On the public citation graph

The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615696
0 signed · 1204 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1008989openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1012694openalex-extracted
Race and the Politics of Criminal Cases on State Supreme Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1120522openalex-extracted
Deciding to Agree: Explaining Consensual Behavior on the United States Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1120773openalex-extracted
The Politics of Judicial Departures in the U.S. Federal Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1120957openalex-extracted
The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the United States Courts of Appeals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1120970openalex-extracted
What Makes a Judgment 'Liberal'? Coding Bias in the United States Supreme Court Judicial Database
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1121196openalex-extracted
Bargaining Power on the Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1121547openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1183677openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1307789openalex-extracted
Constructing Courts in Polarized Times
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1393362openalex-extracted
On the Study of Judicial Behaviors: Of Law, Politics, Science and Humility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1404600openalex-extracted
The Rule of Law is Dead! Long Live the Rule of Law!
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1407518openalex-extracted
Jekyll and Hyde Questions from the Bench: Does the Emotional Nature of Supreme Court Justices' Questions Affect their Votes on the Merits?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1429330openalex-extracted
Judicial Setbacks, Material Gains: Terror Litigation at the Israeli HCJ
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1433742openalex-extracted
Extreme Dissensus: Explaining Plurality Decisions on the United States Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1434685openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443264openalex-extracted
Cognition, Motivation, and Supreme Court Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443332openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443381openalex-extracted
The Consequences of Immigration Reform for the US Courts of Appeals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443411openalex-extracted
Operationalizing Plain Meaning in Supreme Court Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1475660openalex-extracted
Ideology, Partisanship, and Judicial Review of Acts of Congress, 1789-2006
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1491128openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1503572openalex-extracted
The Multi-Staged Process of Judicial Review: Facial and As-Applied Constitutional Challenges to Legislation Before the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1536723openalex-extracted
What Do Federal District Judges Want? An Analysis of Publications, Citations, and Reversals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1544616openalex-extracted
Economic Performance and Political Coordination in Portugal’s ‘Dry’ Political System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1572701openalex-extracted
Specialization in Judicial Decision Making: Comparing Bankruptcy Panels and Federal District Court Judges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1601489openalex-extracted
Can 'So Few So Quickly Change So Much?'
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1610274openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1641471openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1656612openalex-extracted
‘U.S. Asylum Decisions: Who You Face on the Bench is as Important as What You Face at Home’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1695775openalex-extracted
Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of Supreme Court Opinions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1832765openalex-extracted
Left, Right, and Center: Strategic Information Acquisition and Diversity in Judicial Panels
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1846631openalex-extracted
Acclimation Effects and the Chief Justice: The Influence of Tenure on the Decisional Behavior of the Court’s Leader, 1888-2007
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1846663openalex-extracted
Chief Justice Roberts and Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court: A Cross-Time Comparison of Four Chief Justice Courts, 1953-2008
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1852678openalex-extracted
Ideological Congruity between Appointing Presidents and Supreme Court Justices, 1937-2008
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1877083openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1882245openalex-extracted
Economic Recovery Rules and Attorney Representation in Job Discrimination Litigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1931714openalex-extracted
The Policy Consequences of Allowing Retired Justices to Serve on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2064861openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2065494openalex-extracted
Does the Attitudinal Model of Supreme Court Decision Making Depend on Litigation Choices? Applying the Priest-Klein Selection Hypothesis to Litigation in the High Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2097259openalex-extracted
Judicial Review and Political Bias: Moving from Consensual to Majoritarian Democracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2101273openalex-extracted
Bad Law Before it Goes Bad: Citation Networks and the Life Cycle of Overruled Supreme Court Precedent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2101718openalex-extracted
'Networked Justice: Judges, the Diffusion of Ideas, and Legal Reform Movements in Mexico'
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2239441openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2241686openalex-extracted
Opposite Side of the Same Agenda Setting Coin? DIGs in the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2242942openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2305426openalex-extracted
The Chilean Constitutional Court and the 2005 Reform: A Castling between Career Judges and Academics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2308954openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2314135openalex-extracted
Measuring Judicial Minimalism on the Roberts Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2341109openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2365030openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2393591openalex-extracted
Do Brazilian courts contribute to the implementation of the right to housing?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2421773openalex-extracted
The Impact of Supreme Court Signals and Circuit Effects on Responses to Precedent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2451155openalex-extracted
Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for U.S. Supreme Court Adjudication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2463244openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2468028openalex-extracted
Decision-Making Process in Brazil's Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2470278openalex-extracted
After the Override: An Empirical Analysis of Shadow Precedent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2470682openalex-extracted
The Brazilian Supreme Court and Subnational Legislative Decision-Making Process: An Exploratory Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2509465openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2533901openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2568129openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2576916openalex-extracted
'If We are Wrong...The Courts Will Correct It': Position-Taking, Judicial Review, and Legislative Voting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2584048openalex-extracted
After the Override: An Empirical Analysis of Shadow Precedent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2591240openalex-extracted
Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Case of Taiwan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2593628openalex-extracted
Innocuous Time-Saver or Counter-Majoritarian Loophole? The Cert Pool and Policy on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2623262openalex-extracted
Notes on Countermovements and Conservative Lawyering: The Bumpy Road to Constitutional Marriage Equality in Brazil
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2623366openalex-extracted
The Causes of Rising Opinion Dissensus on Taiwan's Constitutional Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2663778openalex-extracted
Judicialization Without Tenure: Principal and Regime Complexes in Investment Arbitration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2702144openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2703875openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2717412openalex-extracted
Measuring Policy Preferences of Judges at the German Federal Court of Justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2737720openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739927openalex-extracted
Understanding Legislative-Judicial Relations Under Incomplete Information: Absorption and Vetoes at the German Constitutional Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2740090openalex-extracted
Judging Under Political Constraint: The Ecuadorean Case (2008-2015)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2740594openalex-extracted
Does the Law Matter and How Would We Know?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2808200openalex-extracted
Measuring Judicial Ideology Using Law Clerk Hiring
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2846014openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2922411openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2928196openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2953087openalex-extracted
The Legal Academy's Ideological Uniformity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2971472openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993200openalex-extracted
Deferring, Deliberating, or Dodging Review? Examining the Mechanisms Behind Panel Effects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048182openalex-extracted
Does Efficiency Trump Legality? The Case of the German Constitutional Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3090789openalex-extracted
Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Voting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3100214openalex-extracted
A Study on Judicial Ideal Points in a Bidimensional Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3110752openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3131773openalex-extracted
Judges Without Attributes? The Political Economy of Detention of Deportable Non-Citizens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3245045openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3250082openalex-extracted
Politics From the Bench?: Ideology and Strategic Voting in the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3261668openalex-extracted
The Supreme Court’s (Surprising?) Indifference to Public Opinion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3332943openalex-extracted
Judicial Ideology in Economic Cases: Evidence from the General Court of the European Union
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3397299openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3458295openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3537876openalex-extracted
The 'Odd Party Out' Theory of Certiorari
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3540984openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3988401openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3991658openalex-extracted
Career, Gender and Political Bias in Pretrial Decisions on Gender Violence: Evidence from a natural experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4028774openalex-extracted
Just Friends? Managers’ Connections to Judges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4113472openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4124690openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4178673openalex-extracted
The Constraint of History
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4181908openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4235582openalex-extracted
Litigation Risk and IPO Underpricing: Evidence from Federal Judge Ideology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4503469openalex-extracted
Litigation Risk and IPO Underpricing: Evidence from Federal Judge Ideology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4533231openalex-extracted
The Pervasive Influence of Ideology at the Federal Circuit Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4687112openalex-extracted
Decision Making on the World Court: Does Geopolitics Matter?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4990476openalex-extracted
Politically biased moderation drives echo chamber formation: An analysis of user-driven content removals on Reddit
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.503446openalex-extracted
Richard Posner's Democratic Pragmatism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5124478openalex-extracted
Ideological Polarization on Constitutional Courts: Evidence from Spain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.617821openalex-extracted
The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.789544openalex-extracted
Judicial Entrepreneurs on the U.S. Courts of Appeals: A Citation Analysis of Judicial Influence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.878353openalex-extracted
Ideology and Deference in U.S. Courts of Appeals Decision Making on Administrative Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.895721openalex-extracted
Courts, Congress and Public Policy, Part I: The Fda, the Courts and the Regulation of Tobacco
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.913663openalex-extracted
Bias in Judicial Citations: A New Window into the Behavior of Judges?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.922183openalex-extracted
The Attitudinal Model, Political Science, Ecological Fallacy and Exaggeration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.925705openalex-extracted
Law Clerk Influence on Supreme Court Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.937335openalex-extracted
Judges, Litigants and the Design of Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.948813openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.951873openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.960190openalex-extracted
The Structure of Legal Rules and the Analysis of Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.969033openalex-extracted
Politics and the Rule of Law in Transnational Judicial Governance: The Case of Forum Non Conveniens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.987862openalex-extracted
An Empirical Analysis of Hierarchy Effects in Judicial Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.988199openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.997113openalex-extracted
Foreign Policy Litigation and Civil Liberties in the Post-September 11th Environment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.998164openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.998180openalex-extracted
'Such Inferior Courts...': Compliance by Circuits with Jurisprudential Regimes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118528631.ch35openalex-snapshot
Religious Influences on Catholic and Jewish Supreme Court Justices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0336openalex-snapshot
The Evolving View of the Law and Judicial Decision‐Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3658openalex-snapshot
Economic nationalism and the home court advantage
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06449-3_7openalex-snapshot
Crisis and the Pursuit of Conservatism: Liberty, Security, and the Bush Justice Department
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-41262-1_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction: OH What a Tangled Web They Weave
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01545-9_8openalex-snapshot
The Legacy of President Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_14-1openalex-snapshot
Legal Influence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21629-0openalex-snapshot
Taking the EU to Court : Annulment Proceedings and Multilevel Judicial Conflict
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21629-0_2openalex-snapshot
Towards an Analytical Framework to Study Annulments in the EU
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21629-0_7openalex-snapshot
Litigant Success: How Litigant Configurations Relate to Legal Outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44556-0_14openalex-snapshot
Legal Influence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7_1openalex-snapshot
The Two Faces of Judicial Power
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7_2openalex-snapshot
The Judicial-Policy-Dialogue Game
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7_4openalex-snapshot
The First Face of Judicial Power
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_1108openalex-snapshot
Law as a Source of Democratic Principles and Public Administration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91495-0_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction and State of the Art
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91495-0_6openalex-snapshot
Federalism and Party Polarisation in the US
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91495-0_8openalex-snapshot
Executive Dominance with Decentralisation in France
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96095-7_1openalex-snapshot
Evaluative Language in Legal Professional Practice: The Case of Justification of Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11744-2_7openalex-snapshot
An Analytic Framework for Research on Judicial Decision-Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30844-4_9openalex-snapshot
Common Law Systems and COVID-19 Policy Response: Protective Public Health Policy in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64751-2_3openalex-snapshot
Democracy, Federalism, and the Rule of Law: Theoretical Perspectives on Constitutional Adjudication in the German States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64751-2_7openalex-snapshot
Constitutional Courts and Politics in the German States: Does Judicialization Exist and If So Why?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93401-8_24openalex-snapshot
Deliberation and Voting Process Before the French Constitutional Court: Is the Attitudinal Model Relevant?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04515-7_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction: The Judicial Use of Soft Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04515-7_2openalex-snapshot
The Analytical Framework: Understanding Soft Law and National Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-26950-8_1openalex-snapshot
An Introduction: A Roadmap for Understanding the Law, Politics, and Behavior of Judges in Redistricting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-26950-8_3openalex-snapshot
Social Science Theories for Judicial Behavior in Redistricting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-26950-8_5openalex-snapshot
Partisanship Constrained in the Federal District Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8_7openalex-snapshot
Anti-Theoretical Claims About Legal Interpretation: The Argument Behind the Fallacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18549-1_8openalex-snapshot
Theories of Judicial Behavior and the Law: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_1108openalex-snapshot
Law as a Source of Democratic Principles and Public Administration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1108-1openalex-snapshot
Law as a Source of Democratic Principles and Public Administration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1108-2openalex-snapshot
Law as a Source of Democratic Principles and Public Administration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53381-0_1openalex-snapshot
An Empirical Puzzle
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53492-3_7openalex-snapshot
Anomalies of Normal Legal Science, Applications of User-Friendly Legal Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75859-6_5openalex-snapshot
The Cognitive and Social Psychological Bases of Bias in Forensic Mental Health Judgments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89432-4_2openalex-snapshot
The Concept of Political Confidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90465-8_7openalex-snapshot
Die Entscheidungen von Verfassungsgerichten — ein Spiegel ihrer Zusammensetzung?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91380-3_11openalex-snapshot
Ist das neunte amerikanische Berufungsgericht liberaler als die anderen Bundesberufungsgerichte?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93217-0_13openalex-snapshot
Verfassungsgerichte: neutrale Verfassungshüter oder Vetospieler?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94046-5_11openalex-snapshot
Impliziter Verfassungswandel durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht in gesellschaftlichen und politischen Fragen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54041-7_3openalex-snapshot
Committee Goal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02338-6_27openalex-snapshot
Verfassungsgerichte in der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02993-7_27-1openalex-snapshot
Verfassungsgerichte in der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05213-3_12openalex-snapshot
Von rügenden Richtern und richtenden Rügen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19662-2_6openalex-snapshot
Das Spannungsdreieck aus Fakten, Recht und Macht: Die Rechtsprechung des US-Supreme Court im konstruktivistischen Spannungsfeld zwischen neuen Technologien, altem Verfassungsrecht und machtpolitischer Folgeneinschätzung
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21990-1_11openalex-snapshot
(Verfassungs-)Richterliches Entscheiden
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28961-4_1openalex-snapshot
Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in Bundesländern und Justizialisierung – zur Einführung
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28961-4_7openalex-snapshot
Sondervoten in Landesverfassungsgerichten
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43579-0openalex-snapshot
The Fight against Systemic Corruption
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43579-0_5openalex-snapshot
Moro’s Opinions: A Quantitative Analysis of Sentencing in Operation Car Wash
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-519-3_4openalex-snapshot
A Socio-Legal Analysis of The Legitimacy of Highest Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_158openalex-snapshot
Naturalism in Jurisprudence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_67openalex-snapshot
Legal Realism, American: Theoretical Aspects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_158-1openalex-snapshot
Naturalism in Jurisprudence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_67-2openalex-snapshot
American Legal Realism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_67-3openalex-snapshot
American Legal Realism – Theoretical Aspects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7951-8_6openalex-snapshot
Group Formation and Precedent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3230-4_6openalex-snapshot
Behavioral Courts and Judicial Doctrines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9115-7_1openalex-snapshot
The Development of Principles of Contemporary Judging
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9115-7_2openalex-snapshot
Introduction to the Judicial Function
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4387-5_5openalex-snapshot
Case Study: U.S. Compliance with Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09244-1openalex-snapshot
Vertical precedents in formal models of precedential constraint
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-015-9200-8openalex-snapshot
An empirical analysis of constitutional review voting in the polish constitutional tribunal, 2003–2014
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-017-9250-1openalex-snapshot
Is the Spanish Constitutional Court an instrument of the central government against the Autonomous Communities?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-018-09271-1openalex-snapshot
Signals from a politicized bar: the solicitor general as a direct litigant before the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-019-09631-8openalex-snapshot
Consensus and dissent in the resolution of conflicts of competence by the Spanish Constitutional Court: the role of federalism and ideology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-023-09776-7openalex-snapshot
Punishing terrorists in the Spanish Supreme Court: has ideology played any role?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-015-1253-6openalex-snapshot
Statistical Mechanics of the US Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9102-zopenalex-snapshot
Do a law's policy implications affect beliefs about its constitutionality? An experimental test.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09544-xopenalex-snapshot
Judicial Institutions and the Political Economy of Retirements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09640-3openalex-snapshot
Norms and Political Payoffs in Supreme Court Recusals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09905-7openalex-snapshot
Millionaire Justices and Attitudes Towards the Supreme Court
showing the first 200 of 1204
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.