On the public citation graph

Conceptual analysis and special-interest science: toxicology and the case of Edward Calabrese

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9792-5

0 signed · 74 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.2.220openalex-snapshot

Update on JAMA's Conflict of Interest Policy

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/faat.1993.1119openalex-snapshot

Endometriosis in Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Following Chronic Exposure to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4052-2_19openalex-snapshot

Evaluation of Genetic Risks

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(87)90657-3openalex-snapshot

A history and theory of informed consent

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(74)90123-7openalex-snapshot

Evaluation of genetic risks of alkylating agents: Tissue doses in the mouse from air contaminated with ethylene oxide

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-008x(78)90075-3openalex-snapshot

Results of a two-year chronic toxicity and oncogenicity study of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rats

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(07)68177-0openalex-snapshot

Principles of Biomedical Ethics

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01719-3openalex-snapshot

Hormesis: U-shaped dose responses and their centrality in toxicology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511617713openalex-snapshot

Toxic Torts: Science, Law, and the Possibility of Justice

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620409.040openalex-snapshot

A Treatise of Human Nature

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006977728215openalex-snapshot

Hormesis: A Highly Generalizable and Reproducible Phenomenon With Important Implications for Risk Assessment

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011961527452openalex-snapshot

Using A Thought Experiment To Clarify A Radiobiological Controversy

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/421691aopenalex-snapshot

Toxicology rethinks its central belief

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990804.0013openalex-snapshot

Cellular and molecular biology.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648609513478openalex-snapshot

A history and theory of informed consent

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2008.0528openalex-snapshot

Evidentiary Standards and Animal Data

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/0195152034.001.0001openalex-snapshot

Environmental Justice

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195325461.001.0001openalex-snapshot

Taking Action, Saving Lives

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199011000-00001openalex-snapshot

Statistics in Nonrandomized Studies

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199011000-00003openalex-snapshot

Randomization, Statistics, and Causal Inference

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00643.xopenalex-snapshot

Ethics and public health

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1969.tb02235.xopenalex-snapshot

The mutagenic effect of low concentrations of ethylene oxide in air

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.140223openalex-snapshot

Hormesis: The Dose-Response Revolution

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.1.12openalex-snapshot

Statistical Significance in Biology: Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient for Hypothesis Acceptance

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327108098491openalex-snapshot

Ideological toxicology: invalid logic, science, ethics about low-dose pollution

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/096032719601500113openalex-snapshot

Biological effects of low level exposures

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2004.10.3.335openalex-snapshot

“Hormesis”—An Inappropriate Extrapolation from the Specific to the Universal

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1191/0960327102ht217oaopenalex-snapshot

Defining hormesis

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1191/0960327105ht523oaopenalex-snapshot

Hormesis: how it could affect the risk assessment process

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.114-1764167openalex-snapshot

Hormesis Is Biology, Not Religion

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.114-a176aopenalex-snapshot

Sour Finding on Popular Sweetener: Increased Cancer Incidence Associated with Low-Dose Aspartame Intake

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6200openalex-snapshot

Objectivity and ethics in environmental health science.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6522openalex-snapshot

Pesticide testing in humans: ethics and public policy.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7811openalex-snapshot

Fundamental Flaws of Hormesis for Public Health Decisions

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8606openalex-snapshot

The Importance of Hormesis to Public Health

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.95103142openalex-snapshot

Strange Brew: Assessing Risk of Chemical Mixtures

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520320789openalex-snapshot

Risk and Rationality

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520913967openalex-snapshot

Burying Uncertainty

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17226/10927openalex-snapshot

Intentional Human Dosing Studies for EPA Regulatory Purposes

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.11.1908openalex-snapshot

Human Testing of Pesticides: Ethical and Scientific Considerations

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1313596openalex-snapshot

Reevaluation of the Fundamental Dose–Response Relationship

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1399238openalex-snapshot

Toward a New Philosophy of Biology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452225814.n14openalex-snapshot

Ethics in Scientific Research

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-5624openalex-snapshot

Ethics of scientific research

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-3233openalex-snapshot

Taking action, saving lives: our duties to protect environmental and public health

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009openalex-snapshot

Principles of Biomedical Ethics

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3253778openalex-extracted

Под давлением научного "консенсуса". Современная версия диктатуры мудрецов и рекомендации ответственному политику (How One Could Make Responsible Decisions Under Scientific Consensus’ Pressure. Philosophers – Kings of Nowadays and Policy Advice for the Politicians)

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93329-6_4openalex-snapshot

Jeopardizing Discoverability

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59256-5_8openalex-snapshot

Human Creative Abduction Assaulted

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68992-9_8openalex-snapshot

Doing Violence to the Production of Scientific Knowledge

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9482-3openalex-snapshot

Non-cognitive Values and Methodological Learning in the Decision-Oriented Sciences

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-026-09778-4openalex-snapshot

Delineating the Legitimate Role of Values in Science

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1479-8openalex-snapshot

The harms of ignoring the social nature of science

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-03007-1openalex-snapshot

Pathways of influence: understanding the impact of philosophy of science in scientific domains

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05508-xopenalex-snapshot

How philosophy of science can enhance research in science and engineering: the benefits, challenges, and ideal conditions for philosophy-STEM collaborations

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9773-2openalex-snapshot

Risk, Uncertainty and Precaution in Science: The Threshold of the Toxicological Concern Approach in Food Toxicology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-40555-6.00012-1openalex-snapshot

Challenges, perspectives, and ethical issues of nanobiotechnology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.01.032openalex-snapshot

Lessons to be learned from a contentious challenge to mainstream radiobiological science (the linear no-threshold theory of genetic mutations)

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.028openalex-snapshot

How prevalent is chemical hormesis in the natural and experimental worlds?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.233openalex-snapshot

Temporal stability of chemical hormesis (CH): Is CH just a temporary stop on the road to thresholds and toxic responses?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2013.8openalex-snapshot

Scientific dissent and public policy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2021.2004467openalex-snapshot

Policy Styles and Epistemic Policies in the Regulation of Health Claims. A Comparison of Europe, the United States, and Japan

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2012.700882openalex-snapshot

Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges Filed by Edward Calabrese

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/713891openalex-snapshot

A Framework for Analyzing Broadly Engaged Philosophy of Science

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1089/env.2012.0002openalex-snapshot

University Environmental-Justice Whistleblowers Versus Industry Retaliators: Dow Chemical, Union Carbide, and Edward Calabrese

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0355openalex-snapshot

Philosophy of Risk

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/hp.0000000000002052openalex-snapshot

Confessions of an LNT Heretic: What Happens When You Challenge Biomedical and Environmental Dogma: Rebuttal of Beyea Commentary 2024

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/hp.0000000000002144openalex-snapshot

The Evolution of the Linear No-Threshold Model in Radiation Protection: Insights from a Bibliometric Perspective

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12580openalex-snapshot

False allegations of research misconduct

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00151openalex-snapshot

Who's Afraid of Dissent? Addressing Concerns about Undermining Scientific Consensus in Public Policy Developments

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914521019openalex-snapshot

Values and Decisions

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21308/recp.55.04openalex-snapshot

Políticas epistémicas y gobernanza. Un análisis comparativo de las regulaciones norteamericana y europea sobre declaraciones de propiedades saludables

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/biom13101512openalex-snapshot

The Hormesis Concept: Strengths and Shortcomings

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2015.1.56openalex-snapshot

Resolving scientific controversy over smelter risks and neurodegenerative effects of metals

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.