On the public citation graph

Transatlantic Divergences in Citizen Science Ethics—Comparative Analysis of the DIYbio Code of Ethics Drafts of 2011

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0197-7
0 signed · 25 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(09)60038-5openalex-snapshot
Amateur biologists play with DNA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/467650aopenalex-snapshot
Garage biotech: Life hackers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.299.5609.977openalex-snapshot
Public Engagement with Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467609336308openalex-snapshot
Participatory Paradoxes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-2210446openalex-snapshot
Framing the Contested History of Digital Culture

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3490006openalex-extracted
Finding a Regulatory Balance for Genetic Biohacking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119537151.ch16openalex-snapshot
Biohacking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.175openalex-snapshot
Unconventional settings and uses of human enhancement technologies: A non‐systematic review of public and experts' views on self‐enhancement and DIY biology/biohacking risks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0253-6openalex-snapshot
What Ethics for Bioart?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102653openalex-snapshot
A new ethos for science? Exploring emerging DIY science “qualities”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120127openalex-snapshot
Do-it-yourself (DiY) science: The proliferation, relevance and concerns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120206openalex-snapshot
The rise of biohacking: Tracing the emergence and evolution of DIY biology through online discussions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-016-0033-0openalex-snapshot
Fringe biotechnology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2openalex-snapshot
Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2021.1976606openalex-snapshot
Deviance and Ethical Considerations in Online Biohacking Communities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2022.2028135openalex-snapshot
The Promissory Visions of DIYbio: Reimaging Science from the Fringe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1937978openalex-snapshot
What it takes to make it: profile and characteristics of DIY bio laboratory founders
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-016-0039-1openalex-snapshot
DIY-Bio – economic, epistemological and ethical implications and ambivalences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1openalex-snapshot
Mapping do-it-yourself science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.4279.9448openalex-snapshot
We are Biohackers: Exploring the Collective Identity of the DIYbio Movement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i16.y2021.002openalex-snapshot
«Biohacking»: el transhumanismo de garaje
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2019-0027openalex-snapshot
Zwischen Science Fantasy und ontologischer Politik. Künstlerischer Technomaterialismus jenseits der Geschlechtergrenzen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/is4si-2017-04119openalex-snapshot
Biohacking: New Do-It-Yourself Practices as Technoscientific Work between Freedom and Necessity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/0aa2261ez728dz4821z9acaza69b463e5203openalex-snapshot
A la marge des sciences institutionnelles, philosophie et anthropologie de l'éthique du mouvement de biohacking en France
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7152/acro.v26i1.14976openalex-snapshot
Structural (In)visibility: Possible Effects of Constructing a Controlled Vocabulary in a Niche Domain
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.