On the public citation graph

Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-012-9342-8
0 signed · 132 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027openalex-snapshot
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01669303openalex-snapshot
Volunteers and Pseudo-Volunteers: The Effect of Recruitment Method in Dictator Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9192-yopenalex-snapshot
Do people behave in experiments as in the field?—evidence from donations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9193-xopenalex-snapshot
Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.03.006openalex-snapshot
On representative social capital
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.004openalex-snapshot
Trust, risk and betrayal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.010openalex-snapshot
The robustness of trust and reciprocity across a heterogeneous U.S. population
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.02.011openalex-snapshot
Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.04.006openalex-snapshot
Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.09.011openalex-snapshot
Preferences, beliefs and equilibrium: What have experiments taught us?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.07.005openalex-snapshot
Risk-attitude selection bias in subject pools for experiments involving neuroimaging and blood samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.03.004openalex-snapshot
Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: Experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-8256(03)00119-2openalex-snapshot
How to identify trust and reciprocity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009422314.012openalex-snapshot
Behavioral Game Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043424openalex-snapshot
On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061411openalex-snapshot
Differences between volunteers and non-volunteers for psychological studies.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/342894openalex-snapshot
Partial Gift Exchange in an Experimental Labor Market: Impact of Subject Population Differences, Productivity Differences, and Effort Requests on Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00302openalex-snapshot
Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00412.xopenalex-snapshot
Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02025.xopenalex-snapshot
Bargaining Outside the Lab – A Newspaper Experiment of a Three‐Person Ultimatum Game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12019openalex-snapshot
DO LAB EXPERIMENTS MISREPRESENT SOCIAL PREFERENCES? THE CASE OF SELF-SELECTED STUDENT SAMPLES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700openalex-snapshot
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805775014407openalex-snapshot
Using Experimental Economics to Measure Social Capital and Predict Financial Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051054661530openalex-snapshot
Interdependent Preferences and Reciprocity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.4.781openalex-snapshot
Gaming Against Managers in Incentive Systems: Experimental Results with Chinese Students and Chinese Managers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.73openalex-snapshot
In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1449openalex-snapshot
A Dual-Self Model of Impulse Control
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1652openalex-snapshot
Incentives and Prosocial Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1278openalex-snapshot
Selection Bias, Demographic Effects, and Ability Effects in Common Value Auction Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448openalex-snapshot
Gender Differences in Preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.159openalex-snapshot
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.153openalex-snapshot
What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.2.159openalex-snapshot
Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1666581openalex-snapshot
Is There Selection Bias in Laboratory Experiments?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1731193openalex-snapshot
Self Selection Does Not Increase Other-Regarding Preferences Among Adult Laboratory Subjects, But Student Subjects May Be More Self-Regarding than Adults
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2158007openalex-snapshot
Opting-In: Participation Biases in the Lab
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.299143openalex-snapshot
Measuring Social Norms and Preferences Using Experimental Games: A Guide for Social Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1421418openalex-snapshot
The Volunteer Subject
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352openalex-snapshot
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2232497openalex-snapshot
Attitudes Toward Risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2554770openalex-snapshot
Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15openalex-snapshot
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzsmff5openalex-snapshot
The Handbook of Experimental Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.726openalex-snapshot
The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism - Experimental Evidence and New Theories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-6385openalex-snapshot
Freefall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.82444/warw.33664753openalex-snapshot
Experimental economics : rethinking the rules

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1977749openalex-extracted
The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2334738openalex-extracted
Tacit Coordination in Games with Third-Party Externalities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694611openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2742555openalex-extracted
Lab Measures of Other-Regarding Preferences Can Predict Some Related On-the-Job Behavior: Evidence from a Large Scale Field Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2884409openalex-extracted
Conducting Interactive Experiments Online
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3068380openalex-extracted
On the Validity of Cost-Saving Payment Methods in Dictator-Game Experiments: A Systematic Test
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3237911openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3313734openalex-extracted
The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More Of)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3478032openalex-extracted
Selection into Experiments: Evidence from a Population of Students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4010959openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4767248openalex-extracted
The Missing Type: Where are the Inequality Averse (Students)?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4772582openalex-extracted
The Missing Type: Where are the Inequality Averse (Students)?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12392openalex-snapshot
The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93363-4_2openalex-snapshot
Methodological Foundations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-015-0945-9openalex-snapshot
Subjective beliefs about the income distribution and preferences for redistribution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00469-7openalex-snapshot
A Single-Item Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Measure for Assessing Depression Among College Students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-014-9397-9openalex-snapshot
Self-selection into laboratory experiments: pro-social motives versus monetary incentives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9527-2openalex-snapshot
Conducting interactive experiments online
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09696-2openalex-snapshot
State lottery in the lab: an experiment in external validity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-024-09840-2openalex-snapshot
Do participation rates vary with participation payments in laboratory experiments?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-022-01028-7openalex-snapshot
Local income inequality, rent-seeking detection, and equalization: a laboratory experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-015-9228-1openalex-snapshot
Loving the long shot: Risk taking with skewed lotteries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-015-0004-4openalex-snapshot
Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-017-0036-zopenalex-snapshot
Experienced vs. inexperienced participants in the lab: do they behave differently?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-017-0043-0openalex-snapshot
The limits of guilt
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-024-00179-1openalex-snapshot
Eager beavers v. lazy slugs: selection effects in experiments with social preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.02.012openalex-snapshot
Monetary incentives versus class credit: Evidence from a large classroom trust experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.08.037openalex-snapshot
Are we underestimating inequality aversion? Comparing recruited and classroom subjects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.03.006openalex-snapshot
The effect of power imbalances on incentives to make non-contractible investments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.07.012openalex-snapshot
The incentive effects of missions—Evidence from experiments with NGO employees and students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.07.019openalex-snapshot
Coordination with third-party externalities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.013openalex-snapshot
Opting-in: Participation bias in economic experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.002openalex-snapshot
Experimental methods: Extra-laboratory experiments-extending the reach of experimental economics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.011openalex-snapshot
Is avatar-to-avatar communication as effective as face-to-face communication? An Ultimatum Game experiment in First and Second Life
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.006openalex-snapshot
Who is coming to the artefactual field experiment? Participation bias among Chinese rural migrants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.12.007openalex-snapshot
Partner selection into policy relevant field experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.03.006openalex-snapshot
Social dilemmas in the laboratory and in the field
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.006openalex-snapshot
Defaults and dishonesty – Evidence from a representative sample in the lab
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.01.014openalex-snapshot
Does the response to competition depend on perceived ability? Evidence from a classroom experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.003openalex-snapshot
Norms in the lab: Inexperienced versus experienced participants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.031openalex-snapshot
Reservation wages and labor supply
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.04.033openalex-snapshot
Fairness preferences revisited
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.01.003openalex-snapshot
Old age and prosocial behavior: Social preferences or experimental confounds?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102387openalex-snapshot
Dictator game variants with probabilistic (and cost-saving) payoffs: A systematic test
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.06.003openalex-snapshot
From the field to the lab. An experiment on the representativeness of standard laboratory subjects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101521openalex-snapshot
The ethics of student participation in economic experiments: Arguments and evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2022.101871openalex-snapshot
Selection into experiments: New evidence on the role of preferences, cognition, and recruitment protocols
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2022.101954openalex-snapshot
Competition, subjective feedback, and gender gaps in performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.101986openalex-snapshot
Subject confusion and task non-completion: Methodological insights from an artefactual field experiment with adolescents in India
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102183openalex-snapshot
Gender effects in dictator game giving under voluntary choice of the recipient’s gender: Women favour female recipients
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102534openalex-snapshot
Convergent and external validity of risk preferences elicitation methods: Evidence from Vietnam
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06972-yopenalex-snapshot
Optimally generate policy-based evidence before scaling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep01213openalex-snapshot
Experimental subjects are not different
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026112118openalex-snapshot
Converging evidence for greater male variability in time, risk, and social preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/701681openalex-snapshot
Experimenting with Measurement Error: Techniques with Applications to the Caltech Cohort Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru035openalex-snapshot
Getting policy-makers to listen to field experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12529openalex-snapshot
External validity of economic experiments on Agri‐environmental scheme design
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12254openalex-snapshot
A side effect of a broker's expertise in clientelism: A lab‐experimental study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/caje.70008openalex-snapshot
“The risks cannot be compensated”: The willingness to donate DNA for science and its relationship with economic preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12359openalex-snapshot
TRUST, TRUSTWORTHINESS, AND BUSINESS SUCCESS: LAB AND FIELD FINDINGS FROM ENTREPRENEURS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12350openalex-snapshot
Preferences and Biases in Educational Choices and Labour Market Expectations: Shrinking the Black Box of Gender
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12019openalex-snapshot
DO LAB EXPERIMENTS MISREPRESENT SOCIAL PREFERENCES? THE CASE OF SELF-SELECTED STUDENT SAMPLES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12523openalex-snapshot
Social preferences and sales performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12328openalex-snapshot
Opening up the black box: Technological transparency and prevention
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12326openalex-snapshot
Students Cheat More: Comparing the Dishonesty of a Student Sample and a Representative Sample in the Laboratory*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1527002517717299openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Physical Activity on Social Interactions: The Case of Trust and Trustworthiness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181065openalex-snapshot
Testing the Waters: Behavior across Participant Pools
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1985openalex-snapshot
Corporate Philanthropy and Productivity: Evidence from an Online Real Effort Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2294openalex-snapshot
A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2870openalex-snapshot
Wage Elasticities in Working and Volunteering: The Role of Reference Points in a Laboratory Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2908openalex-snapshot
On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4562openalex-snapshot
Social Preferences of Young Professionals and the Financial Industry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187840openalex-snapshot
One-shot exogenous interventions increase subsequent coordination in Denmark, Spain and Ghana
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15126/thesis.00851831openalex-snapshot
Handling multiple demands in academia : does gender play a role?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883172-005openalex-snapshot
4. Other-Regarding Preferences A Selective Survey of Experimental Results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ekm95openalex-snapshot
External validity of social experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w20877openalex-snapshot
Do Natural Field Experiments Afford Researchers More or Less Control than Laboratory Experiments? A Simple Model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w20953openalex-snapshot
Who Is Coming to the Artefactual Field Experiment? Participation Bias among Chinese Rural Migrants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w21517openalex-snapshot
Experimenting with Measurement Error: Techniques with Applications to the Caltech Cohort Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w24781openalex-snapshot
Testing the Waters: Behavior across Participant Pools
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w25451openalex-snapshot
The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/g12010018openalex-snapshot
Lab-Sophistication: Does Repeated Participation in Laboratory Experiments Affect Pro-Social Behaviour?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050240openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Different Saving Mechanisms in Pension Saving Behavior: Evidence from a Life-Cycle Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.56506/fcyt4789openalex-snapshot
Convergent and External Validity of Risk Preference Elicitation Methods: Evidence from Viet Nam
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5817/wp_muni_econ_2021-06openalex-snapshot
Lab-Sophistication: Does Repeated Participation in Laboratory Experiments Affect Pro-Social Behaviour?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/0806d2a0za136z479cz8123za86c8c72e986openalex-snapshot
Empirical Investigations on the Behavioral Determinants of Political Decisions
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.