On the public citation graph

Semantical analysis of Arruda da CostaP systems and adjacent non-replacement relevant systems

0 signed · 16 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370443openalex-snapshot

Alternative semantics for quantified first degree relevant logic

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00832085openalex-snapshot

Dialectical logic, classical logic, and the consistency of the world

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2214309openalex-snapshot

The Semantics of First Degree Entailment

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315663135-14openalex-snapshot

Communication and Cognition

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4467/20842589rmopenalex-snapshot

Reports on Mathematical Logic

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197760316openalex-snapshot

Extensional Reduction—I

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0460-1_4openalex-snapshot

Paraconsistent Logic

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00174897openalex-snapshot

Dialectical logic, semantics and metamathematics

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00935738openalex-snapshot

On the relevant systemsP andP * and some related systems

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-014-9241-zopenalex-snapshot

A Note on Contraction-Free Logic for Validity

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044451541-4/50013-0openalex-snapshot

Truth and Paradox

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044451541-4/50023-3openalex-snapshot

Paraconsistent Logics and Paraconsistency

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0049-237x(09)70492-6openalex-snapshot

Problems and Solutions in the Semantics of Quantified Relevant Logics. I.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v11i2.2142openalex-snapshot

Modal Noneism: Transworld Identity, Identification, and Individuation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4288/kisoron1954.30.61openalex-snapshot

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.46992/pijp.24.1.a.2openalex-snapshot

What do Paraconsistent Logics Reject? A Defense of the Law of Contradiction

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.