On the public citation graph

Funding: Australia's grant system wastes time.

0 signed · 41 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4766918openalex-extracted
Speed Up or Slow Down? Impact of Research Funding on the Time Span for Academic Career Success
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/eas2.12019openalex-snapshot
A heart model of Earth Stewardship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76066-2_3openalex-snapshot
From Hadronic Bubbles to Quantum Gravity: Chasing the Infinite with Antonio Aurilia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-015-9270-9openalex-snapshot
The Academic Manifesto: From an Occupied to a Public University
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2110-3openalex-snapshot
An efficient system to fund science: from proposal review to peer-to-peer distributions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00903-8openalex-snapshot
Am I an Education Researcher?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2020.100744openalex-snapshot
A manifesto for failure: Depersonalising, collectivising and embracing failure in research funding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009381338.005openalex-snapshot
Grant Pursuit
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009381338.006openalex-snapshot
Grant Writers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009699785.013openalex-snapshot
Notes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2015.22openalex-snapshot
Successes, challenges and developments in Australian rheumatology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65660-9openalex-snapshot
Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2023004openalex-snapshot
Peut-on affranchir la recherche biomédicale du modèle managérial ?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/py16068openalex-snapshot
Developing research priorities in Australian primary health care: a focus on nutrition and physical activity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1124849openalex-snapshot
And the winner is … : inter-rater reliability among scholarship assessors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2020.0118openalex-snapshot
Full Throttle: COVID-19 Open Science to Build Planetary Public Goods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2022.0041openalex-snapshot
Decolonizing Knowledge Upstream: New Ways to Deconstruct and Fight Disinformation in an Era of COVID-19, Extreme Digital Transformation, and Climate Emergency
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf015openalex-snapshot
Does new public management repel talent? Findings from a choice experiment among German researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-05-2015-0067openalex-snapshot
Consequences of KPIs and performance management in higher education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12127openalex-snapshot
Can research development bursaries for patient and public involvement have a positive impact on grant applications? A UK ‐based, small‐scale service evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002800openalex-snapshot
On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004462openalex-snapshot
The impact of funding deadlines on personal workloads, stress and family relationships: a qualitative study of Australian researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079581openalex-snapshot
Online survey exploring researcher experiences of research funding processes in the UK: the effort and burden of applying for funding and fulfilling reporting requirements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014523791openalex-snapshot
Public Engagement in Prioritizing Research Proposals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.124082.3openalex-snapshot
‘Science by consensus’ impedes scientific creativity and progress: A simple alternative to funding biomedical research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125886.1openalex-snapshot
Community review: a robust and scalable selection system for resource allocation within open science and innovation communities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125886.2openalex-snapshot
Community review: a robust and scalable selection system for resource allocation within open science and innovation communities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183967openalex-snapshot
How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239757openalex-snapshot
Decision-making approaches used by UK and international health funding organisations for allocating research funds: A survey of current practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/9789048532827openalex-snapshot
The Dutch National Research Agenda in perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/9789048532827-003openalex-snapshot
The Art and Science of Asking Questions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17387/bullentsocmalta.2018.01openalex-snapshot
Assessing biotic diversity : the glorious past, present, and the uncertain future
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1787/9173caba-enopenalex-snapshot
Améliorer l’efficience de l’investissement public en France
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0017openalex-snapshot
Unlocking institutional imagination: Introduction to conference proceedings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26867/se.2023.v12i2.153openalex-snapshot
The conflict of interest that is so grave that we all prefer to ignore it?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.35929/rsz.0097openalex-snapshot
Estimates of global biodiversity and costs of biodiversity research revisited, with a review of Sabah Scaphisoma Leach and descriptions of 56 new species (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scaphidiinae)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5117/9789462982796openalex-snapshot
The Dutch National Research Agenda in Perspective. A Reflection on Research and Science Policy in Practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5209/ciyc.55978openalex-snapshot
El manifiesto académico. De la universidad ocupada a la universidad libre
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v98n3.618openalex-snapshot
On the Need for Democratic Principles to Ensure Meritocracy in a Time of Research Funding Cuts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5694/mja14.01475openalex-snapshot
Peer review: maintaining trust in research funding decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5751/es-11005-240329openalex-snapshot
Rethinking resource allocation in science
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.