CiteStamp
On the public citation graph
An Empirical Test of the Behaviour Analysis Interview.
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository
metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is
labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not
evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated
CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
What points at this work Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2872 openalex-snapshot ‘What Would You Say if You Were Guilty?’ Suspects' Strategies During a Hypothetical Behavior Analysis Interview Concerning a Serious Crime
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4030 openalex-snapshot Juveniles and adults differ in their beliefs about cues to deception and strategies during a hypothetical police interview
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.865 openalex-snapshot Effects of false‐evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.145 openalex-snapshot Maximising Opportunities to Detect Verbal Deception: Training Police Officers to Interview Tactically
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1476 openalex-snapshot Lay perceptions of interrogation techniques: Identifying the role of Belief in a Just World and Right Wing Authoritarianism
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.32 openalex-snapshot Processes underlying deception: an empirical analysis of truth and lies when manipulating the stakes
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.024 openalex-snapshot Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex specifically processes general – but not personal – knowledge deception: Multiple brain networks for lying
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023741 openalex-snapshot Stereotype threat in criminal interrogations: Why innocent Black suspects are at risk for confessing falsely.
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1949954 openalex-snapshot Simulating Interrogation in the Lab: Examining the Effectiveness of Physical Pain, Coercive Verbal Pressure, and Rapport-Building for Obtaining Reliable Information
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12066 openalex-snapshot The Accuracy of Auditors' and Layered Voice Analysis ( LVA ) Operators' Judgments of Truth and Deception During Police Questioning*
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12214 openalex-snapshot The language of high‐stakes truths and lies: Linguistic analysis of true and deceptive statements made during sexual homicide interrogations
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.11113/itlj.v7.116 openalex-snapshot Unmasking Reliable News: An Investigation of University Students' Search for Trustworthy Information during the Pandemic
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506x143958 openalex-snapshot Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration … or is it? An investigation of the impact of motivation and feedback on deception detection
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-16958 openalex-snapshot Understanding how shared expectations can shape reality: an examination of the underlying mechanisms in the accumulation of perceptual bias effects
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.32920/22096157 openalex-snapshot The Analysis of Nonverbal Communication: The Dangers of Pseudoscience in Security and Justice Contexts
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2019a9 openalex-snapshot The Analysis of Nonverbal Communication: The Dangers of Pseudoscience in Security and Justice Contexts
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2024a6 openalex-snapshot Improving Witnesses’ Recollection by Reinforcing the Cognitive Interview: The 5Ws Questions as an Information-gathering Method
inferred ← cites https://doi.org/10.70478/rips.2011.02.01 openalex-snapshot Estudio de la Eficacia de las Categorías de Realidad del Testimonio del Sistema de Evaluación Global (SEG) en Casos de Violencia de Género
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID:
icsacinstitute.org/submit .