Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository
metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is
labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not
evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
Where Have All the Scientific and Academic Freedoms Gone? And What Is ‘Adequate for Science’? The Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress and Its Applications
Comparing Ethical and Epistemic Standards for Investigative Journalists and Equity-Oriented Collaborative Community-Based Researchers: Why Working for a University Matters
Genuine risks or a threat to academic autonomy? Critical reflections on research ethics reviews of studies involving ‘vulnerable’ children and young people
Improving the Ethics Review of Qualitative Health Research: A Comparison of Review Practices and Suggestions for Improvement by Researchers and Members of Research Ethics Committees
Book Review: Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research (Morality and Society Series) Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research (Morality and Society Series)StarkLauraUniversity of Chicago Press, Chicago20129780226770864 (hb)Ethical Imperialism: Institutional…
Book Review: Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965-2009 Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965-2009SchragZachary M.The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London20109780801894909 (hb)
Between the accountable and the auditable: Ethics and ethical governance in the social sciences SchragZachary M, Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. USA: Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.StarkLaura, Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and…
Qualitative health research and procedural ethics: An interview study to investigate researchers’ ways of navigating the demands of medical research ethics committees in Germany
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.