On the public citation graph

A ?ukasiewicz-style refutation system for the modal logic S4

0 signed · 16 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6259-0_1openalex-snapshot

Basic Modal Logic

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01054714openalex-snapshot

Refutation systems in modal logic

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093634486openalex-snapshot

Refutation calculi for certain intermediate propositional logics.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680openalex-snapshot

Bulletin of the Section of Logic

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65430-0_40openalex-snapshot

Rejection in Łukasiewicz’s and Słupecki’s Sense

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0479-4_2openalex-snapshot

Refutation Systems in Propositional Logic

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2798-3_4openalex-snapshot

Refutations and Proofs in S4

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2221-5_9openalex-snapshot

Refutation Systems: An Overview and Some Applications to Philosophical Logics

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-022-09386-7openalex-snapshot

Falsification-Aware Calculi and Semantics for Normal Modal Logics Including S4 and S5

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-024-09416-6openalex-snapshot

Rules of Explosion and Excluded Middle: Constructing a Unified Single-Succedent Gentzen-Style Framework for Classical, Paradefinite, Paraconsistent, and Paracomplete Logics

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-023-10052-7openalex-snapshot

Refutation-Aware Gentzen-Style Calculi for Propositional Until-Free Linear-Time Temporal Logic

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-011-0030-9openalex-snapshot

On Pairs of Dual Consequence Operations

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2024.2316447openalex-snapshot

The Pioneering Proving Methods as Applied in the Warsaw School of Logic – Their Historical and Contemporary Significance

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exs053openalex-snapshot

Terminating sequent calculi for proving and refuting formulas in S4

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1039096306openalex-snapshot

Which Modal Logic Is the Right One?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1040408615openalex-snapshot

Syntactic Refutations against Finite Models in Modal Logic

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.