On the public citation graph
Geographical Coverage in Political Science Research
0 signed · 86 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-016-9218-6openalex-snapshot
Is Liberal Democracy Feasible in Developing Countries?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9268-zopenalex-snapshot
Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe, 1900–2017
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(85)90028-9openalex-snapshot
The field of electoral systems research: A critical survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096507071181openalex-snapshot
Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s104909651700110xopenalex-snapshot
Trends in Political Science Research and the Progress of Comparative Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977538openalex-snapshot
Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000297080openalex-snapshot
From Catch-all Politics to Cartelisation: The Political Economy of the Cartel Party
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1504778openalex-snapshot
Democratization Articles Dataset: an introduction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.722openalex-snapshot
Reconceptualizing Field Research in Political Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcq014openalex-snapshot
The absence of non-western IR theory in Asia reconsidered
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcq023openalex-snapshot
Non-Western International Relations Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz021openalex-snapshot
Things You Can See From There You Can't See From Here: Blind Spots in the American Perspective in IR and Their Effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz023openalex-snapshot
US Dominance in International Relations and Security Scholarship in Leading Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz031openalex-snapshot
American Perspectives and Blind Spots on World Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051017-113314openalex-snapshot
The Return of the Single-Country Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.040908.120058openalex-snapshot
What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951090openalex-snapshot
Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294815openalex-snapshot
Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710265openalex-snapshot
The Autocratic Welfare State: Old-Age Pensions, Credible Commitments, and Regime Survival
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512101223005openalex-snapshot
Africa and International Relations: Regional Lessons for a Global Discourse
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804039118openalex-snapshot
Parties as Franchise Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813509524openalex-snapshot
How democracy functions without parties
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2004.0005openalex-snapshot
African Lessons for International Relations Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214153openalex-snapshot
Development, Democracy, and Welfare States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1214openalex-snapshot
Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2009374openalex-snapshot
International Relations and Asian Studies: The Subordinate State System of Southern Asia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2009729openalex-snapshot
Toward Explaining Military Intervention in Latin American Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/30040740openalex-snapshot
Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3013506openalex-snapshot
The Subordinate State System of Southern Africa
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3013941openalex-snapshot
The Middle East Subordinate System and Its Impact on Israel's Foreign Policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3234535openalex-snapshot
Polyarchy & Participation: The Changing Democratic Theory of Robert Dahl
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/421422openalex-snapshot
Regime Vulnerability and the Military Coup
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861431openalex-snapshot
Non-Western International Relations Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801884634openalex-snapshot
Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-5852openalex-snapshot
Development, democracy and welfare states: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-0637openalex-snapshot
Resort to war: a data guide to inter-state, extra-state, intra-state, and non-state wars, 1816-2007
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919146openalex-extracted
What, Where, Who, and Why? An Empirical Investigation of Positionality in Political Science Field Experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.908openalex-snapshot
Politicians and climate change: A systematic review of the literature
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02993-7_88-1openalex-snapshot
Komparative Area-Forschung in der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123422000436openalex-snapshot
Public Gender Egalitarianism: A Dataset of Dynamic Comparative Public Opinion toward Egalitarian Gender Roles in the Public Sphere
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123425100598openalex-snapshot
Paths to Power: A New Dataset on the Social Profile of Governments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096521001207openalex-snapshot
Reducing Bias in Wikipedia’s Coverage of Political Scientists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096522000385openalex-snapshot
Gender Research in Political Science Journals: A Dataset
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s104909652200066xopenalex-snapshot
What, Where, Who, and Why? An Empirical Investigation of Positionality in Political Science Field Experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669622000305openalex-snapshot
Law Reviews, Open Metadata and RSS Feeds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592722004145openalex-snapshot
Latin America and Comparative Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592724002755openalex-snapshot
Methodologies of Informed Intuition: The Role of Informed Intuition and Intuitive Openness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1682098326100241openalex-snapshot
The politics behind political science: A cross-national perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00319-9openalex-snapshot
Who are we? The diversity puzzle in European political science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1868998openalex-snapshot
Thirty years of Regional and Federal Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2024.2334470openalex-snapshot
Taking stock of the multilevel governance research programme: a systematic literature review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2025.2450622openalex-snapshot
The contribution of seven Annual Reviews of Regional Elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2023.2249321openalex-snapshot
100 Years of Solitude Revisited: A Critical Analysis of 25 Years of Scholarship on Colombia’s Civil Conflict
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2025.2572320openalex-snapshot
Defaulting to Inclusion: Producing Sample Datasets for the Global Data Science Classroom
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.2015574openalex-snapshot
Three Gaps in Computational Text Analysis Methods for Social Sciences: A Research Agenda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaf003openalex-snapshot
Elder, Am I Right? Age-Group Differences in Social and Political Interactions in Africa
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae003openalex-snapshot
Ontological Crisis and the Compartmentalization of Insecurities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viac027openalex-snapshot
The Middle East and North Africa in Political Science Scholarship: Analyzing Publication Patterns in Leading Journals, 1990–2019
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viac038openalex-snapshot
Where is Conflict Research? Western Bias in the Literature on Armed Violence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jopres/xjag060openalex-snapshot
Do protest bans make police repression more acceptable? Experimental evidence on the effects of legal repression from Turkey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197515037.013.41openalex-snapshot
Environment and Development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac037openalex-snapshot
Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20250000093004openalex-snapshot
Geographic Inequality in Management Scholarship: Data-driven Estimates and Trends
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12478openalex-snapshot
Studying European Radical Left Parties since the Fall of the Berlin Wall (1990–2019): A Scoping Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12641openalex-snapshot
Ethnicity and Elections: Electoral Context Affects Parties' Use of Ethnic References
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13478openalex-snapshot
Public Support for Gay Rights Across Countries and Over Time
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1134/s2079970525600490openalex-snapshot
Area Studies in the System of Social Sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102556openalex-snapshot
External Validity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00020397221085982openalex-snapshot
Dear German Academia: What is Your Role in African Knowledge Production?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221124610openalex-snapshot
Why Political Scientists Should Study Smaller Cities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281243openalex-snapshot
How to improve representativeness and cost-effectiveness in samples recruited through meta: A comparison of advertisement tools
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304907openalex-snapshot
Understanding the factors related to how East and Southeast Asian immigrant youth and families access mental health and substance use services: A scoping review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.1.007-025openalex-snapshot
Area Studies in the Social Sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220240154openalex-snapshot
O como, onde e o que da corrupção organizacional: uma revisão integrativa da literatura
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220240154xopenalex-snapshot
The how, where, and what of organizational corruption: an integrative literature review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/qr6caopenalex-snapshot
Introducing the Trust in Government (TrustGov) Dataset: A New Resource for Cross-National Time-Series Trust Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5355491openalex-snapshot
Authorship Patterns in Jihadism Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9mybfopenalex-snapshot
Challenges for multilingual computational text analysis researchers: evidence from a survey of social scientists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/74hymopenalex-snapshot
Public Support for Gay Rights Across Countries and Over Time
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/jvzq7openalex-snapshot
Open Editors: A Dataset of Scholarly Journals’ Editorial Board Positions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/k7caz_v1openalex-snapshot
Introducing the Trust in Government (TrustGov) Dataset: A New Resource for Cross-National Time-Series Trust Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.54885/gvog8437openalex-snapshot
What are academic journals good for? An editorial outlook on the possibilities of contemporary political research
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.