On the public citation graph
Why is my code change abandoned?
0 signed · 75 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-015-9366-8openalex-snapshot
Investigating technical and non-technical factors influencing modern code review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-015-9381-9openalex-snapshot
An empirical study of the impact of modern code review practices on software quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9452-6openalex-snapshot
Review participation in modern code review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-018-9602-0openalex-snapshot
Early prediction of merged code changes to prioritize reviewing tasks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-018-9646-1openalex-snapshot
The impact of human factors on the participation decision of reviewers in modern code review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-411519-4.00009-4openalex-snapshot
A Mixed Methods Approach to Mining Code Review Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619openalex-snapshot
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/52.28121openalex-snapshot
Software inspections: an effective verification process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/ase.2017.8115626openalex-snapshot
Automatically generating commit messages from diffs using neural machine translation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/compsac.2017.153openalex-snapshot
Interactively Decomposing Composite Changes to Support Code Review and Regression Testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icpc.2017.12openalex-snapshot
Towards Automatic Generation of Short Summaries of Commits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icse30413.2015openalex-snapshot
2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsm.2015.7332454openalex-snapshot
Four eyes are better than two: On the impact of code reviews on software quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsm.2015.7332457openalex-snapshot
Investigating code review quality: Do people and participation matter?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme.2014.49openalex-snapshot
Writing Acceptable Patches: An Empirical Study of Open Source Project Patches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme.2017.40openalex-snapshot
Confusion Detection in Code Reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2003.1207450openalex-snapshot
Practical code inspection techniques for object-oriented systems: An experimental comparison
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2008.7openalex-snapshot
Inspecting the History of Inspections: An Example of Evidence-Based Technology Diffusion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2017.3571566openalex-snapshot
International Conference on Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/msr.2013.6624002openalex-snapshot
Gerrit software code review data from Android
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/msr.2013.6624016openalex-snapshot
Will my patch make it? And how fast? Case study on the Linux kernel
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2015.7081824openalex-snapshot
Who should review my code? A file location-based code-reviewer recommendation approach for Modern Code Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/scam.2014.14openalex-snapshot
On Automatically Generating Commit Messages via Summarization of Source Code Changes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/scam34268.2014openalex-snapshot
2014 IEEE 14th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/swste.2007.18openalex-snapshot
Estimating the Required Code Inspection Team Size
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/wcre.2012.54openalex-snapshot
The Secret Life of Patches: A Firefox Case Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/wcre.2013.6671287openalex-snapshot
The influence of non-technical factors on code review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1368088.1368162openalex-snapshot
Open source software peer review practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1370750openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/167049.167070openalex-snapshot
Does every inspection need a meeting?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1852786openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1852786.1852850openalex-snapshot
Impact of maintainability defects on code inspections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1985793openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1985793.1985867openalex-snapshot
Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2491411openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2491411.2491444openalex-snapshot
Convergent contemporary software peer review practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/253228.253248openalex-snapshot
An empirical study of communication in code inspections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597076openalex-snapshot
The impact of code review coverage and code review participation on software quality: a case study of the qt, VTK, and ITK projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2889160.2889243openalex-snapshot
A study of the quality-impacting practices of modern code review at Sony mobile
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2897586openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238190openalex-snapshot
Neural-machine-translation-based commit message generation: how far are we?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3387904openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Program Comprehension
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.153.0182openalex-snapshot
Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s40411-015-0024-zopenalex-snapshot
Patch rejection in Firefox: negative reviews, backouts, and issue reopening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ease2009.11openalex-snapshot
Harmfulness of Code Duplication - A Structured Review of the Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.14279/tuj.eceasst.0.908openalex-snapshot
Analyzing Gerrit Code Review Parameters with Bicho
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968openalex-snapshot
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5555/2486788.2486882openalex-snapshot
Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5555/2486788.2486915openalex-snapshot
Reducing human effort and improving quality in peer code reviews using automatic static analysis and reviewer recommendation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5555/2818754.2818773openalex-snapshot
Helping developers help themselves: automatic decomposition of code review changesets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5555/2820518.2820538openalex-snapshot
Characteristics of useful code reviews: an empirical study at Microsoft
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10484-2openalex-snapshot
Demystifying code snippets in code reviews: a study of the OpenStack and Qt communities and a practitioner survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10488-yopenalex-snapshot
An empirical study on cross-component dependent changes: A case study on the components of OpenStack
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-025-10654-wopenalex-snapshot
Towards understanding code review practices for infrastructure-as-code: An empirical study on OpenStack projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-025-09720-9openalex-snapshot
Supporting the identification of prevalent quality issues in code changes by analyzing reviewers’ feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106756openalex-snapshot
Early prediction for merged vs abandoned code changes in modern code reviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.110951openalex-snapshot
A systematic literature review and taxonomy of modern code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111009openalex-snapshot
Can we benchmark Code Review studies? A systematic mapping study of methodology, dataset, and metric
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112179openalex-snapshot
An empirical study on bug severity estimation using source code metrics and static analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/esem64174.2025.00071openalex-snapshot
What About Our Bug? A Study on the Responsiveness of NPM Package Maintainers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/sces61914.2024.10652412openalex-snapshot
Performance Evaluation of Support Vector Classifier Kernel Functions in Method-Level Refactoring Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2024.3443741openalex-snapshot
Predicting the First Response Latency of Maintainers and Contributors in Pull Requests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3524842.3527975openalex-snapshot
An empirical study on maintainable method size in Java
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3624739openalex-snapshot
Understanding the Helpfulness of Stale Bot for Pull-Based Development: An Empirical Study of 20 Large Open-Source Projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3680472openalex-snapshot
MULTICR: Predicting Merged and Abandoned Code Changes in Modern Code Review Using Multi-Objective Search
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3715006openalex-snapshot
The Good, the Bad, and the Monstrous: Predicting Highly Change-Prone Source Code Methods at Their Inception
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3800963openalex-snapshot
A Roadmap for Modern Code Review: Challenges and Opportunities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.613b5419842293c031b5b639openalex-snapshot
A systematic literature review and taxonomy of modern code review
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.