On the public citation graph
On the probability of observing Borda’s paradox
0 signed · 37 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830230103openalex-snapshot
Borda's voting paradox: Theoretical likelihood and electoral occurrences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79128-7openalex-snapshot
The mathematics of preference, choice and order : essays in honor of Peter C. Fishburn
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79128-7_10openalex-snapshot
Condorcet's Paradox with Three Candidates
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00179239openalex-snapshot
The plurality majority converse under single peakedness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01213253openalex-snapshot
The Borda method is most likely to respect the Condorcet principle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01718459openalex-snapshot
Borda's rule, positional voting, and Condorcet's simple majority principle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0084-4openalex-snapshot
The sensitivity of weight selection for scoring rules to profile proximity to single-peaked preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0236-1openalex-snapshot
On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050011openalex-snapshot
Analytical representation of probabilities under the IAC condition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-005-0132-zopenalex-snapshot
Probabilities of election outcomes with two parameters: The relative impact of unifying and polarizing candidates
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-008-9097-zopenalex-snapshot
The Unexpected Behavior of Plurality Rule
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(93)90046-lopenalex-snapshot
On the probability of electing the Condorcet
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2007.05.003openalex-snapshot
Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4068(98)00062-7openalex-snapshot
The geometry of Black's single peakedness and related conditions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055400262357openalex-snapshot
Majority Decision-Making with Partial Unidimensionality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1884349openalex-snapshot
Utility, Strategy, and Social Decision Rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1914033openalex-snapshot
Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2550498openalex-snapshot
The Theory of Committees and Elections.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48598-6_17openalex-snapshot
IAC Probability Calculations in Voting Theory: Progress Report
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95933-7_77openalex-snapshot
Two Possible Paradoxes in Numerical Comparisons of Optimization Algorithms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03107-6_3openalex-snapshot
Other Incompatibility Paradoxes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0522-1openalex-snapshot
Borda’s Paradox with weighted scoring rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03152-yopenalex-snapshot
Computations of volumes and Ehrhart series in four candidates elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9605-7openalex-snapshot
On the Likelihood of the Borda Effect: The Overall Probabilities for General Weighted Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00692-6openalex-snapshot
Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to the committee selection setting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9649-1openalex-snapshot
Another Perspective on Borda's Paradox
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-019-09716-5openalex-snapshot
Condorcet efficiency of the preference approval voting and the probability of selecting the Condorcet loser
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39656-8openalex-snapshot
Computations of volumes in five candidates elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/41615476openalex-snapshot
The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules with Mutually Coherent Voter Preferences: A Borda Compromise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/redp.273.0375openalex-snapshot
Scoring Rules and Preference Restrictions: The Strong Borda Paradox Revisited
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1704.00153openalex-snapshot
Computations of volumes and Ehrhart series in four candidates elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/0ad2887czcc97z46bazb332z73eaf3c24ccaopenalex-snapshot
Analyse probabiliste des règles de vote : méthodes et résultats
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.