On the public citation graph
‘Hoisted with our own petard’: evidence and democratic deliberation on obesity
0 signed · 124 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0127-4openalex-snapshot
Genomics, Obesity and the Struggle over Responsibilities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0127-4_3openalex-snapshot
Behaviour, Environment or Body: Three Discourses on Obesity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.10.001openalex-snapshot
Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist “trio” supporting the backlash against global warming
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00250-0openalex-snapshot
Achieving clinical behaviour change: a case of becoming indeterminate
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1449-4035(06)70076-5openalex-snapshot
“Every Virus Tells a Story”: Toward a Narrative-Centred Approach to Health Policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/b:olic.0000035505.23131.80openalex-snapshot
Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2011.626315openalex-snapshot
Turtles all the way down: bounded rationality in an evidence-based age
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.786675openalex-snapshot
Julia Gillard's Citizens' Assembly Proposal for Australia: A Deliberative Democratic Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.527620openalex-snapshot
Shifting the Balance: The Contemporary Narrative of Obesity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.802464openalex-snapshot
Interpretive research design: concepts and processes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2007.9518523openalex-snapshot
Praxis stories: Experiencing interpretive policy research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/019829333x.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Politics of Environmental Discourse
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572915.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Developing positive approaches to nutrition education and the prevention of child and adolescent obesity: First, do no harm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00414.xopenalex-snapshot
Medical modernisation, scientific research fields and the epistemic politics of health social movements
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789x.2007.00338.xopenalex-snapshot
Overcoming policy cacophony on obesity: an ecological public health framework for policymakers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00674.xopenalex-snapshot
The Limits to Evidence‐Based Policy: Evidence, Emotion and Criminal Justice1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923x.2006.00822.xopenalex-snapshot
Leaps of Faith in the Obesity Debate: a Cautionary Note for Policy Note for Policy‐makers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.xopenalex-snapshot
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00452.xopenalex-snapshot
Health Policy and the Politics of Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00440.xopenalex-snapshot
It's About Time: Catching Method Up to Meaning-The Usefulness of Narrative Inquiry in Public Administration Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538openalex-snapshot
D ELIBERATIVE D EMOCRATIC T HEORY
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539203000402openalex-snapshot
The Strength of Loose Concepts — Boundary Concepts, Federative Experimental Strategies and Disciplinary Growth: The Case of Immunology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670201700304openalex-snapshot
From Muddling Through to Muddling Up - Evidence Based Policy Making and the Modernisation of British Government
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363openalex-snapshot
Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909700300105openalex-snapshot
Evaluation as Practical Hermeneutics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-596openalex-snapshot
Evaluating the use of citizens’ juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2006.17873openalex-snapshot
Reframing Evidence Synthesis As Rhetorical Action in the Policy Making Drama
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781861341914.001.0001openalex-snapshot
What works?Evidence-based policy and practice in public services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2007000200030openalex-snapshot
The obesity epidemic: science, morality and ideology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2070471openalex-snapshot
Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782482openalex-snapshot
Policy analysis, science and politics: from 'speaking truth to power' to 'making sense together'
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329208openalex-snapshot
Political Communication and Deliberation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02189.xopenalex-snapshot
Australia: the healthiest country by 2020
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-1513openalex-snapshot
The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-2937openalex-snapshot
The Work of policy: an international survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-5848openalex-snapshot
Political communication and deliberation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2324.003.0010openalex-snapshot
Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2440179openalex-extracted
Instrumental Choice, Academic Practices and Framing in the Process of Governing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9209-2openalex-snapshot
Evidence and policy: discourses, meanings and practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9275-3openalex-snapshot
How policies become contested: a spiral of imagination and evidence in a large infrastructure project
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-024-09527-8openalex-snapshot
Enlightenment, politicisation or mere window dressing? Europeanisation and the use of evidence for policy making in Bulgaria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.019openalex-snapshot
Evidence-based arguments in direct democracy: The case of smoking bans in Switzerland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.09.006openalex-snapshot
The contribution of evaluations to the discourse quality of newspaper content
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103097openalex-snapshot
Agenda-setting in local food environment policy: A comparative Multiple Streams Analysis of the City Deal network in the Netherlands
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108561563openalex-snapshot
The Art and Craft of Comparison
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592437openalex-snapshot
Hyper-active Governance: How Governments Manage the Politics of Expertise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592437.002openalex-snapshot
Managing the ‘Expert–Politics Nexus’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592437.006openalex-snapshot
Defend, Empower and Include
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592437.007openalex-snapshot
Frenetically Standing Still
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592437.008openalex-snapshot
Experts, Politics and Co-Production
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592437.010openalex-snapshot
Hyper-active Governance and Social Acceleration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592437.011openalex-snapshot
Crosstabs of Media Coverage of Herceptin
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773923000358openalex-snapshot
Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0045-9openalex-snapshot
Three lessons from evidence-based medicine and policy: increase transparency, balance inputs and understand power
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00821-xopenalex-snapshot
Insights from a cross-sector review on how to conceptualise the quality of use of research evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05159-2openalex-snapshot
Salient and contested scientific evidence in debates over sustainable transformation: pesticide policymaking in Switzerland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2054452openalex-snapshot
A framework for understanding the quality of evidence use in education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1065966openalex-snapshot
Toxic narratives in the deliberative system: how the ghost of Nanny stalks the obesity debate
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1010561openalex-snapshot
Stoic Democrats? Anti-politics, élite cynicism and the policy process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2019.1600447openalex-snapshot
Framing the Debate: The Status of US Sex Education Policy and the Dual Narratives of Abstinence-Only Versus Comprehensive Sex Education Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.971039openalex-snapshot
Embracing impressionism: revealing the brush strokes of interpretive research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1208108openalex-snapshot
Arguing about smoking bans: the role of evidence in the social construction of conflicting policy ideas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1232345openalex-snapshot
Democratic illusion. Deliberative democracy in Canadian public policy, by Genevieve Fuji Johnson
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2018.1506349openalex-snapshot
A relational perspective on deliberative systems: combining interpretive and structural analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2180401openalex-snapshot
Media and the staging of policy controversy: obesity and the UK sugar tax
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848789.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Magical Thinking in Public Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848789.003.0001openalex-snapshot
Naïve ideals in cynical times
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848789.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Conceptualizing magical thinking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848789.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Evidence-based policymaking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848789.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Citizen engagement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.30openalex-snapshot
Governance Networks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puad019openalex-snapshot
Knowledge–practice gap in healthcare payments: the role of policy capacity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad021openalex-snapshot
Evidence-neglect: addressing a barrier to UK health and climate policy ambitions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12295openalex-snapshot
Lessons from the evidence on evidence‐based policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12285openalex-snapshot
What makes evidence‐based policy making such a useful myth? The case of NICE guidance on bariatric surgery in the United Kingdom
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12391openalex-snapshot
Conflict reconsidered: The boomerang effect of depoliticization in the policy process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12923openalex-snapshot
The Political Use of Evidence and Its Contribution to Democratic Discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00016993251322875openalex-snapshot
Scientification of politics or politicisation of science? Parliamentary committee hearings on the Finnish alcohol policy reforms in 1994 and 2017 as epistemic work
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211047219openalex-snapshot
Citizens and Evaluation: A Review of Evaluation Models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116630232openalex-snapshot
The performance of political narratives: How Australia and Britain’s ‘fat bombs’ fizzled out
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3639-zopenalex-snapshot
The application of theories of the policy process to obesity prevention: a systematic review and meta-synthesis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1332/030557315x14502713105886openalex-snapshot
Studying public deliberation after the systemic turn: the crucial role for interpretive research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1332/030557321x16836237135216openalex-snapshot
How evidence-based policymaking helps and hinders policy conflict
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302864openalex-snapshot
Exploring evidence use and capacity for health services management and planning in Swiss health administrations: A mixed-method interview study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912022281237openalex-snapshot
An empirically oriented analysis of deliberative and participatory systems: health and policy for women's councils and conferences in Minas Gerais
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.108.6044openalex-snapshot
A critical analysis of obesity prevention policies and strategies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.108.6559openalex-snapshot
Authors’ response to Invited Commentary by Brady and Beausoleil
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18573/jcads.138openalex-snapshot
‘Following the science’. Science* as a sociopolitical keyword during the pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/8grp4openalex-snapshot
How Policies Become Contested: A Spiral of Imagination and Evidence in a Large Infrastructure Project.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2016-046openalex-snapshot
How Research–Policy Partnerships Can Benefit Government: A Win–Win for Evidence-Based Policy-Making
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.