On the public citation graph
What factors influence the reviewer assignment to pull requests?
0 signed · 52 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-015-1577-3openalex-snapshot
CoreDevRec: Automatic Core Member Recommendation for Contribution Evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5openalex-snapshot
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.004openalex-snapshot
Reviewer recommendation for pull-requests in GitHub: What can we learn from code review and bug assignment?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0898-1221(96)90007-3openalex-snapshot
Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla.2015.41openalex-snapshot
Rejection Factors of Pull Requests Filed by Core Team Developers in Software Projects with High Acceptance Rates
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme.2014.107openalex-snapshot
Reviewer Recommender of Pull-Requests in GitHub
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/msr.2012.6224294openalex-snapshot
GHTorrent: Github's data from a firehose
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/msr20668.2012openalex-snapshot
2012 9th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1150402openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1656274.1656278openalex-snapshot
The WEKA data mining software
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675215openalex-snapshot
Social Barriers Faced by Newcomers Placing Their First Contribution in Open Source Software Projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2695664openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2695664.2695856openalex-snapshot
Acceptance factors of pull requests in open-source projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2695664.2695884openalex-snapshot
Developers assignment for analyzing pull requests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2889160openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2897659openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on CrowdSourcing in Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-3305openalex-snapshot
Data mining: concepts and techniques
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2946openalex-snapshot
What factors influence the lifetime of pull requests?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05559-3openalex-snapshot
Recommending pull request reviewers based on code changes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-024-00416-1openalex-snapshot
ReBack: recommending backports in social coding environments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10327-6openalex-snapshot
The impact of a continuous integration service on the delivery time of merged pull requests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106483openalex-snapshot
Identifying expertise through semantic modeling: A modified BBPSO algorithm for the reviewer assignment problem
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111009openalex-snapshot
Can we benchmark Code Review studies? A systematic mapping study of methodology, dataset, and metric
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100070openalex-snapshot
Modeling social coding dynamics with sampled historical data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2925560openalex-snapshot
Learning to Rank Reviewers for Pull Requests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/apsec48747.2019.00072openalex-snapshot
Investigating Cross-Repository Socially Connected Teams on GitHub
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00124openalex-snapshot
A Large-Scale Empirical Study of COVID-19 Themed GitHub Repositories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/csci46756.2018.00241openalex-snapshot
A Cross-Repository Model for Predicting Popularity in GitHub
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/csci46756.2018.00247openalex-snapshot
Network Semantic Segmentation with Application to GitHub
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icccnt45670.2019.8944878openalex-snapshot
Trend Prediction of GitHub using Time Series Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2021.3093159openalex-snapshot
How Developers Modify Pull Requests in Code Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2019.2917191openalex-snapshot
Recommending Participants for Collaborative Merge Sessions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3301326.3301380openalex-snapshot
Finding Impact Factors for Rejection of Pull Requests on GitHub
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3319008.3319354openalex-snapshot
Modern code reviews - Preliminary results of a systematic mapping study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3585004openalex-snapshot
Modern Code Reviews—Survey of Literature and Practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3793302.3793573openalex-snapshot
On Autopilot? An Empirical Study of Human–AI Teaming and Review Practices in Open Source
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3797880openalex-snapshot
Why Are My Pull Request Descriptions Constantly Revised? Understanding Modifying Descriptions and Reviewer Suggestions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18293/seke2023-084openalex-snapshot
GAT-Team: A Team Recommendation Model for Open-Source Software Projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/app11030920openalex-snapshot
New Developer Metrics for Open Source Software Development Challenges: An Empirical Study of Project Recommendation Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/s23052551openalex-snapshot
Automatic Code Review by Learning the Structure Information of Code Graph
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3702-5.ch102openalex-snapshot
Open Source Software Development Challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9158-1.ch003openalex-snapshot
Open Source Software Development Challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2003.10750openalex-snapshot
Open Source Software Development Challenges: A Systematic Literature Review on GitHub
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2010.12218openalex-snapshot
When the Open Source Community Meets COVID-19: Characterizing COVID-19 themed GitHub Repositories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5753/semish.2025.6870openalex-snapshot
Avaliando a Importância do Arquivo contributing.md em Projetos de Código Aberto
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5753/vem.2022.226789openalex-snapshot
Exploring Pull Requests in Code Samples
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.