On the public citation graph
Nest-box use by arboreal mammals in a peri-urban landscape
0 signed · 67 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9244-6openalex-snapshot
Socio-Economics and Vegetation Change in Urban Ecosystems: Patterns in Space and Time
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(91)90047-yopenalex-snapshot
Characteristics of hollow-bearing trees occupied by arboreal marsupials in the montane ash forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria, south-east Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(93)90024-hopenalex-snapshot
The abundance and development of cavities in Eucalyptus trees: a case study in the montane forests of Victoria, southeastern Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.003openalex-snapshot
The abundance of hollow-bearing trees in urban dry sclerophyll forest and the effect of wind on hollow development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.026openalex-snapshot
Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00109-4openalex-snapshot
Hollow selection by vertebrate fauna in forests of southeastern Australia and implications for forest management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00222-1openalex-snapshot
The habitat requirements of the rufous treecreeper ( Climacteris rufa ). 1. Preferential habitat use demonstrated at multiple spatial scales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00142-3openalex-snapshot
Gap-crossing by gliding marsupials: thresholds for use of isolated woodland patches in an agricultural landscape
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00594-1openalex-snapshot
Habitat preferences of squirrel gliders, Petaurus norfolcensis, in the fragmented landscape of southeast Queensland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-8903.2002.00088.xopenalex-snapshot
The value of ‘bat boxes’ for attracting hollow‐dependent fauna to farm forestry plantations in southeast Queensland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643090033openalex-snapshot
Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/am97079openalex-snapshot
Use of Tree Hollows by Two Sympatric Gliding Possums, The Squirrel Glider, Petaurus norfolcensis and The Sugar Glider, P. breviceps.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr01014openalex-snapshot
The effect of drought on body size, growth and abundance of wild brush-tailed phascogales ( Phascogale tapoatafa ) in south-western Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr01024openalex-snapshot
Effects of habitat fragmentation on the demography, movements and social organisation of the eastern pygmy-possum ( Cercartetus nanus ) in northern New South Wales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr02047openalex-snapshot
The use of nest boxes by arboreal marsupials in the forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr04106openalex-snapshot
The use of nest boxes in urban natural vegetation remnants by vertebrate fauna
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr04109openalex-snapshot
The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr06174openalex-snapshot
Do feathertail gliders show a preference for nest box design?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr08007openalex-snapshot
The use of hollow-bearing trees by vertebrate fauna in wet and dry Eucalyptus obliqua forest, Tasmania
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr08064openalex-snapshot
Use of artificial tree hollows by Australian birds and bats
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr9830249openalex-snapshot
Introduction of the Sugar Glider, Petaurus breviceps, into Re-established Forest of the Tower Hill State Game Reserve, Vic.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr9840255openalex-snapshot
Use of Nest Boxes by Forest Vertebrates in Gippsland: Acceptance, Preference and Demand
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr99107openalex-snapshot
Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr9950471openalex-snapshot
Population ecology of the squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) and the sugar glider (P. breviceps) (Maruspialia : Petauridae) at Limeburners Creek, on the central north coast of New South Wales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/wr9960755openalex-snapshot
Field Observations on the Common Striped Possum (Dactylopsila Trivirgata) in North Queensland.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-31-11-1992openalex-snapshot
Economics of a nest-box program for the conservation of an endangered species: a reappraisal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1139/x02-142openalex-snapshot
Comment Economics of a nest-box program for the conservation of an endangered species: a re-appraisal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3803088openalex-snapshot
Suggestions for Presenting the Results of Data Analyses
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5214.4.1zenodo-depositor-declared
Catalogue of the Australian social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.74280openalex-snapshot
Can Artificial Tree Cavities Provide Population Support to Cavity‐Dependent Non‐Flying Mammals?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01530-4openalex-snapshot
Use of wildlife-friendly structures in residential gardens by animal wildlife: evidence from citizen scientists in a global biodiversity hotspot
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1461-4openalex-snapshot
Does nest box use reduce the fitness of a tree‐cavity dependent mammal?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2024.05.004openalex-snapshot
Mammal Mia: A review on how ecological and human dimension research on urban wild mammals can benefit future biophilic cities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.006openalex-snapshot
Comparing the thermal suitability of nest-boxes and tree-hollows for the conservation-management of arboreal marsupials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.017openalex-snapshot
Effects of entrance size, tree size and landscape context on nest box occupancy: Considerations for management and biodiversity offsets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119122openalex-snapshot
Can chainsaw carved hollows provide an effective solution to the loss of natural tree cavities for arboreal mammals?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119747openalex-snapshot
Occupancy of chainsaw-carved hollows by an Australian arboreal mammal is influenced by cavity attributes and surrounding habitat
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121915openalex-snapshot
Nestbox use indicates declining arboreal mammals in an Australian savanna may be limited by tree hollow availability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122343openalex-snapshot
One size does not fit all: Intra– and interspecific variation of den site use in two marsupial glider species in fragmented forest
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.004openalex-snapshot
Distribution and abundance of hollow-bearing trees in urban forest fragments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/am10050openalex-snapshot
Den trees, hollow-bearing trees and nest boxes: management of squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) nest sites in tropical Australian woodland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/am14040openalex-snapshot
Temperature variation in nest boxes in eastern Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/am24010openalex-snapshot
Habitat preferences of arboreal mammals in box-ironbark forest during maternal and non-maternal periods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/az26004openalex-snapshot
Adaptive management of artificial hollows: a case study evaluating carved tree hollows as an emerging restoration tool for hollow-dependent fauna
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/mu13065openalex-snapshot
Distribution of tree-hollows and hollow preferences by parrots in an urban landscape
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/pc25043openalex-snapshot
Supplementary habitat use by endangered southern greater gliders (Petauroides volans)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/rs25002openalex-snapshot
The use of artificial hollows by tree hollow-using Australian marsupials: what have we learnt in the past 20 years?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/wr09111openalex-snapshot
Detecting, but not affecting, nest-box occupancy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/zo11081openalex-snapshot
Characteristics of tree hollows used by Australian arboreal and scansorial mammals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2017.1364473openalex-snapshot
Using residents’ attitudes, knowledge and behaviours to improve biodiversity conservation in an Australian rural–urban landscape
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2071343openalex-snapshot
To change or not to change? Perceived psychological barriers to individuals’ behavioural changes in favour of biodiversity conservation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12776openalex-snapshot
Artificial refuges for wildlife conservation: what is the state of the science?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13095openalex-snapshot
Creating wildlife habitat using artificial structures: a review of their efficacy and potential use in solar farms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12245openalex-snapshot
Conserving and restoring endangered southern populations of the Squirrel Glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) in agricultural landscapes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12408openalex-snapshot
Nest box contentions: Are nest boxes used by the species they target?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12208openalex-snapshot
Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity‐dependent arboreal mammals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12303openalex-snapshot
Enriching small trees with artificial nest boxes cannot mimic the value of large trees for hollow‐nesting birds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12306openalex-snapshot
Do nest boxes in restored woodlands promote the conservation of hollow‐dependent fauna?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13319openalex-snapshot
Do nest boxes breed the target species or its competitors? A case study of a critically endangered bird
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.25911/5d67b7313119eopenalex-snapshot
Maintaining and perpetuating habitat structures for wildlife in modified landscapes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111807openalex-snapshot
Alien vs. Predator: Impacts of Invasive Species and Native Predators on Urban Nest Box Use by Native Birds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4040052openalex-snapshot
Population Viability of an Endangered Population of Greater Gliders (Petauroides volans) and Management Implications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/f9050235openalex-snapshot
Chainsaw-Carved Cavities Better Mimic the Thermal Properties of Natural Tree Hollows than Nest Boxes and Log Hollows
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su142416490openalex-snapshot
The Greater the Contact, the Closer the Threat: The Influence of Contact with Nature on the Social Perception of Biodiversity Loss and the Effectiveness of Conservation Behaviours
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.132122openalex-snapshot
Forest Conservation Policy Implementation Gaps: Consequences for the Management of Hollow-bearing Trees in Australia
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.