation: Questions Answered, More Questions to Ask
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/000306519204000106openalex-snapshot
Interpretive Methodology: Some Problems, Limitations, and Remedial Strategies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808321526openalex-snapshot
Science and Pseudoscience in Law Enforcement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/019251384005004004openalex-snapshot
The Method of Multiple Hypotheses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/030631291021003008openalex-snapshot
Rule Discovery Strategies: Falsification without Disconfirmation (Reply to Gorman)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/105960118200700408openalex-snapshot
Strategies for Implementing Change: An Experiential Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/107554708200300405openalex-snapshot
A Needed Component in Prescriptions for Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1201/9781420047523-15openalex-snapshot
Bounded Rationality and Criminal Investigations: Has Tunnel Vision Been Wrongfully Convicted?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1201/9781420047523.ch6openalex-snapshot
Bounded Rationality and Criminal Investigations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_05openalex-snapshot
When Homer Nods: An Examination of Some Systematic Errors in Rorschach Scholarship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1openalex-snapshot
Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.25.5.423openalex-snapshot
Advocacy and Objectivity in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1348/014466505x29981openalex-snapshot
Developing a theoretical understanding of therapy techniques: An illustrative analogue study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126938openalex-snapshot
Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.2.108openalex-snapshot
Stuck in the Past: Why Managers Persist with New Product Failures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21236/ada348830openalex-snapshot
The Role of Data and Feedback Error in Inference and Prediction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3115/1149293.1149350openalex-snapshot
An experimental study on collaborative scientific activities with an actual/imaginary partner
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rj9ktopenalex-snapshot
Hypothesis generation, the positive test strategy, and sparse categories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715696openalex-snapshot
Opposites in Reasoning Processes: Do We Use Them More Than We Think, but Less Than We Could?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197071openalex-snapshot
Sensible reasoning in two tasks: Rule discovery and hypothesis evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197238openalex-snapshot
The diversity principle in the testing of arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3758/bf03333674openalex-snapshot
Overconfidence in ignorant experts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.406openalex-snapshot
La psicología social de la ciencia: una revisión bibliográfica de su estado actual
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5937/psistra0-59009openalex-snapshot
Clinical decision making and mental health: On challenges in assessment, junk science and social trends
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7208/9780226467245-009openalex-snapshot
8. How to be Antiscientific
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4879.003.0017openalex-snapshot
How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.