On the public citation graph

Retention of raw data: A problem revisited.

0 signed · 35 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0038819openalex-snapshot
Responsibility for Raw Data.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039238openalex-snapshot
Retain the Original Data! Comment.

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15532.1zenodo-depositor-declared
A primer for choosing, designing and evaluating registered reports for qualitative methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15532.2zenodo-depositor-declared
A primer for choosing, designing and evaluating registered reports for qualitative methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1388openalex-snapshot
A study of the determinants of psychologists' data sharing and open data badge adoption
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401120openalex-snapshot
Factors affecting psychologists' adoption of an open data badge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13472-3_52openalex-snapshot
Data Sharing in Social Sciences: Case Study on Charles University
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-020934-0.50017-xopenalex-snapshot
References
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.002openalex-snapshot
Reproducibility and replicability crisis: How management compares to psychology and economics – A systematic review of literature
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.007openalex-snapshot
Social scientists’ data sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.03.001openalex-snapshot
Attitudinal, normative, and resource factors affecting psychologists’ intentions to adopt an open data badge: An empirical analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190520000057openalex-snapshot
Outliers in L2 Research in Applied Linguistics: A Synthesis and Data Re-Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.33.4.381openalex-snapshot
Secondary analysis: The case for data archives.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.44.4.741openalex-snapshot
Reporting primary data in scientific articles: Technical solutions to a perennial problem.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.726openalex-snapshot
The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1995.10476121openalex-snapshot
Editor's Notes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1995.10476122openalex-snapshot
Computer Algebra Systems: Maple and Mathematica
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2017.1396214openalex-snapshot
The poor availability of syntaxes of structural equation modeling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1177083x.2021.1922465openalex-snapshot
Understanding the data‐sharing debate in the context of Aotearoa/New Zealand: a narrative review on the perspectives of funders, publishers/journals, researchers, participants and Māori collectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2010.482219openalex-snapshot
Can Structural Equation Models in Second Language Testing and Learning Research be Successfully Replicated?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547openalex-snapshot
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251409658openalex-snapshot
Investigating Data Sharing Practices in Teaching Effectiveness Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0401_16openalex-snapshot
Reply to van der Ploeg, Vetter, and Kleijn
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/inte.13.4.20openalex-snapshot
The Ombudsman: Cheating in Management Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252047openalex-snapshot
Data management and sharing: Practices and perceptions of psychology researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289380openalex-snapshot
Care to share? Experimental evidence on code sharing behavior in the social sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.13openalex-snapshot
Are We Wasting a Good Crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the Storm
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-91.1.14openalex-snapshot
A Brief History of Data Sharing in the U.S. Long Term Ecological Research Network
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.11-ds4openalex-snapshot
Facilitating Data Sharing in the Behavioural Sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x016003012openalex-snapshot
The Fate of the Files
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/qns25openalex-snapshot
The Poor Availability of Syntaxes of Structural Equation Modeling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/2azkfopenalex-snapshot
A Primer for Choosing, Designing and Evaluating Registered Reports for Qualitative Methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7g3aeopenalex-snapshot
Data Management and Sharing: Practices and Perceptions of Psychology Researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3758/bf03203137openalex-snapshot
Using computers to disseminate scientific information: The potential of optical disk based journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-014openalex-snapshot
A Critical Literature Review of Historic Scientific Analog Data: Uses, Successes, and Challenges
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.