On the public citation graph
Do Collaborators in Science Need to Agree?
0 signed · 84 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-009-9194-6openalex-snapshot
The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9887-1openalex-snapshot
A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0172-1openalex-snapshot
Epistemic dependence in interdisciplinary groups
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0225-5openalex-snapshot
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1294-7openalex-snapshot
Vindicating methodological triangulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnre.2016.01.001openalex-snapshot
Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.07.007openalex-snapshot
Science as collective knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.07.011openalex-snapshot
Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2014.9openalex-snapshot
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH, DELIBERATION, AND INNOVATION
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060033openalex-snapshot
Converting Threats into Opportunities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-01023-3openalex-snapshot
Robust research needs many lines of evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720701674288openalex-snapshot
Who has Scientific Knowledge?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/338946openalex-snapshot
The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/680522openalex-snapshot
Values in Science: The Case of Scientific Collaboration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732617.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Making Medical Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665792.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Social Process Reliabilism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj017openalex-snapshot
A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-3516946openalex-snapshot
What Is Justified Group Belief?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.52openalex-snapshot
Masking Disagreement among Experts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5751/es-01861-110237openalex-snapshot
Empirically Based, Agent-based models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-5018openalex-snapshot
Socializing epistemology: the social dimensions of knowledge
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4683151openalex-extracted
(Re)Conceptualizations: Intentional Concept Development in the Social Sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13405-0_3openalex-snapshot
Du Bois on the Centralized Organization of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-13540-7_4openalex-snapshot
Kuhn’s Theory of Collective Rationality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-024-00968-8openalex-snapshot
Scientific and philosophical publication: the current state of affairs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03850-4openalex-snapshot
Aggregating agents with opinions about different propositions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04037-1openalex-snapshot
How should we promote transient diversity in science?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05360-5openalex-snapshot
An apology for the simple and small
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-023-00537-6openalex-snapshot
Socially responsible science: Exploring the complexities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.008openalex-snapshot
Sins of inquiry: How to criticize scientific pursuits
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108588782openalex-snapshot
The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2025.10041openalex-snapshot
Are Philosophers Functionally Integrated Enough to Socially Know?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2025.10092openalex-snapshot
The Group Agent Account and the Pluralistic Ignorance Problem
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2025.14openalex-snapshot
What is Collective Deliberation? Collective Deliberation as Shared Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.164openalex-snapshot
Minority Reports: Registering Dissent in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/714854openalex-snapshot
When Is Scientific Dissent Epistemically Inappropriate?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191998874.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Explanatory Particularism in Scientific Practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191998874.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Explanatory Particularism: Basics and Background
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191998874.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Interdisciplinarity and Explanation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191998874.003.0011openalex-snapshot
Integrated Understanding for Immunology and Epidemiology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191998874.003.0012openalex-snapshot
Systems Biology: Impediments to Integration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191998874.003.0013openalex-snapshot
Conclusion: Further Work
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191999215.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Groups as Epistemic and Moral Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191999215.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Group Belief for a Reason
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191999215.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Group Justified Belief and Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191999215.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Group Action for a Reason
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191999215.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Group Excuse from Blameless Ignorance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780191999215.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Concluding Remarks: Organized Groups as Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Scientific Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Testimony and the Scientific Enterprise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0003openalex-snapshot
The Nature of Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Scientific Justification as the Basis of Scientific Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Intra-Scientific Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Public Scientific Testimony I
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Public Scientific Testimony II
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0008openalex-snapshot
The Significance of Scentific Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.005.0001openalex-snapshot
List of Principles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70045openalex-snapshot
Divergence Arguments in Collective Epistemology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/w3xc5openalex-snapshot
How Should We Promote Transient Diversity in Science?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11010032openalex-snapshot
The Next Generation Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: History, Philosophy, and Culture
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.