On the public citation graph

Analyzing Argumentation in Planning and Public Policy: Assessing, Improving, and Transcending the Toulmin Model

0 signed · 28 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4676637openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0065-3_23openalex-snapshot
Moving Beyond Text: Multi-modal Expansion of the Toulmin Model for Enhanced AI Legal Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-84334-751-4.50019-4openalex-snapshot
Bibliography
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111489openalex-snapshot
OntoAgency: An agency-based ontology for tracing control, ownership and decision-making in smart buildings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104693openalex-snapshot
Semantic knowledge modeling and evaluation of argument Theory to develop dialogue based patient education systems for chronic disease Self-Management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101141openalex-snapshot
Insights into beliefs on 11 + testing in Trinidad and Tobago through an interpretation/use argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008796822813openalex-snapshot
Folding Arguments: A Method for Representing Conflicting Views of a Conflict
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000070openalex-snapshot
Fallacious argumentation in design review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1068/b3048openalex-snapshot
Analyzing Planning and Design Discourses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1068/b31178openalex-snapshot
Representing Urban Development Plans and Regulations as Data: A Planning Data Model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2021.1929086openalex-snapshot
From ‘merchants and ministers’ to ‘neutral brokers’? Water diplomacy aspirations by the Netherlands – a discourse analysis of the 2011 commissioned advisory report
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2010.12001618openalex-snapshot
Trees and Water: Mainstreaming Environment in the Graduate Policy Analysis Curriculum
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/713666431openalex-snapshot
The Rhetorical Side of Transport Planning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac026openalex-snapshot
Use of science in public policy: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic efforts to ‘Follow the Science’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-07-2020-0225openalex-snapshot
How does government discourse make people vulnerable?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12670openalex-snapshot
Analysing the Macrostructure of Spoken Strategic Communication: An Application of Argumentation Analysis on High‐Technology Newly Public Firms’ Earnings Conference Calls
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x221111755openalex-snapshot
Arguments as Tools for Assessing Images of Transport in Urban Planning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/074108830201900105openalex-snapshot
Contextualizing Toulmin's Model in the Writing Classroom
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/14649934221080828openalex-snapshot
‘Making Strange’: Discourse Analysis Tools for Teaching Critical Development Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783112221174-010openalex-snapshot
225The Merits of the Toulmin Argumentation Model for the Analysis of Visual Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1527/tjsai.17.32openalex-snapshot
A Legal Negotiatiton Support System Based on A Diagram
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18397/kcgr.2012.16.1.167openalex-snapshot
A Study on the Policy Argument of Saemangeum Project - Focused on the Comparison of Argument for and against Saemangeum Project -
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18398/kjlgas.2017.31.3.101openalex-snapshot
A Study on Policy Argument for Nuclear Power Generation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202504.2418.v1openalex-snapshot
Discourse of Military-Assisted Urban Regeneration in Colombo: Political and Elite Influences on Displacing Underserved Communities in Postwar Sri Lanka
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.25916/sut.26268808openalex-snapshot
Investigating collaboration in interdisciplinary design teams
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26806/fd.v10i2.276openalex-snapshot
Apel na sobeckost nebo na rozumnost? Případová analýza s využitím Toulminova modelu argumentu
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26806/fd.v10i2.408openalex-snapshot
Apel na sobeckost nebo na rozumnost? Případová analýza s využitím Toulminova modelu argumentu
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n11p129openalex-snapshot
Using Concept Cartoons and Argumentative Writing Frames in Mathematical Word Problem Solving
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.