On the public citation graph

The minimal overlap rule revisited

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0269-5
0 signed · 31 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00179098openalex-snapshot
New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02109593openalex-snapshot
Bankruptcy games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02579019openalex-snapshot
Sustainability in bankruptcy problems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-004-0527-zopenalex-snapshot
Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra?s proposal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(60)90366-5openalex-snapshot
Contributions to the theory of games.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(85)90102-4openalex-snapshot
Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(82)90029-4openalex-snapshot
A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.01.006openalex-snapshot
Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4896(01)00075-0openalex-snapshot
The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4896(02)00070-7openalex-snapshot
Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511528446.003openalex-snapshot
A value for n -person games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2297983openalex-snapshot
Serial Cost-Sharing of Excludable Public Goods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2951537openalex-snapshot
Serial Cost Sharing

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1347172openalex-extracted
A New Prospect of Additivity in Bankruptcy Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1745528openalex-extracted
Merging and Going Bankrupt: A Neutral Solution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2533993openalex-extracted
Bankruptcy Problems: On Rights Arbitration and Game Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0575-5openalex-snapshot
Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-016-0960-9openalex-snapshot
Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0302-3openalex-snapshot
Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-009-0378-4openalex-snapshot
Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-018-9863-0openalex-snapshot
On the Convergence of the Generalized Ibn Ezra Value
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-012-0262-8openalex-snapshot
The minimal overlap rule: restrictions on mergers for creditors’ consensus
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.12.008openalex-snapshot
Non-cooperative solutions for estate division problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.09.002openalex-snapshot
Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: An update
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1090/conm/624/12470openalex-snapshot
The dynamics of consistent bankruptcy rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.12366openalex-snapshot
Refining the Lorenz‐ranking of rules for claims problems on restricted domains
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1142/s0219198913400185openalex-snapshot
GAME-THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF BANKRUPTCY AND TAXATION PROBLEMS: RECENT ADVANCES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20081209cbopenalex-snapshot
Risk aversion and equilibria, intertemporal transfers, strategic claims.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26481/umamet.2008038openalex-snapshot
Non-Cooperative Solutions for Claims Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/redp.335.0765openalex-snapshot
An Algorithmic Rule to Solve the Extended Ibn Ezra – Rabad Problem: Recursive Constrained Unanimity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-9-2016openalex-snapshot
Developing new scenarios for water allocation negotiations: a case study of the Euphrates River Basin
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.