On the public citation graph

On-line false belief understanding qua folk psychology?

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-012-9270-2
0 signed · 26 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5558-4_13openalex-snapshot
From Folk Psychology to Commonsense
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9010-yopenalex-snapshot
Folk psychology’ is not folk psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9230-5openalex-snapshot
It’s in your nature: a pluralistic folk psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0065-0openalex-snapshot
The Direct-Perception Model of Empathy: a Critique
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0067-yopenalex-snapshot
On the Long Road to Mentalism in Children’s Spontaneous False-Belief Understanding: Are We There Yet?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0080-1openalex-snapshot
In Defense of Phenomenological Approaches to Social Cognition: Interacting with the Critics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.10.007openalex-snapshot
Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.12.010openalex-snapshot
Deep and dynamic interaction: Response to Hanne De Jaegher
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.01.002openalex-snapshot
What made me want the cheese? A reply to Shaun Gallagher and Dan Hutto
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00064-7openalex-snapshot
Limits on theory of mind use in adults
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511599729.011openalex-snapshot
Folk Psychology and the Biological Basis of Intersubjectivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x09000545openalex-snapshot
How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246105056109openalex-snapshot
Folk Psychology and the Biological Basis of Intersubjectivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790802239243openalex-snapshot
Some ways to understand people
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790802239268openalex-snapshot
Folk psychological and phenomenological accounts of social perception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790802302306openalex-snapshot
The (in)visibility of others: a reply to Herschbach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910601183549openalex-snapshot
Simulation trouble
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/0199271941.001.0001openalex-snapshot
How the Body Shapes the Mind
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00211openalex-snapshot
Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01944.xopenalex-snapshot
Action Anticipation Through Attribution of False Belief by 2-Year-Olds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01383.xopenalex-snapshot
Embodied Cognition and Mindreading
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107621openalex-snapshot
Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002320620316openalex-snapshot
A new false belief test for 36‐month‐olds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201openalex-snapshot
Journal of Consciousness Studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5824.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Reconstructing the Cognitive World

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4282908openalex-extracted
Stasis and Theory of Mind for First Year Composition: A Transdisciplinary Exploration
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.