On the public citation graph
Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation
0 signed · 297 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.002openalex-snapshot
Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.013openalex-snapshot
Misdefining “climate change”: consequences for science and action
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-3780(97)00003-4openalex-snapshot
Human adaptation to climatic variability and change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-3780(97)82914-7openalex-snapshot
Climate change 1995: Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientifictechnical analyses. Contribution of working group ii to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511596667.006openalex-snapshot
Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511818110.009openalex-snapshot
Making sense of science in policy and politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511841200openalex-snapshot
Why We Disagree about Climate Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300001442openalex-snapshot
Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005312331477openalex-snapshot
Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005315532386openalex-snapshot
Context and Early Origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005696309150openalex-snapshot
Revised Rules of Procedure for the IPCC Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009652531101openalex-snapshot
The Science of Adaptation: A Framework for Assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/463730aopenalex-snapshot
IPCC: cherish it, tweak it or scrap it?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1601openalex-snapshot
Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science–policy interface
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00245openalex-snapshot
The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189420openalex-snapshot
Testing Time for Climate Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2265930openalex-snapshot
Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3341469openalex-snapshot
Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7356334openalex-snapshot
Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-0347openalex-snapshot
Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses: contribution of Working Group II to the second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-5511openalex-snapshot
Earthly politics: local and global in environmental governance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-5034openalex-snapshot
Science as a contact sport: inside the battle to save Earth's climate
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2661750openalex-extracted
Logics of Science, Politics, and Law in International Environmental Protection: The Role of Boundary Organisations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2830581openalex-extracted
Governance of Slow-Developing Catastrophic Risks: Fostering Complex Adaptive System and Resilience Thinking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4665943openalex-extracted
“More than Policy Neutral”: Justifying the Power of Science-Policy Interfaces Through Legitimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0254openalex-snapshot
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC )
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0254.pub2openalex-snapshot
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC )
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118845028.ch45openalex-snapshot
Disaster risk management and climate change adaptation revisited
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1654openalex-snapshot
Rebalancing Climate Change Debate and Policy: An Analysis of Online Discussions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.151openalex-snapshot
The challenges of building cosmopolitan climate expertise: the case of Germany
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.166openalex-snapshot
The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.168openalex-snapshot
The legacy of climategate: undermining or revitalizing climate science and policy?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.297openalex-snapshot
The IPCC and treatment of uncertainties: topics and sources of dissensus
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.427openalex-snapshot
The Paris Agreement and the inherent inconsistency of climate policymaking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.547openalex-snapshot
The IPCC and the new map of science and politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.570openalex-snapshot
Relationship‐building between climate scientists and publics as an alternative to information transfer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.636openalex-snapshot
A history of the global carbon budget
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.917openalex-snapshot
Who are the green transition experts? Towards a new research agenda on climate change knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75329-0_4openalex-snapshot
Participant Selection Modes for Policy-Developing Collectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89312-5_23openalex-snapshot
(Research): Sea Ice Hazard Data Needs for Search and Rescue in Utqiaġvik, Alaska
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60974-9_10openalex-snapshot
Transdisciplinary Approaches in Assimilating Power and Diversity to Address Children’s Interface with the Law: A Case Study from India
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68260-5_3openalex-snapshot
Science–Policy Interfaces (Beyond Myth and Wishful Thinking)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68260-5_4openalex-snapshot
The Practice of Bridging Science and Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-13886-6_14openalex-snapshot
Chapter 14: Science-Policy Interfaces and Sustainable Development: Institutionally Bridging the Knowledge–Action Gap
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34079-1_2openalex-snapshot
The RIU Model as an Analytical Framework for Scientific Knowledge Transfer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34079-1_4openalex-snapshot
Theoretical Foundations of RIU
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39116-8_15openalex-snapshot
Arctic Futures: Agency and Assessing Assessments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43281-6_5openalex-snapshot
Fact/Value Conflation and the Danger of the Traditional Models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43281-6_7openalex-snapshot
Understanding and Evaluating the IAM-Based Economics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56577-4_5openalex-snapshot
Fascinating! Popular Science Communication and Literary Science Fiction: The Shared Features of Awe and Fascination and Their Significance to Ideas of Science Fictions as Vehicles for Critical Debate About Scientific Enterprises and Their Ethical Implications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74669-2_4openalex-snapshot
Rethinking IPCC Expertise from a Multi-actor Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05578-3_2openalex-snapshot
Anpassung an den Klimawandel. Herausforderungen an Politikberatung
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35393-3_11openalex-snapshot
Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung in der Corona-Krise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41882-3_15openalex-snapshot
Die Naturwissenschaften und die Klimapolitik
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-49328-8_8openalex-snapshot
Transnational Climate Change Governance and the Postcolonial Appendices: The Case of the IPCC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66497-1_5openalex-snapshot
Kapitel 1. Einleitung: Strukturen für ein klimafreundliches Leben
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-016-0137-4openalex-snapshot
Zum Aufbau der Atmosphärenwissenschaften in der BRD seit 1968
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0868-6openalex-snapshot
Endangered Mangroves in Segara Anakan, Indonesia: Effective and Failed Problem-Solving Policy Advice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0269-yopenalex-snapshot
Climate change adaptation and sustainable regional development: a case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0385-3openalex-snapshot
Moving beyond the conceptual: specificity in regional climate change adaptation actions for biodiversity in South East Queensland, Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0489-4openalex-snapshot
Policy networks, stakeholder interactions and climate adaptation in the region of South East Queensland, Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0781-8openalex-snapshot
Managing climate change in conservation practice: an exploration of the science–management interface in beech forest management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0820-5openalex-snapshot
The RIU model as an analytical framework for scientific knowledge transfer: the case of the “decision support system forest and climate change”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1132-8openalex-snapshot
Governance options for science–policy interfaces on biodiversity and ecosystem services: comparing a network versus a platform approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0214-6openalex-snapshot
Regulating knowledge monopolies: the case of the IPCC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0350-zopenalex-snapshot
Authorship in IPCC AR5 and its implications for content: climate change and Indigenous populations in WGII
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1237-6openalex-snapshot
Behind the curve: science and the politics of global warming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2106-xopenalex-snapshot
A six-component model for assessing procedural fairness in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2180-8openalex-snapshot
Pathways to deliberative capacity: the role of the IPCC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02762-xopenalex-snapshot
Assessing the feasibility of adaptation options: methodological advancements and directions for climate adaptation research and practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03108-xopenalex-snapshot
Usable climate science is adaptation science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03210-0openalex-snapshot
Post-Paris policy relevance: lessons from the IPCC SR15 process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03347-6openalex-snapshot
A defense of usable climate mitigation science: how science can contribute to social movements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03866-yopenalex-snapshot
Unlearning modernity? A critical examination of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-025-09708-7openalex-snapshot
Multistakeholder governance through epistemic authority: exploring the role of the Climate and Clean Air Coalition in the global climate regime
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09528-0openalex-snapshot
Making Science Relevant: Comparing Two Science Advisory Organizations Beyond the Linear Knowledge Model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-025-09608-9openalex-snapshot
What Makes Knowledge Relevant? A Practice-Theoretical Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9187-9openalex-snapshot
Scientific opinion in policymaking: the case of climate change adaptation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9196-3openalex-snapshot
Pathways to impact in local government: the mini-Stern review as evidence in policy making in the Leeds City Region
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02472-5openalex-snapshot
The myth of informed decision-making: explaining the substantive effectiveness of LCA use in a building product development project
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0529-6openalex-snapshot
Interactions between scientific and social rationality: recommendation of intermediate layer for transdisciplinary sustainable science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00759-9openalex-snapshot
A review of data-intensive approaches for sustainability: methodology, epistemology, normativity, and ontology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01238-4openalex-snapshot
Working the boundary: science–policy interactions and uneven knowledge politics in IPBES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-022-00454-0openalex-snapshot
From epistemology to policy: reorienting philosophy courses for science students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-022-00464-yopenalex-snapshot
Cultural Theory’s contributions to climate science: reply to Hansson
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0999-2openalex-snapshot
Toward successful implementation of conservation research: A case study from Vietnam
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00123-0openalex-snapshot
Scenarios and Decision Support for Security and Conflict Risks in the Context of Climate Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44168-022-00025-2openalex-snapshot
Science for implementation: the roles, experiences, and perceptions of practitioners involved in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108980openalex-snapshot
Knowledge production for target-based biodiversity governance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2017.04.003openalex-snapshot
Enhancing the contribution and role of practitioner knowledge in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group (WG) II process: Insights from UK workshops
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.004openalex-snapshot
In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004openalex-snapshot
What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.11.001openalex-snapshot
Boundary organizations and environmental governance: Performance, institutional design, and conceptual development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100257openalex-snapshot
Risking the earth Part 1: Reassessing dangerous anthropogenic interference and climate risk in IPCC processes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100260openalex-snapshot
Risking the earth Part 2: Power politics and structural reform of the IPCC and UNFCCC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111762openalex-snapshot
Travelling away from home? Joining global change and recovery scenarios to anticipate the marine distribution of diadromous fish
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100756openalex-snapshot
Not all litter is littered: An exploration of unintentional means of public waste generation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100568openalex-snapshot
Dialogic science-policy networks for water security governance in the arid Americas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.008openalex-snapshot
Bridging science and traditional knowledge to assess cumulative impacts of stressors on ecosystem health
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.002openalex-snapshot
Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.015openalex-snapshot
Constructing sustainability in EU fisheries: Re-drawing the boundary between science and politics?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008openalex-snapshot
Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science–policy interface
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.009openalex-snapshot
Mainstreaming climate change adaptation: An incremental approach to disaster risk management in Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.009openalex-snapshot
Science, policy and place in volcanic disasters: Insights from Montserrat
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002openalex-snapshot
Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.029openalex-snapshot
The challenge of knowledge exchange in national policy impact assessment – A case of Finnish climate policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.007openalex-snapshot
Knowledge brokerage designs and practices in four european climate services: A role model for biodiversity policies?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.012openalex-snapshot
(Anti)-boundary work in global environmental change research and assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.001openalex-snapshot
Why the IPCC should evolve in response to the UNFCCC bottom-up strategy adopted in Paris? An opinion from the French Association for Disaster Risk Reduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.017openalex-snapshot
Science advice for global challenges: Learning from trade-offs in the IPCC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.007openalex-snapshot
Climate-related displacements of coastal communities in the Arctic: Engaging traditional knowledge in adaptation strategies and policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.09.003openalex-snapshot
Climate change and globalisation as ‘Double Exposure’: Implications for policy development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.09.010openalex-snapshot
Co-producing UK climate change adaptation policy: An analysis of the 2012 and 2017 UK Climate Change Risk Assessments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.002openalex-snapshot
Shaping flood risk governance through science-policy interfaces: Insights from England, France and the Netherlands
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.020openalex-snapshot
Taking science by surprise: The knowledge politics of the IPCC Special Report on 1.5 degrees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.007openalex-snapshot
Decision-making, now in 3D: Exploring three dimensions of decision-making processes and their consequences for biodiversity research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.008openalex-snapshot
Holding the ground. Alliances and defiances between scientists, policy-makers and civil society in the development of a voluntary initiative, the “4 per 1000: Soils for food security and climate”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.017openalex-snapshot
Balancing authority and meaning in global environmental assessment: An analysis of organisational logics and modes in IPBES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.002openalex-snapshot
Culturally sensitive boundary work: A framework for linking knowledge to climate action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.005openalex-snapshot
Performing a linear model: The professor group on energy policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.002openalex-snapshot
Navigating the science-policy interface: Forest researcher perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.015openalex-snapshot
Matching institutionalized expertise with global needs: Boundary organizations and hybrid management at the science-policy interfaces of soil and land governance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.026openalex-snapshot
Undone science in climate interventions: Contrasting and contesting anticipatory assessments by expert networks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.014openalex-snapshot
Staging science: Dramaturgical politics of the IPCC's Special Report on 1.5 °C
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.008openalex-snapshot
Effectiveness factors and impacts on policymaking of science-policy interfaces in the environmental sustainability context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103597openalex-snapshot
Knowledge production at the environment-security nexus: Between orthodoxy and transformation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103729openalex-snapshot
A better knowledge is possible: Transforming environmental science for justice and pluralism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103833openalex-snapshot
Navigating dilemmas with formalization of advisory processes: Views of practitioners in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103966openalex-snapshot
Providing a comprehensive thematic review of the Science-Policy Interface (SPI): A probabilistic topic modeling approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103979openalex-snapshot
Unpacking the politics of Nature-based Solutions governance: Making space for transformative change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104143openalex-snapshot
Science advice and policy influence: Views of practitioners in the Swedish Climate Policy Council
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104166openalex-snapshot
To speak truth as, with, and through power: Co-producing knowledge politics of a just transition with Swedish citizens and trade unions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104170openalex-snapshot
Caring policy-relevant knowledge? The case of the Brazilian Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104389openalex-snapshot
Making global environmental assessments fit for future challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103755openalex-snapshot
Climate change adaptation in the Australian electricity sector and the lure of resilience thinking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2022.100150openalex-snapshot
Towards a reflexive, policy-relevant and engaged ocean science for the UN decade: A social science research agenda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2024.100219openalex-snapshot
More than policy neutral: Justifying the power of science-policy interfaces through legitimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100292openalex-snapshot
Advising decision-makers: a new typology of scientific bodies in global environmental governance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.006openalex-snapshot
Are forest researchers only scientists? Case studies on the roles of researchers in Japanese and Swedish forest policy processes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.003openalex-snapshot
Reprint of 'Are forest researchers only scientists? Case studies on the roles of researchers in Japanese and Swedish forest policy processes'
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102076openalex-snapshot
German forest management stakeholders at the science-society interface: Their views on problem definition, knowledge production and research utilization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102134openalex-snapshot
Multiple traps of scientific knowledge transfer: Comparative case studies based on the RIU model from Vietnam, Germany, Indonesia, Japan, and Sweden
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102759openalex-snapshot
Tropical deforestation: Does researchers' direct engagement with decision makers yield more policy impact and what are trade-offs with scientific independence?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.005openalex-snapshot
Boundary spaces: Science, politics and the epistemic geographies of climate change in Copenhagen, 2009
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.01.012openalex-snapshot
Ambivalent climate of opinions: Tensions and dilemmas in understanding geoengineering experimentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.001openalex-snapshot
Assessing the ‘usability’ of climate change research for decision-making: A case study of the Canadian International Polar Year
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.001openalex-snapshot
Fulfilling the promise of participation by not resuscitating the deficit model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102261openalex-snapshot
Knowing like a global expert organization: Comparative insights from the IPCC and IPBES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101558openalex-snapshot
Drowning ‘Truths’: Contrasting experiential-experts’ perceptions with official-experts drowning reports on Australia's hazardous coasts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103532openalex-snapshot
Community-mediated individual disaster preparedness practices: A case study in Kochi, Japan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111213openalex-snapshot
Past peak prominence: The changing role of integrated assessment modeling in the IPCC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.012openalex-snapshot
Science-policy interaction: The case of the forest and forestry revitalisation plan in Japan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.06.019openalex-snapshot
The failure of the mangrove conservation plan in Indonesia: Weak research and an ignorance of grassroots politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.014openalex-snapshot
Failure of science-based win-win solution in fishery management: Learnings from Segara Anakan waters, Central Java, Indonesia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102691openalex-snapshot
When climate justice goes wrong: Maladaptation and deep co-production in transformative environmental science and policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.007openalex-snapshot
Boundaries, breaches, and bridges: The case of Climategate
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.086openalex-snapshot
The anthroposphere as an anticipatory system: Open questions on steering the climate
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106392openalex-snapshot
Advancing UN digital cooperation: Lessons from environmental policy and governance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139149389.006openalex-snapshot
The Challenge of Governing Adaptation in Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1062798725100458openalex-snapshot
A Model at its Limits: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) from the Inside
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s2047102520000084openalex-snapshot
Calculative Practices in International Environmental Governance: In (Partial) Defence of Indicators
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1029/2019ms001687openalex-snapshot
Sociological Perspectives on Earth System Modeling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1029/2021av000418openalex-snapshot
Coordinated Science Support for Sea‐Level Data and Services in the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1029/2023ms003715openalex-snapshot
Updates on Model Hierarchies for Understanding and Simulating the Climate System: A Focus on Data‐Informed Methods and Climate Change Impacts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2954openalex-snapshot
Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00058-1openalex-snapshot
Climate action post-Paris: how can the IPCC stay relevant?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015022openalex-snapshot
Comment se construit la confiance dans les sciences et les politiques du climat ? Retour sur un colloque international
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514509_8openalex-snapshot
Fact-making in Permit Markets: Document Networks as Infrastructures of Emissions Trading
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.58openalex-snapshot
Exploring the science–policy interface on climate change: The role of the IPCC in informing local decision-making in the UK
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0006-8openalex-snapshot
Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-022-00276-wopenalex-snapshot
Is it only about science and policy? The ‘intergovernmental epistemologies’ of global environmental governance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01261-xopenalex-snapshot
Models of science and society: transcending the antagonism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04606-4openalex-snapshot
Citizen participation and technology: lessons from the fields of deliberative democracy and science and technology studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1068/a4629openalex-snapshot
‘Measurementality’ in Biodiversity Governance: Knowledge, Transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1079/9781800624153.0002openalex-snapshot
Who Decides? Choosing Adaptation Tools for Climate Risk: A Post-normal Science Problem
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1298436openalex-snapshot
Deciphering UN development policies: from the modernisation paradigm to the human development approach?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1546561openalex-snapshot
Knowledge uncertainties in environmental conflicts: how the mussel fishery controversy in the Dutch Wadden Sea became depoliticised
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1088937x.2019.1707320openalex-snapshot
Mapping weather, water, ice and climate (WWIC) information providers in Polar Regions: who are they and who do they serve?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1088937x.2024.2359926openalex-snapshot
Redefining Arctic boundaries in a changing climate: interdisciplinary perspectives on governance strategies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2431200openalex-snapshot
Climate change competence—a view of professionals advancing climate change action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2014.943164openalex-snapshot
Toward two narratives of knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2014.962488openalex-snapshot
Science, knowledge, and international relations – a concluding comment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2322642openalex-snapshot
Global environmental assessments and transformative change: the role of epistemic infrastructures and the inclusion of social sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1656180openalex-snapshot
Transformative climate change adaptation: bridging existing approaches with post-foundational insights on justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1673801openalex-snapshot
Understanding climate change as risk: a review of IPCC guidance for decision-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2015.1028419openalex-snapshot
Political materials: rethinking environment, remaking theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1664973openalex-snapshot
Lessons from climate-related planned relocations: the case of Vietnam
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1258317openalex-snapshot
The epistemic quality of expertise: contextualized criteria for the multi-source, negotiated policy advice of stakeholder fora
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1374193openalex-snapshot
One world or two? Science–policy interactions in the climate field
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2019.1665564openalex-snapshot
Going beyond science-policy interaction? An analysis of views among intergovernmental panel on climate change actors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2028173openalex-snapshot
‘Close but not too close’ – experiences of science-policy bridging in three international advisory organizations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2212025openalex-snapshot
‘Better than Doing Nothing’ – constructing support for biodiversity offsetting in Finland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1417330openalex-snapshot
Marine and coastal ecosystem services on the science–policy–practice nexus: challenges and opportunities from 11 European case studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2020.1750094openalex-snapshot
Early-career scientists in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. A moderate or radical path towards a deliberative future?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1891973openalex-snapshot
Expert organizations’ institutional understanding of expertise and responsibility for the creation of the next generation of experts: comparing IPCC and IPBES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2025.2502207openalex-snapshot
Global governance of coastal ecosystems, the making of blue carbon: Co-production, abstraction and enactment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/adf8adopenalex-snapshot
Incorporating social indicators for an equitable carbon budget allocation among different geographical regions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197851746.003.0985openalex-snapshot
Stocktaking IPCC Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190848927.013.10openalex-snapshot
Institutions of Expert Judgment: The Production and Use of Objectivity in Public Expertise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw055openalex-snapshot
The UK’s 2012 Climate Change Risk Assessment: How the rational assessment of science develops policy-based evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ijccsm-04-2022-0049openalex-snapshot
Critical findings of the sixth assessment report (AR6) of working Group I of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) for global climate change policymaking a summary for policymakers (SPM) analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-06-2019-0093openalex-snapshot
Organisation matters: towards an organisational sociology of science communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00307.xopenalex-snapshot
Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12273openalex-snapshot
Boundary Concepts for Boundary Work Between Science and Technology Studies and International Relations: Special Issue Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211740openalex-snapshot
Is Weather Event Attribution Necessary for Adaptation Funding?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061053openalex-snapshot
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-042224-080432openalex-snapshot
Climate Change Loss, Law, and Society
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11492/ceispapers.ceis31.0_35openalex-snapshot
Structured Expert Dialogue における気候変動の気温目標の検討に関する考察 1.5℃と2℃
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00106openalex-snapshot
Politicizing Environmental Science Does Not Mean Denying Climate Science Nor Endorsing It Without Question
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00238openalex-snapshot
Producing Targets for Conservation: Science and Politics at the Tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00269openalex-snapshot
When Does Science Matter? International Relations Meets Science and Technology Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00721openalex-snapshot
From “Loss and Damage” to “Losses and Damages”: Orthographies of Climate Change Loss and Damage in the IPCC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-0148-2015069openalex-snapshot
Accelerating Sustainability: Why Political Economy Matters
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/01622439261450248openalex-snapshot
Politicizing Expertise for Dutch Broad Wellbeing: Knowledge Accountability for Transformative Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/02633957221109541openalex-snapshot
An inquiry into populism’s relation to science
showing the first 200 of 263 · page through all 263
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.