On the public citation graph
A Relevance-theoretic Framework for Constructing and Deconstructing Enthymemes
0 signed · 62 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56735-6_39openalex-snapshot
Management of preferences in assumption-based reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_3openalex-snapshot
Elements of Argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_57openalex-snapshot
An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0462-5openalex-snapshot
Handbook of Philosophical Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-1166-xopenalex-snapshot
A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-aopenalex-snapshot
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90103-5openalex-snapshot
How to reason defeasibly
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-xopenalex-snapshot
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2005.07.002openalex-snapshot
Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009openalex-snapshot
Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(01)00071-6openalex-snapshot
A logic-based theory of deductive arguments☆☆This is an extended version of a paper entitled “Towards a logic-based theory of argumentation” published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'2000), Austin, TX, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(96)00040-9openalex-snapshot
Semantics and complexity of abduction from default theories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(96)00041-0openalex-snapshot
Abstract argumentation systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068403001674openalex-snapshot
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014490210693openalex-snapshot
A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016757315265openalex-snapshot
Representing Epistemic Uncertainty by Means of Dialectical Argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024787301515openalex-snapshot
A Dialogue Game Protocol for Agent Purchase Negotiations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900openalex-snapshot
Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/13.3.347openalex-snapshot
Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/13.3.429openalex-snapshot
Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icmas.2000.858428openalex-snapshot
Modelling dialogues using argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1329125.1329417openalex-snapshot
A generative inquiry dialogue system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/200836.200838openalex-snapshot
The complexity of logic-based abduction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036514408openalex-snapshot
Dialogue Models for Inquiry and Transaction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5555/1402383.1402447openalex-snapshot
Using enthymemes in an inquiry dialogue system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-4477openalex-snapshot
Informal logic: a handbook for critical argumentation
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81197-6_37openalex-snapshot
Exploring Reasoning Schemes: A Dataset for Syllogism Figure Identification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_24openalex-snapshot
Towards a Sound and Complete Dialogue System for Handling Enthymemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04587-4_7openalex-snapshot
Completing Structured Arguments in Assumption-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_6openalex-snapshot
Representing and Reasoning About Arguments Mined from Texts and Dialogues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_10openalex-snapshot
Argument Mining: A Machine Learning Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59569-6_9openalex-snapshot
Enriching Argumentative Texts with Implicit Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_9openalex-snapshot
Multi-criteria Argument Selection in Persuasion Dialogues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-025-09692-xopenalex-snapshot
An introduction to computational argumentation research from a human argumentation perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103236openalex-snapshot
Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103470openalex-snapshot
Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2012.08.003openalex-snapshot
A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.09.002openalex-snapshot
Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.06.014openalex-snapshot
Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2023.108963openalex-snapshot
Automatic knowledge generation for a persuasion dialogue system with enthymemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20515openalex-snapshot
Understanding Enthymemes in Deductive Argumentation Using Semantic Distance Measures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11758openalex-snapshot
Synthesizing Argumentation Frameworks from Examples
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1613/jair.5436openalex-snapshot
Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Characterisation and Complexity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p19-1459openalex-snapshot
Probing Neural Network Comprehension of Natural Language Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w16-28openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w16-2804openalex-snapshot
Contextual stance classification of opinions: A step towards enthymeme reconstruction in online reviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/27openalex-snapshot
Towards an Enthymeme-Based Communication Framework in Multi-Agent Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-325openalex-snapshot
Enthymeme Construction in Dialogues using Shared Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-339openalex-snapshot
Assigning Likelihoods to Interlocutors' Beliefs and Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-210010openalex-snapshot
Yes, no, maybe, I don’t know: Complexity and application of abstract argumentation with incomplete knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aic-220133openalex-snapshot
Reasoning and interaction for social artificial intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2012070102openalex-snapshot
Can AI Models Capture Natural Language Argumentation?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1603.08789openalex-snapshot
Using Enthymemes to Fill the Gap between Logical Argumentation and Revision of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2106.10832openalex-snapshot
Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 2.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2401.09444openalex-snapshot
Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 4
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5555/2034396.2034400openalex-snapshot
Multi-criteria argument selection in persuasion dialogues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5555/3091125.3091399openalex-snapshot
Uttering Only What is Needed: Enthymemes in Multi-Agent Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.65109/gvzg4576openalex-snapshot
Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.