On the public citation graph

Multidimensional Analysis as a Window into Activism Scholarship: Searching for Meaning with Sniffer Dogs

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0829320100009923
0 signed · 40 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-8111(97)90029-1openalex-snapshot
Freedom's law: The moral reading of the American Constitution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500039115openalex-snapshot
The Politics of Disagreement: Recent Work in Constitutional Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500041206openalex-snapshot
Judicial Review and Criminal Disenfranchisement in the United States and Canada
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0829320100006554openalex-snapshot
Confronting Judicial Supremacy: A Defence of Judicial Activism and the Supreme Court of Cananda's Legal Rights Jurisprudence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0841820900003994openalex-snapshot
Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0841820900004033openalex-snapshot
Judicial Activism: A Multidimensional Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0841820900006639openalex-snapshot
The Idea of a Living Constitution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.1.177openalex-snapshot
Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/11.4.453openalex-snapshot
Constitutional Rights and Common Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822973openalex-snapshot
Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.330266openalex-snapshot
Conservatives and the Seven Sins of Judicial Activism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1963001openalex-snapshot
Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Edited By Stephen C. Halpern and Charles M. Lamb. (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1982. Pp. xi + 436. $32.95.)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3323616openalex-snapshot
Supreme Court Activism and Restraint
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3479972openalex-snapshot
Taking Rights Seriously
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3552221openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1smjvb5openalex-snapshot
Constitutional Self-Government
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.25071/2g13y778openalex-snapshot
The charter's impact on the criminal justice system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1279openalex-snapshot
R. v. Mann: Further Down the Slippery Slope
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1328openalex-snapshot
A Failed Experiment - Investigative Detention: Ten Years Later
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442674127openalex-snapshot
Due Process and Victims' Rights: The New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442684898openalex-snapshot
Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence: A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674034464openalex-snapshot
Constitutional Self-Government
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315096339-8openalex-snapshot
The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures©
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract19774312openalex-snapshot
Taking Rights Seriously
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-1198openalex-snapshot
Freedom's law: the moral reading of the American Constitution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-5364openalex-snapshot
The federal courts: challenge and reform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-1220openalex-snapshot
Taking the Constitution away from the courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-3553openalex-snapshot
The Charter revolution and the Court party
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-5868openalex-snapshot
A common law theory of judicial review: the living tree
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1254openalex-snapshot
Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or "Much Ado About Metaphors"
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1520openalex-snapshot
Six Degrees of Dialogue: A Response to Hogg and Bushell
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1521openalex-snapshot
Reply to "Six Degrees of Dialogue"
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1524openalex-snapshot
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Rebalancing of Liberal Constitutionalism in Canada, 1982-1997
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1612openalex-snapshot
The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such a Bad Thing after All)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1729openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court's First One Hundred Charter of Rights Decisions: A Statistical Analysis

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2995844openalex-extracted
Measuring Activism and Restraint or How to Conflate Doctrine with Activism: A Response to Professor Riddell's Small-Scale Judicial Output Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43243-4_4openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court of Canada Presents: The Surveillant Charter and the Judicial Creation of Police Powers in Canada
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-014-9515-9openalex-snapshot
Situating Exclusion of Evidence Analysis in its Socio-Legal Place: A Tale of Judicial Populism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azae048openalex-snapshot
Sensing Toxic Injustice: Exploring the Polluting Touch of Colonialism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2914.e08openalex-snapshot
Canadian Exclusion of Evidence Under Section 24(2) of the Charter: An Empirical Model of Judicial Discourse
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.