On the public citation graph
Non-welfaristic theories of justice: Is ?the intersection approach? a solution to the indexing impasse?
0 signed · 58 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9532-1_7openalex-snapshot
Disparate Goods and Rawls’ Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00148957openalex-snapshot
The primary-goods indexation problem in Rawls's theory of justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0258-2openalex-snapshot
The impossibility of a Paretian egalitarian
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050163openalex-snapshot
The distribution problem and Rawlsian reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511571756openalex-snapshot
Rational Behaviour and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2001.9666170openalex-snapshot
A Balanced View of Development as Freedom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/378533openalex-snapshot
Any Non‐welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle: A Comment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203325100openalex-snapshot
Inequality and Economic Integration
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2505089openalex-extracted
Value Pluralism, Trade-Offs and Efficiencies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2520744openalex-extracted
Does the Choice of Well-Being Measure Matter Empirically? An Illustration with German Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4057102openalex-extracted
Global Income Poverty Measurement with Preference Heterogeneity: Theory and Application
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119257424.ch1openalex-snapshot
Well‐Being as a Multidimensional Phenomenon
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-58802-2_875openalex-snapshot
Justice (New Perspectives)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62046-1_3openalex-snapshot
Valuation of Functioning Bundles and Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1896-1_4openalex-snapshot
Operations Over the Set of Binary Relations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0519-1_12openalex-snapshot
Does the Choice of Well-Being Measures Matter in Respecting Human Dignity? Empirical Results from an Indian Slum Survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0248-xopenalex-snapshot
Social choice and the indexing dilemma
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0707-xopenalex-snapshot
Welfare, labor supply and heterogeneous preferences: evidence for Europe and the US
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-016-1021-9openalex-snapshot
Conundrums for nonconsequentialists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-59428-0.00003-5openalex-snapshot
Inequality, Income, and Well-Being
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.004openalex-snapshot
When Individual Preferences Defy Sustainability — Can Merit Good Arguments Close the Gap?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103666openalex-snapshot
Non-parametric well-being comparisons
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103396openalex-snapshot
On the properties of the two main types of global poverty lines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103544openalex-snapshot
Global income poverty measurement with preference heterogeneity: Theory and application
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.004openalex-snapshot
Capabilities as menus: A non-welfarist basis for QALY evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s026626710800182xopenalex-snapshot
THE VEIL OF IGNORANCE VIOLATES PRIORITY
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267112000132openalex-snapshot
ON DOMINANCE AND CONTEXT-DEPENDENCE IN DECISIONS INVOLVING MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2301-1openalex-snapshot
Justice (New Perspectives)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2301openalex-snapshot
Justice (New Perspectives)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14649880701462239openalex-snapshot
Capabilities and Satisfaction with Life
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2020.1773776openalex-snapshot
Extending the Intersection Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/378533openalex-snapshot
Any Non‐welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle: A Comment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290420.003.0019openalex-snapshot
CHAPTER 18 Rawlsian Justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290420.003.0024openalex-snapshot
The capabilities approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199215911.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifr018openalex-snapshot
Preferences and Subjective Satisfaction: Measuring Well-being on the Job for Policy Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifx024openalex-snapshot
Computation of Equivalent Incomes and Social Welfare for EU and Non-EU Countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpl030openalex-snapshot
Minimal relativism, dominance, and standard of living comparisons based on functionings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12152openalex-snapshot
Happiness, Equivalent Incomes and Respect for Individual Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2013.12008.xopenalex-snapshot
What If We Voted on the Weights of a Multidimensional Well‐Being Index? An Illustration with Flemish Data*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12045openalex-snapshot
Liberal Resourcism: Problems and Possibilities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12817openalex-snapshot
A philosopher's guide to multidimensional equality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12407openalex-snapshot
Eliciting, Applying And Exploring Multidimensional Welfare Weights: Evidence From The Field
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030429openalex-snapshot
Economic Theories of Justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.1029openalex-snapshot
Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1257/mic.5.3.180openalex-snapshot
Behavioral Welfare Economics and Redistribution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-10519openalex-snapshot
A Meta-Theory for Absolute Poverty Lines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9844openalex-snapshot
Fair and Welfare-Consistent Global Income Poverty Measurement: Theory and Application
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-2-67-93openalex-snapshot
Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare. Part I
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-3-32-51openalex-snapshot
Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare. Part II
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/redp.171.0037openalex-snapshot
Social orderings and the evaluation of public policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/redp.211.0035openalex-snapshot
Willingness-to-pay and the equivalence approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203325100openalex-snapshot
Inequality and Economic Integration
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.