On the public citation graph

Konzeption und Implementierung eines Werkzeuges zur automatisierten Identifikation und Analyse von Argumentationsstrukturen anhand der Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts im Digital-Humanities-Projekt ARGUMENTUM

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-014-0175-9
0 signed · 19 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5openalex-snapshot
Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma-Dialectical Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03424-4_37openalex-snapshot
Identifying the Content Zones of German Court Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_4openalex-snapshot
Approaches to Text Mining Arguments from Legal Cases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15402-7_35openalex-snapshot
A Framework for Graph-Based Parsing of German Private Law Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-010-9104-xopenalex-snapshot
Argumentation mining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9080-xopenalex-snapshot
Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802034openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Schemes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/dest.2013.6611332openalex-snapshot
Towards automated identification and analysis of argumentation structures in the decision corpus of the German Federal Constitutional Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218213004001922openalex-snapshot
ARAUCARIA: SOFTWARE FOR ARGUMENT ANALYSIS, DIAGRAMMING AND REPRESENTATION
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1276318.1276362openalex-snapshot
Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568246openalex-snapshot
Argumentation mining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800661312openalex-snapshot
Juristische Methodenlehre
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625openalex-snapshot
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838552118openalex-snapshot
Kleine Schule des juristischen Denkens
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838560571openalex-snapshot
Kleine Schule des juristischen Denkens
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5555/2017212.2017217openalex-snapshot
Design science in information systems research

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2972803openalex-extracted
Tool-Support for Design Science Research: Design Principles and Instantiation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07224-7_5openalex-snapshot
Die Anwendung von Text Mining in den Sozialwissenschaften
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-019-00544-3openalex-snapshot
Digitale Transformation von Prozessen in der Rechtsberatung: Anwendungsszenarien im Steuerbereich am Beispiel des ARGUMENTUM-Systems
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.