On the public citation graph
Reaching consensus: solidarity and strategic properties in binary social choice
0 signed · 35 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1997.2294openalex-snapshot
The Replacement Principle in Economies with Single-Peaked Preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00452885openalex-snapshot
Generalized condorcet-winners for single peaked and single-plateau preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-011-0305-7openalex-snapshot
Group strategy-proof social choice functions with binary ranges and arbitrary domains: characterization results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0358-0openalex-snapshot
On the equivalence of coalitional and individual strategy-proofness properties
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0526-xopenalex-snapshot
The replacement principle for the provision of multiple public goods on tree networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050091openalex-snapshot
The replacement principle in economies with indivisible goods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050150openalex-snapshot
Welfare-domination under preference-replacement: A survey and open questions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-013-0146-xopenalex-snapshot
On the structure of voting systems between two alternatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2openalex-snapshot
Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(83)90074-1openalex-snapshot
Problems of fair division and the Egalitarian solution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(93)90169-dopenalex-snapshot
The replacement principle in public good economies with single-peaked preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.06.011openalex-snapshot
Unfolding the mystery of false-name-proofness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.12.007openalex-snapshot
Secure implementation experiments: Do strategy-proof mechanisms really work?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2007.03.006openalex-snapshot
Public decisions: Solidarity and the status quo
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2010.03.006openalex-snapshot
Individual versus group strategy-proofness: When do they coincide?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2006.03.008openalex-snapshot
Strategy-proof voting on the full preference domain
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.02.003openalex-snapshot
Group strategy-proofness and voting between two alternatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.8.3.319openalex-snapshot
The Fair Division of a Fixed Supply Among a Growing Population
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1884280openalex-snapshot
The Pure Compensation Problem: Egalitarianism Versus Laissez-Fairism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1907651openalex-snapshot
A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1914083openalex-snapshot
Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048128openalex-extracted
On Strategy-Proof Social Choice between Two Alternatives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3285105openalex-extracted
Solidarity and Efficiency in Preference Aggregation: A Tale of Two Rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-019-01220-7openalex-snapshot
On strategy-proof social choice between two alternatives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-019-01225-2openalex-snapshot
Upper Set Rules with Binary Ranges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01245-3openalex-snapshot
Solidarity for public goods under single-peaked preferences: characterizing target set correspondences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-025-01644-4openalex-snapshot
Binary public decisions with a status quo: Undominated mechanisms without harm
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109154openalex-snapshot
A characterization of status quo rules in the binary social choice model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111548openalex-snapshot
A characterization of unanimity with status quo: Fixed vs variable population
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2015.12.009openalex-snapshot
Solidarity in preference aggregation: Improving on a status quo
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2019.08.013openalex-snapshot
Solidarity and efficiency in preference aggregation: A tale of two rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2026.103215openalex-snapshot
On strategy-proofness and single peakedness: A full characterization
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.