On the public citation graph

Shortfalls in extinction risk assessments for plants

0 signed · 44 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9973-zopenalex-snapshot
The pitfall-trap of species conservation priority setting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01697-9openalex-snapshot
Using IUCN criteria to perform rapid assessments of at-risk taxa
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.013openalex-snapshot
What do conservation biologists publish?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.030openalex-snapshot
What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108261openalex-snapshot
Reading the black book: The number, timing, distribution and causes of listed extinctions in Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2017.10.004openalex-snapshot
Plant conservation in the Anthropocene – Challenges and future prospects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010openalex-snapshot
The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1367943004001799openalex-snapshot
Taxonomic bias in reintroduction projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1109-6openalex-snapshot
Open Science principles for accelerating trait-based science across the Tree of Life
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09010182.xopenalex-snapshot
Recovery Plans and the Endangered Species Act: Are Criticisms Supported by Data?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804098115openalex-snapshot
Predicting plant conservation priorities on a global scale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390197055openalex-snapshot
The Taxonomic Impediment Overcome: NSF's Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy (PEET) as a Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/(issn)1467-9469openalex-snapshot
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13071openalex-snapshot
Quantifying progress toward a conservation assessment for all plants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13382openalex-snapshot
Relative costs of conserving threatened species across taxonomic groups
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13454openalex-snapshot
A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00806.xopenalex-snapshot
Measuring progress in US endangered species conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00186.xopenalex-snapshot
Avian Conservation under the Endangered Species Act: Expenditures versus Recovery Priorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00232.xopenalex-snapshot
taxonstand: An r package for species names standardisation in vegetation databases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512openalex-snapshot
Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.297.5579.191bopenalex-snapshot
Taxonomic Bias in Conservation Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0169:febnap]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
Funding Extinction? Biological Needs and Political Realities in the Allocation of Resources to Endangered Species Recovery
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/060077.1openalex-snapshot
The (bio)diversity of science reflects the interests of society
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0479:lofscf]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[409:tbosrt]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
The (bio)diversity of science reflects the interests of society
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[271:cffic]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3146938openalex-snapshot
An Update on Priorities and Expenditures under the Endangered Species Act
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/4450624openalex-snapshot
Preventing Plant Blindness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/4615733openalex-snapshot
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.520.1.2zenodo-depositor-declared
Threat patterns and conservation status of endemic vascular flora in Argentina: a quantitative perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18268-6_7openalex-snapshot
Overcoming Segregation Problematics for Environmentally Accountable and Transformative Policy in a Changing Climate: The Case of Australia’s EPBC Act
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109193openalex-snapshot
Counting plants: The extent and adequacy of monitoring for a continental-scale list of threatened plant species
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111183openalex-snapshot
Rapid assessments accurately identify threatened Australian flora under IUCN Red List Criteria after megafires
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/bt22009openalex-snapshot
Frameworks for identifying priority plants and ecosystems most impacted by major fires
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.29.651190openalex-snapshot
300 billion years of angiosperm evolution at risk of extinction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70004openalex-snapshot
Parallels and discrepancies between non‐native species introductions and human migration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14413openalex-snapshot
Conceptual model for assessing a science–policy–management framework for threat mitigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70160openalex-snapshot
Assessing recovery and conservation of Australian freshwater fishes with the IUCN Green Status of Species and structured expert elicitation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12845openalex-snapshot
Prioritizing nationally endemic species for conservation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13265openalex-snapshot
High fire frequency and the impact of the 2019–2020 megafires on Australian plant diversity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1126/science.adz0773openalex-snapshot
High risk of extinction across the flowering plant tree of life
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5962/p.373878openalex-snapshot
Introducing the action plan for Australia's Imperilled plants 2021
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5962/p.373905openalex-snapshot
Plant conservation in Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.23.720284openalex-snapshot
Revealing the Widespread Bias of Extinction Risk in the Antarctic and the Southern Ocean
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.