On the public citation graph

Towards a formal theory of defeasible deontic conditionals

0 signed · 20 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00413581openalex-snapshot
?Ought? and ?Must?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00869304openalex-snapshot
Ideality, sub-ideality and deontic logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00869396openalex-snapshot
Dyadic deontic detachment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0018430openalex-snapshot
Commonsense entailment: A modal theory of nonmonotonic reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(88)90079-3openalex-snapshot
An approach to default reasoning based on a first-order conditional logic: Revised report
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511621192openalex-snapshot
Modal Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/24.2.33openalex-snapshot
Contrary-To-Duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00105.xopenalex-snapshot
On the Logic of Deontic Conditionals*

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0167-1_23openalex-snapshot
Research Notes on Developing a Formal Organizational Language
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5643-5_4openalex-snapshot
The Role of Deontic Logic in the Specification of Information Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0349-4_1openalex-snapshot
An Overview of Fibred Semantics and the Combination of Logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0387-2_4openalex-snapshot
Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8851-5_13openalex-snapshot
A New Approach to Contrary-to-Duty Obligations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370670openalex-snapshot
Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370673openalex-snapshot
Deontic database constraints, violation and recovery
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01587101openalex-snapshot
Utilizing deontic operators in information systems specification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9866-4openalex-snapshot
Two dimensional Standard Deontic Logic [including a detailed analysis of the 1985 Jones–Pörn deontic logic system]
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/dexa.2001.953150openalex-snapshot
Towards electronic contract performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/158976.158983openalex-snapshot
Violation of norms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/2275807openalex-snapshot
Fibred semantics and the weaving of logics. Part 1: Modal and intuitionistic logics
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.