On the public citation graph

Comments on the Article “On Evaluating Molecular-Docking Methods for Pose Prediction and Enrichment Factors”

https://doi.org/10.1021/ci600460h
0 signed · 13 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20088openalex-snapshot
A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21642openalex-snapshot
VoteDock: Consensus docking method for prediction of protein–ligand interactions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21643openalex-snapshot
Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9169-8openalex-snapshot
Evaluating docking programs: keeping the playing field level
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2007.12.002openalex-snapshot
Towards improving compound selection in structure-based virtual screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1021/ci700052xopenalex-snapshot
Comparison of Topological, Shape, and Docking Methods in Virtual Screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1021/ci7003169openalex-snapshot
On Evaluating Molecular-Docking Methods for Pose Prediction and Enrichment Factors. [J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46, 401−415 (2006)] by
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1021/ci7004274openalex-snapshot
Cross-Docking of Inhibitors into CDK2 Structures. 1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1021/ci7004548openalex-snapshot
AutoShim: Empirically Corrected Scoring Functions for Quantitative Docking with a Crystal Structure and IC50 Training Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707515openalex-snapshot
Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx030openalex-snapshot
Comprehensive assessment of flexible-ligand docking algorithms: current effectiveness and challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0285.2007.00571.xopenalex-snapshot
Signposts of Docking and Scoring in Drug Design
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2174/157340909787580863openalex-snapshot
Computational Intelligence Methods for Docking Scores
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.