On the public citation graph
Evaluating Measures of Campaign Tone
0 signed · 64 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500036603openalex-snapshot
The Tradition and its Tensions - Charles E. Curran: Catholic Social Teaching 1891- Present: A Historical, Theological, and Ethical Analysis. (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2002. Pp. ix, 261. $49.95. $19.95, paper.)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592705490258openalex-snapshot
Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600152400374openalex-snapshot
Weighted Content Analysis of Political Advertisements
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/105846002317246461openalex-snapshot
Lessons Learned: Campaign Advertising in the 2000 Elections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00047openalex-snapshot
New Evidence for New Arguments: Money and Advertising in the 1996 Senate Elections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00143openalex-snapshot
Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00007openalex-snapshot
Why Is Research on the Effects of Negative Campaigning So Inconclusive? Understanding Citizens’ Perceptions of Negativity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00098.xopenalex-snapshot
Campaign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00386.xopenalex-snapshot
Inside the Black Box of Negative Campaign Effects: Three Reasons Why Negative Campaigns Mobilize
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290205500406openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Negative Campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 Senatorial Primaries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800104openalex-snapshot
When Primary Campaigns Go Negative: The Determinants of Campaign Negativity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200204openalex-snapshot
From the Inner Ring Out: News Congruence, Cue-Taking, and Campaign Coverage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691227924openalex-snapshot
The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2082710openalex-snapshot
Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2586117openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2586118openalex-snapshot
Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2991771openalex-snapshot
A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2991823openalex-snapshot
Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ddd11gopenalex-snapshot
The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1918369openalex-extracted
Truth in Advertising? Visuals, Sound, and the Factual Accuracy of Political Advertising
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2486711openalex-extracted
(Mis)Information and the Electorate: The Dynamics and Individual Level Effects of Political Advertising Claims
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4116302openalex-extracted
Two Decades of Political Advertising (2001-2021) - a Bibliometric Clustered Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4498344openalex-extracted
Effects of Political Advertising - A Research Agenda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56735-8_2openalex-snapshot
The Ideological Incentive for Campaigning on Corruption Issues: The Two-Party Case
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.10.003openalex-snapshot
Raising the tone? The impact of ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ campaigning on voting in the 2007 Scottish Parliament election
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102275openalex-snapshot
Candidate appearance in campaign advertisements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.4openalex-snapshot
Disproportionality in media representations of campaign negativity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1468109911000181openalex-snapshot
Negative Campaigning in No-Cabinet Alternation Systems: Ideological Closeness and Blames of Corruption in Italy and Japan Using Party Manifesto Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773909990269openalex-snapshot
Beyond American negativity: toward a general understanding of the determinants of negative campaigning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05228-wopenalex-snapshot
Comparable 2022 General Election Advertising Datasets from Meta and Google
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-019-00084-8openalex-snapshot
Negative campaigning and its consequences: a review and a look ahead
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2012.681667openalex-snapshot
Modelling negative campaign advertising: evidence from Taiwan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.996194openalex-snapshot
Areas of research in political advertising: a review and research agenda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2026.2679380openalex-snapshot
The intersection of advertising and politics: a bibliometric analysis of four decades of research and its imperative for theory building in the algorithmic age
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08965803.2025.2518816openalex-snapshot
A Home is More than a House – Does the Tone in Listing Texts Matter to Homebuyers?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.879362openalex-snapshot
Attack and Response in Political Campaigns: An Experimental Study in Two Parts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2015.1081070openalex-snapshot
Negative Campaigning in Turkish Elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.858749openalex-snapshot
News Media Framing of Negative Campaigning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2022.2040690openalex-snapshot
How Candidates Influence Each Other in Electoral Politics: Intercandidate Agenda-Building in Florida’s 2018 Midterm Election
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17457280903275030openalex-snapshot
Campaign News and Vote Intentions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1784775openalex-snapshot
Of Disputes and Petitions: Exploring Media Framing of the 2012 Presidential Election Petition In Ghana
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12160openalex-snapshot
Critical coverage: How the media criticize supreme courts—Evidence from Israel
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13391openalex-snapshot
Timing and responsiveness in American political advertising campaigns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817724174openalex-snapshot
Fighting for attention: Media coverage of negative campaign messages
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1369148119842038openalex-snapshot
Unintended consequences of negative campaigning: Backlash and second-preference boost effects in a multi-party context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616617openalex-snapshot
Understanding variations in user response to social media campaigns: A study of Facebook posts in the 2010 US elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427800openalex-snapshot
Negativity in political news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x211042001openalex-snapshot
Reexamining the Effects of Electoral Competition on Negative Advertising
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210374122openalex-snapshot
Negative Campaigning across Different Communication Channels: Different Ball Games?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219843404openalex-snapshot
Measures of Campaign Negativity: Comparing Approaches and Eliminating Partisan Bias
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/wpsr-2014-0018openalex-snapshot
Negative and Personalized Campaign Rhetoric: Party Communication and Media Coverage of Danish Parliamentary Elections 1994–2011
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17615/129y-wq18openalex-snapshot
Debating Debate: Measuring Discursive Overlap on the Congressional Floor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4293openalex-snapshot
Using Campaign Communications to Analyze Civility in Ranked Choice Voting Elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2024.37.85670openalex-snapshot
Percepciones y usos de la negatividad en la comunicación política: elecciones generales españolas de 2019
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.23545openalex-snapshot
De la castagne en campagne : la communication électorale négative, fait politique et objet d’étude
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2016-1089openalex-snapshot
La negatividad en las informaciones políticas de los medios españoles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003029205-7openalex-snapshot
Voters' emotional response to negative campaign messages
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2014-4-588openalex-snapshot
Negativität in der Politikberichterstattung. Deutschland, Österreich und die Schweiz im Vergleich
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.62876/tc.v1i48.6584openalex-snapshot
Negatividad en la comunicación política, indicadores y alternativas: percepciones en la España de 2019
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v4i1.2138openalex-snapshot
Soft news i 2007-valgkampen: Balanceret, men ukritisk snak om mennesker i politik
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v45i4.70009openalex-snapshot
Negativ og personfokuseret kampagneretorik. Partiernes kommunikation og mediernes dækning ved folketingsvalg 1994-2011
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.