On the public citation graph

Likeable? Effective Commander in Chief? Polling on Candidate Traits in the “Year of the Presidential Woman”

https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096508080980
0 signed · 41 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00990172openalex-snapshot
Presidential prototypes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-3794(97)83147-2openalex-snapshot
The voter's guide to election polls
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807299.002openalex-snapshot
Presidential Elections: Gendered Space and the Case of 2008
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115406.001.0001openalex-snapshot
When Women Lead
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600304openalex-snapshot
The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685855185openalex-snapshot
Anticipating Madam President
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2944795openalex-snapshot
Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-5343openalex-snapshot
When women lead: integrative leadership in state legislatures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1232openalex-snapshot
Women transforming Congress
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-4308openalex-snapshot
Anticipating madam president
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-2385openalex-snapshot
Gender and elections: shaping the future of American politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-7140openalex-snapshot
Gender and elections: shaping the future of American politics

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4885506openalex-extracted
Women's Political Participation in Africa: A Systematic Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-026-10151-wopenalex-snapshot
Disability Benefits? The Impact of Physical Disability in Electoral Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01070-8openalex-snapshot
Leadership as a Reflection of Who We Are: Social Identity, Media Portrayal, and Evaluations of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x14000221openalex-snapshot
Gender Stereotypes and Corruption: How Candidates Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x16000246openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Voting for Women Candidates by Level and Type of Office
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x16000672openalex-snapshot
Do Women Vote for Women Candidates? Attitudes toward Descriptive Representation and Voting Behavior in the 2010 British Election
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x20000665openalex-snapshot
Wearing the Pants(suit)? Gendered Leadership Styles, Partisanship, and Candidate Evaluation in the 2016 U.S. Election
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2017.1356251openalex-snapshot
Descriptive Gender Representation and Legitimacy in U.S. Trial Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1782636openalex-snapshot
What’s in a name? An experimental test of marital name change on perceptions of female political candidates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2026.2615072openalex-snapshot
(Post) materialist value orientations and global attitudes towards women in politics: a multi-wave cross-sectional analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15358590903248744openalex-snapshot
"The Joshua Generation": Rethinking the Rhetorical Presidency and Presidential Rhetoric
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2016.1268876openalex-snapshot
Do Candidates Run as Women and Men or Democrats and Republicans? The Impact of Party and Sex on Issue Campaigns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2019.1570757openalex-snapshot
Gender, Ambition, and Legislative Behavior in the United States House
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2022.1984143openalex-snapshot
Appointees versus Elected Officials: The Implications of Institutional Design on Gender Representation in Political Leadership
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629968openalex-snapshot
Many are called but few are chosen: the emergence of Latino congressional candidates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0307openalex-snapshot
Voter Support for Women Candidates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxac007openalex-snapshot
Gendered Perceptions of Personality Traits, Policy Stereotypes, and Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties: Lessons from Turkey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/s0895-9935(2012)0000020006openalex-snapshot
Internet Autobiographies: Female Politicians' Representations of Gender
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icaiic48513.2020.9065248openalex-snapshot
Who Wins the Game of Thrones? How Sentiments Improve the Prediction of Candidate Choice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12396openalex-snapshot
Confident and cautious candidates: Explaining under‐representation of women in Danish municipal politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12281openalex-snapshot
Restoring trust in the police: Why female officers reduce suspicions of corruption
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12556openalex-snapshot
Gender Essentialism and Responses to Candidates’ Messages
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716682074openalex-snapshot
‘Are you tough enough?’ Performing gender in the UK leadership debates 2015
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913487949openalex-snapshot
Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x13503034openalex-snapshot
It Takes a Survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1332/25151088y2025d000000097openalex-snapshot
Competent and influential: how do voters evaluate women prime ministers?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2021-0014openalex-snapshot
Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes: How Did Gender-Based Perceptions Put Hillary Clinton at an Electoral Disadvantage in the 2016 Election?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/soc16100322openalex-snapshot
Fit to Lead: Domain-Specific Attitudinal Barriers to Institutional Authority for People with Physical Disabilities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3088openalex-snapshot
Opinión de la población guipuzcoana sobre la figura de las mujeres políticas
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.