On the public citation graph

Direct megavoltage photon calibration service in Australia

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-014-0293-6
0 signed · 30 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7486-2_4openalex-snapshot
A Monte-Carlo study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-010-0031-7openalex-snapshot
The 2009 survey of therapy equipment and dosimetry practices in Australian radiotherapy centres*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(88)90046-1openalex-snapshot
Effects of dosimetric and clinical uncertainty on complication-free local tumor control
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04147-0openalex-snapshot
Meta-analysis of dose-fractionation radiotherapy trials for the palliation of painful bone metastases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/50/1a/06015openalex-snapshot
Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K6 of the standards for absorbed dose to water of the LNE–LNHB, France and the BIPM in accelerator photon beams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/35/10/301openalex-snapshot
Code of Practice for high-energy photon therapy dosimetry based on the NPL absorbed dose calibration service
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/17/301openalex-snapshot
Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international Codes of Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/3/305openalex-snapshot
Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/18/301openalex-snapshot
The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/22/7599openalex-snapshot
Spectral differences in 6 MV beams with matched PDDs and the effect on chamber response
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/19/6593openalex-snapshot
Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when60Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012001openalex-snapshot
QA in Radiation Therapy: The RPC Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012006openalex-snapshot
Accuracy required and achievable in radiotherapy dosimetry: have modern technology and techniques changed our views?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs276openalex-snapshot
Direct MC conversion of absorbed dose to graphite to absorbed dose to water for 6060Co radiation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu272openalex-snapshot
Comparison of the NMIJ and the ARPANSA standards for absorbed dose to water in high-energy photon beams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2905028openalex-snapshot
Relationship between and stopping‐power ratios for flattening filter free accelerators: A Monte Carlo study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3375895openalex-snapshot
Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose factors in megavoltage photon beams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3495537openalex-snapshot
Monte Carlo calculations of , the beam quality conversion factor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4866223openalex-snapshot
Addendum to the AAPMˈs TG‐51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high‐energy photon beams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1118/1.594356openalex-snapshot
Determination of Absorbed Dose in a Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma Rays in Radiotherapy Procedures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598691openalex-snapshot
AAPM's TG‐51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high‐energy photon and electron beams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i1.2676openalex-snapshot
Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.25030/ncs-018openalex-snapshot
NCS Report 18: Code of practice for the absorbed dose determination in high energy photon and electron beams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.078a.037openalex-snapshot
A heat-loss-compensated calorimeter: theory, design, and performance

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4138330openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12185openalex-snapshot
Commissioning of a PTW 34070 large‐area plane‐parallel ionization chamber for small field megavoltage photon dosimetry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-022-00619-3openalex-snapshot
Absorbed dose to water standard of high-energy x-rays at the KRISS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.10.002openalex-snapshot
Characterisation of a synthetic diamond detector for end-to-end dosimetry in stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiosurgery
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110699openalex-snapshot
Feasibility of Implementing a Megavoltage Ionization Chamber Calibration Service at the Secondary Standards Level
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1118/1.4922710openalex-snapshot
Calibration of radiotherapy ionization chambers using Co‐60 is outdated and should be replaced by direct calibration in linear accelerator beams
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.