On the public citation graph

From responsible research to responsible innovation: challenges in implementation

https://doi.org/10.1049/enb.2017.0010
0 signed · 50 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.08.008openalex-snapshot
Scientists Should Oppose the Drive of Postmodern Ideology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.02.006openalex-snapshot
Science and Postmodernism: From Right-Thinking to Soft-Despotism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013866125341openalex-snapshot
Finding a Precautionary Approach to Technological Developments – Lessons for the Evaluation of GM Crops
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/431883aopenalex-snapshot
Going public
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/44006openalex-snapshot
Beyond ‘substantial equivalence’
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/471305aopenalex-snapshot
Intolerance: retain healthy scepticism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/471305bopenalex-snapshot
Intolerance: science informs, not defines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/471448dopenalex-snapshot
Intolerance: UK chief scientist responds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.288openalex-snapshot
When it pays to ask the public
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1042/ebc20160048openalex-snapshot
Synthetic biology and the prospects for responsible innovation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600624063openalex-snapshot
The governance of agro- and pharmaceutical biotechnology innovation: Public policy and industrial strategy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870010027640openalex-snapshot
More Faust than Frankenstein: the European debate about the precautionary principle and risk regulation for genetically modified crops
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195378016.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Going to Extremes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1159/000092659openalex-snapshot
Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0011-xopenalex-snapshot
Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0026-yopenalex-snapshot
Reflections on different governance styles in regulating science: a contribution to ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.3844.3681openalex-snapshot
See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056886-9-enopenalex-snapshot
The Bioeconomy of 2030
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056886-enopenalex-snapshot
The Bioeconomy to 2030

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4678559openalex-extracted
Responsible Innovation for Disruptive Science and Technology: Modelling the Pathways for Building Public Trust and Expectations of Socially Responsible Outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4766898openalex-extracted
Exploring Responsible and Sustainable Agricultural Innovation Via an Agency-Convened Mission and Key Enabling Technology Development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4836221openalex-extracted
Exploring Responsible and Sustainable Agricultural Innovation Via an Agency-Convened Mission and Key Enabling Technology Development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781394284122.ch1openalex-snapshot
Socially Responsible Research (SRR)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37810-3_5openalex-snapshot
Reflections on Standards for Responsible—and High-Quality—Research: A Call for Peace
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09789-wopenalex-snapshot
Genome Editing and Responsible Innovation, Can They Be Reconciled?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104359openalex-snapshot
“The end point is a… more appropriate innovation ecosystem” Mission-oriented and responsible innovation in Australian agricultural systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100036openalex-snapshot
A method for ethical AI in defence: A case study on developing trustworthy autonomous systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.009openalex-snapshot
Beyond the limits to governance: New rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123849openalex-snapshot
Public perceptions of responsible innovation: Validation of a scale measuring societal perceptions of responsible innovation in science and technology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102875openalex-snapshot
Innovation intermediaries at the convergence of digital technologies, sustainability, and governance: A case study of AI-enabled engineering biology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102709openalex-snapshot
Responsible innovation for disruptive science and technology: The role of public trust and social expectations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103207openalex-snapshot
Australian public opinions of responsible innovation: Understanding its champions, supporters, moderates, and sceptics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1049/enb2.12005openalex-snapshot
Responsible innovation: Its role in an era of technological and regulatory transformation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1049/enb2.12031openalex-snapshot
Analysing responsible innovation along a value chain—A single‐cell protein case study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1573983openalex-snapshot
Political influences on biotechnology-based innovation for European agriculture: risk-assessment and risk management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1667617openalex-snapshot
Expanding the field of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) – from responsible research to responsible innovation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1495033openalex-snapshot
Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1511329openalex-snapshot
Cataloguing the barriers facing RRI in innovation pathways: a response to the dilemma of societal alignment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1676685openalex-snapshot
Synthesizing an implementation framework for responsible research and innovation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1800969openalex-snapshot
Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/synbio/ysy016openalex-snapshot
Cell-free prototyping strategies for enhancing the sustainable production of polyhydroxyalkanoates bioplastics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00468-xopenalex-snapshot
The embeddedness of responsible research innovation in Sabadell’s territorial policies: the case of smart specialization in industrial systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1242/dev.201170openalex-snapshot
Exploring the challenges and opportunities of public engagement with fundamental biology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v15i38.11100openalex-snapshot
REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC POTENTIAL IN THE 21ST CENTURY:
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v15i38.11102openalex-snapshot
INTRODUCTION OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF INFORMATIZATION OF SOCIETY:
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.19080/asm.2020.05.555671openalex-snapshot
Innovation Management and International standards – how they Relate to Research Institutes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1436368openalex-snapshot
Influence of gender and academic level on the development of digital competencies in university teachers: a multidisciplinary comparative analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.677003openalex-snapshot
Cultural Beliefs and Stakeholder Affiliation Influence Attitudes Towards Responsible Research and Innovation Among United States Stakeholders Involved in Biotechnology and Gene Editing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.54337/irspbl-11100openalex-snapshot
A Comparative Analysis of Embedding Responsible Innovation in Integrated Engineering Curricula
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.58248/pb50openalex-snapshot
Genome edited animals
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.