On the public citation graph
In the realm of agents
0 signed · 53 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0462-5openalex-snapshot
Handbook of Philosophical Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00247747openalex-snapshot
A technical note on Lars Lindahl's Position and Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00385718openalex-snapshot
Before refraining: Concepts for agency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00869486openalex-snapshot
Collective action, supervenience, and constitution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01028972openalex-snapshot
Time and modality in the logic of agency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01531259openalex-snapshot
Conditional obligation, deontic paradoxes, and the logic of agency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1988.tb00717.xopenalex-snapshot
Seeing to it that: a canonical form for agentives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2108182openalex-snapshot
Backwards and Forwards in the Modal Logic of Agency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2219498openalex-snapshot
Position and Change: A Study in Law and Logic.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61630-6_8openalex-snapshot
A modal action logic based framework for organization specification and analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1488-8_1openalex-snapshot
From the Fundamental Legal Conceptions of Hohfeld to Legal Relations: Refining the Enrichment of Solely Deontic Legal Relations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1488-8_11openalex-snapshot
Indirect Action, Influence and Responsibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53487-5_8openalex-snapshot
Causal Agency and Responsibility: A Refinement of STIT Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01754-9_11openalex-snapshot
Some Examples Formulated in a ‘Seeing to It That’ Logic: Illustrations, Observations, Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30227-8_9openalex-snapshot
Qualitative Action Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01052780openalex-snapshot
Doing and refraining from refraining
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01053002openalex-snapshot
Busy choice sequences refraining formulas and modalities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01054713openalex-snapshot
Decidability ofstit theory with a single agent andRefref Equivalence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01321177openalex-snapshot
Competing agents in agent-mediated institutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0013997openalex-snapshot
Decidability of deliberative stit theories with multiple agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00730-2openalex-snapshot
A Logical Study of Moral Responsibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9365-7openalex-snapshot
Combinations of Stit with Ought and Know
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-020-09554-9openalex-snapshot
Some Forms of Collectively Bringing About or ‘Seeing to it that’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2024.105257openalex-snapshot
Reasoning about group responsibility for exceeding risk threshold in one-shot games
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021841323244openalex-snapshot
Obligation and the Conditional in Stit Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021871106406openalex-snapshot
Old Foundations for the Logic of Agency and Action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/0195134613.005.0001openalex-snapshot
Proofs of Validities and Propositions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzp072openalex-snapshot
Collective agency, direct action and dynamic operators
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exs059openalex-snapshot
Non-monotonic reasoning with normative conflicts in multi-agent deontic logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1971.tb00536.xopenalex-snapshot
LOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1039118864openalex-snapshot
Uncompactness of Stit Logics Containing Generalized Refref Conditionals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/2275842openalex-snapshot
On the basic logic ofSTITwith a single agent
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.