On the public citation graph

A Comparison of Induced Value and Home-Grown Value Experiments to Test for Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9367-4
0 signed · 48 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090304openalex-snapshot
Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.1998.tb00136.xopenalex-snapshot
Experimental Results on Expressed Certainty and Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1006openalex-snapshot
How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1017openalex-snapshot
Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0965openalex-snapshot
Treatment of “Don't-Know” Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1997.0988openalex-snapshot
Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_16openalex-snapshot
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-3332-zopenalex-snapshot
A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-4224-yopenalex-snapshot
Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Hypothetical Bias in a Provision Point Mechanism?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-5264-zopenalex-snapshot
Laboratory Testbeds and Non-Market Valuation: The Case of Bidding Behavior in a Second-Price Auction with an Outside Option
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9011-5openalex-snapshot
Induced-Value Tests of Contingent Valuation Elicitation Mechanisms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9281-9openalex-snapshot
Demand Revelation, Hypothetical Bias, and Threshold Public Goods Provision
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.033openalex-snapshot
The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism is not necessarily incentive compatible, even for non-random goods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.09.006openalex-snapshot
Cheap talk reconsidered: New evidence from CVM
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2003.06.004openalex-snapshot
Revealing consumers' willingness-to-pay: A comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey auction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00041-4openalex-snapshot
Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-0696(03)00022-6openalex-snapshot
An experimental investigation of explanations for inconsistencies in responses to second offers in double referenda
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(00)00410-9openalex-snapshot
Induced-value tests of the referendum voting mechanism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00165-2openalex-snapshot
A random nth-price auction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(03)00024-6openalex-snapshot
Experimental evidence on deliberate misrepresentation in referendum contingent valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(96)00104-8openalex-snapshot
A constructive approach to environmental valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0722(07)00081-9openalex-snapshot
Chapter 81 Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00001926openalex-snapshot
Rational Roots of “Irrational” Behavior: New Theories of Economic Decision-Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1068280500005761openalex-snapshot
Contingent Valuation, Hypothetical Bias, and Experimental Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011604818385openalex-snapshot
Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012791822804openalex-snapshot
What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020242907259openalex-snapshot
Provision Point Mechanisms and Field Validity Tests of Contingent Valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/b:exec.0000026975.48587.f0openalex-snapshot
Experimental Methods and Elicitation of Values
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/000368498325633openalex-snapshot
An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00136openalex-snapshot
Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling with Detection and Mitigation of Hypothetical Bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00492openalex-snapshot
Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness‐to‐Pay for Golden Rice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01713.xopenalex-snapshot
PAYOFF DOMINANCE VS. COGNITIVE TRANSPARENCY IN DECISION MAKING
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491openalex-snapshot
On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054201387openalex-snapshot
The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.991openalex-snapshot
The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.649openalex-snapshot
Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1498openalex-snapshot
Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sportscards
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968openalex-snapshot
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3146711openalex-snapshot
How Precise Are Monetary Representations of Environmental Improvements?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3147257openalex-snapshot
A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009079.00011openalex-snapshot
Behavioral foundations of environmental economics and valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847203045.00007openalex-snapshot
Market Price Endogeneity and Accuracy of Value Elicitation Mechanisms

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2101978openalex-extracted
What is the Right Profile for Getting a Job? A Stated Choice Experiment of the Recruitment Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2526747openalex-extracted
Game Form Misconceptions Are Not Necessary for a Willingness-to-Pay vs. Willingness-to-Accept Gap
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4476764openalex-extracted
Simplicity Refinements and Value Elicitation: What Outperforms the BDM on Initial Play?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9741-0openalex-snapshot
Hypothetical Bias Reconsidered: Payment and Provision Uncertainties in a Threshold Provision Mechanism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18174/466451openalex-snapshot
Effects of land-use change on grassland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia and their implications for livelihoods and sustainable management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.23860/diss-kafle-achyut-2014openalex-snapshot
INCENTIVES, VALUES AND PROVISION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RESTORATION
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.