On the public citation graph
Impact and structural features of meta-analytical studies, standard articles and reviews in psychology: Similarities and differences
0 signed · 49 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1301openalex-snapshot
The Journal Impact Factor Denominator
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199401)45:1<39::aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-qopenalex-snapshot
On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470723852.ch7openalex-snapshot
Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20531openalex-snapshot
Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7openalex-snapshot
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016604openalex-snapshot
Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02017057openalex-snapshot
Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the science citation index database
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1892-8openalex-snapshot
What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0025-yopenalex-snapshot
Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: a gender perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0469-8openalex-snapshot
The journal relative impact: an indicator for journal assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0738-1openalex-snapshot
Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the Social Sciences?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0761-2openalex-snapshot
Meta-analysis in psychology: a bibliometric study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.002openalex-snapshot
Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.011openalex-snapshot
Articles vs. proceedings papers: Do they differ in research relevance and impact? A case study in the Library and Information Science field
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005628218890openalex-snapshot
An Analysis of Document Types Published in Journals Related to Physics: Proceeding Papers Recorded in the Science Citation Index Database
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014848323806openalex-snapshot
Journal impact measures in bibliometric research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000034382.85360.cdopenalex-snapshot
Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752openalex-snapshot
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195326543.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/5.2.113openalex-snapshot
A bibliometric study of highly cited European physics papers in the 80s
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497openalex-snapshot
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301_7openalex-snapshot
For Your Citations Only? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3152/147154403781776645openalex-snapshot
Characteristics of highly cited papers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00084openalex-snapshot
Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878644openalex-snapshot
Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4664071openalex-extracted
Framing Predictors of Salespeople's Performance in B2b Sales – a Toolkit and Guide for Scholars and Practitioners
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23864openalex-snapshot
Macro‐level diffusion of a methodological knowledge innovation: Research synthesis methods, 1972–2011
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301076openalex-snapshot
Changing approaches to research synthesis affect social and intellectual structures of science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2332-zopenalex-snapshot
Publish or perish: how Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2483-yopenalex-snapshot
Document type assignment accuracy in the journal citation index data of Web of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2503-yopenalex-snapshot
How to identify metaknowledge trends and features in a certain research field? Evidences from innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04199-0openalex-snapshot
A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04610-4openalex-snapshot
Defining the unscholarly publication: a bibliometric study of uncited and barely cited publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.003openalex-snapshot
The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.002openalex-snapshot
Assessing the industrial opportunity of academic research with patent relatedness: A case study on polymer electrolyte fuel cells
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/bij-10-2021-0598openalex-snapshot
Benchmarking meta-analytical conceptualizations of B2B seller skills against empirical evidence in services firms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-03-2023-0089openalex-snapshot
Salespeople’s sales performance skills in B2B of services firms – a cross-industrial study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-08-2024-0239openalex-snapshot
Framing predictors of salespeople’s performance in B2B sales: a toolkit and guide for scholars and practitioners
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/mip-03-2021-0100openalex-snapshot
Organisational and environmental indicators of B2B sales performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2015.7273151openalex-snapshot
‘State-of-the-art’ of ‘state-of-the-art’: Extracting science-social issues interface
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12038openalex-snapshot
Editorial: The Future of Writing and Reviewing for IJMR
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3677389.3702510openalex-snapshot
From Static to Dynamic: Survey-based Academic Impact Measurement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0960327116678299openalex-snapshot
Global research production in glyphosate intoxication from 1978 to 2015: A bibliometric analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/09610006251387739openalex-snapshot
What types of LIS research are preferred in evidence-informed public policy development? Investigating differences in policy citations of Review Articles and Original Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2022.67.1.17openalex-snapshot
Mapping the Borderline Personality Disorder: A Bibliometric Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17615/j9w4-6429openalex-snapshot
Diffusion of Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, and Related Research Synthesis Methods: Patterns, Contexts, and Impact
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.