On the public citation graph
Gender-Correlated Systematics in HST Proposal Selection
0 signed · 47 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00167-4openalex-snapshot
How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018839203698openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109openalex-snapshot
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014002277openalex-snapshot
Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.014openalex-snapshot
Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.2.175openalex-snapshot
Effects of Structural Position on Allocation and Evaluation Decisions for Scientists and Engineers in Industrial R&D
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asna.70063openalex-snapshot
Unveiling the Cosmos: XMM ‐Newton's Scientific Strategy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69004-4_4openalex-snapshot
XMM-Newton Observing Time Proposals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69004-4_5openalex-snapshot
INTEGRAL Observing Time Proposals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69004-4_6openalex-snapshot
Herschel Observing Time Proposals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105239openalex-snapshot
Allocating time on scientific platforms in outer space: Evidence from James Webb Space Telescope Cycle 1-3 general observer programs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2025.10006openalex-snapshot
Validation of a checklist-style intervention for mitigation of availability bias in professional designers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/528471aopenalex-snapshot
Science and gender: Scientists must work harder on equality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02064-yopenalex-snapshot
NASA changes how it divvies up telescope time to reduce gender bias
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0141openalex-snapshot
Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0936-3openalex-snapshot
Promoting gender equality in the European astronomical community
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0954-1openalex-snapshot
Diversity and inclusion in Australian astronomy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0961-2openalex-snapshot
A dynamical systems description of privilege, power and leadership in academia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1068-5openalex-snapshot
Inequalities faced by women in access to permanent positions in astronomy in France
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01341-zopenalex-snapshot
Closing the gender gap in the Australian astronomy workforce
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01830-9openalex-snapshot
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on publishing in astronomy in the initial two years
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ab3e18openalex-snapshot
Systematics in the ALMA Proposal Review Rankings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ab6ce0openalex-snapshot
Dual-anonymization Yields Promising Results for Reducing Gender Bias: A Naturalistic Field Experiment of Applications for Hubble Space Telescope Time
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ac32b0openalex-snapshot
Gender Systematics in the NRAO Proposal Review System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ac5b89openalex-snapshot
Update on the Systematics in the ALMA Proposal Review Process After Cycle 8
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ac83f1openalex-snapshot
Gender Disparity in Publishing Six Months after the KITP Workshop Probes of Transport in Stars
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ad0d7bopenalex-snapshot
SDSS-IV from 2014 to 2016: A Detailed Demographic Comparison over Three Years
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/astrogeo/atw219openalex-snapshot
Women of the future in the RAS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064263openalex-snapshot
Thinking Beyond the Default User: The Impact of Gender, Stereotypes, and Modality on Interpretation of User Needs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.2314973openalex-snapshot
Sex-disaggregated systematics in Canadian time allocation committee telescope proposal reviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.3020740openalex-snapshot
Impact of dual anonymous peer review on ESO telescope time allocations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/15291006231163179openalex-snapshot
Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/27325016231170512openalex-snapshot
The Annual ASCFS Whitaker Lecture: Breaking Through to Bold
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa6112openalex-snapshot
The Proposal Auto-Categorizer and Manager for Time Allocation Review at the Space Telescope Science Institute
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/aaecd6openalex-snapshot
Prestige Bias on Time Allocation Committees?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3847/25c2cfeb.299343ebopenalex-snapshot
(Un)conscious Bias in the Astronomical Profession: Universal Recommendations to improve Fairness, Inclusiveness, and Representation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3847/25c2cfeb.450d4855openalex-snapshot
The Value of a Dual Anonymous System for Reducing Bias in Reviews of Planetary Research and Analysis Proposals and Scientific Papers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3847/25c2cfeb.d73b7960openalex-snapshot
A socio-demographic study of the exoplanet direct imaging community
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3895/cgt.v16n47.14546openalex-snapshot
Abrindo a caixa-preta das Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas: perspectivas e desafios para a igualdade de gênero
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1612.01025openalex-snapshot
Women of the Future in the Royal Astronomical Society
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1810.01511openalex-snapshot
The Leaky Pipeline for Postdocs: A study of the time between receiving a PhD and securing a faculty job for male and female astronomers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1907.04893openalex-snapshot
The Nonbinary Fraction: Looking Towards the Future of Gender Equity in Astronomy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-53-169-2020openalex-snapshot
Participation of women scientists in ESA solar system missions: a historical trend
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0139openalex-snapshot
Taking off the Blinders: A Comparative Study of University Students’ Changing Perceptions of Gender Discrimination in the Workplace From 2006 to 2013
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.