On the public citation graph

The Relationship Between the European Court of Human Rights and the Human Rights Committee: Has the 'Same Matter' Already Been 'Examined'?

0 signed · 5 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3283270openalex-extracted

Country Context Report: LGBT People in Lesotho

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19281-5_3openalex-snapshot

Procedural Embedding

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139093606.007openalex-snapshot

The international human rights context

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589315000457openalex-snapshot

A DEFENCE OF THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND AN ARGUMENT FOR ITS APPLICATION BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1709447openalex-snapshot

Towards a common institutional trajectory? Individual complaints before UN treaty bodies during their ‘Booming’ years

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.