On the public citation graph

Balancing Rights and Interests: Reconstructing the Asymmetry Thesis

https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa051
0 signed · 11 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4823874openalex-extracted
Sechs Alternativen zur Verhältnismäßigkeitsprüfung in der Grundrechtsdogmatik (Six Alternatives to the Proportionality Test in Fundamental Rights Adjudication)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21086-1_36-1openalex-snapshot
Die Abwägung von Rechtsprinzipien
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-023-09946-5openalex-snapshot
Rights and Practical Reasoning: A Practical View on the Specificationism vs Generalism Debate
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00761-1openalex-snapshot
A default framework for fundamental rights impact assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009230322.016openalex-snapshot
Judicial Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1352325223000186openalex-snapshot
Proportionality, Comparability, and Parity: A Discussion on the Rationality of Balancing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2023.2206822openalex-snapshot
Towards an action-guiding theory of human rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12374openalex-snapshot
Conflicts of Rights and Action‐Guidingness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-57-348-371openalex-snapshot
TYPES OF LEGAL NORMS OPERATION IN TIME
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/e905329cz233fz4a7cz9a68z881fb95646a0openalex-snapshot
La complétude des normes juridiques : contribution à l'analyse du problème de l'individuation en droit
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.71112/9sz1rs96openalex-snapshot
La legitimidad epistemológica del poder punitivo en el estado constitucional: verdad procesal, prueba y control de la discrecionalidad judicial
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.