On the public citation graph

Polarization in multidisciplinary perspective

https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae425
0 signed · 31 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2362366openalex-snapshot
Putting the affect into affective polarisation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650openalex-snapshot
The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae286openalex-snapshot
Explanations of and interventions against affective polarization cannot afford to ignore the power of ingroup norm perception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae303openalex-snapshot
Descriptive norms can “backfire” in hyper-polarized contexts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae307openalex-snapshot
Moral wiggle room and group favoritism among political partisans
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae309openalex-snapshot
Morality and political economy from the vantage point of economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae310openalex-snapshot
Affective polarization is uniformly distributed across American States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae313openalex-snapshot
Understanding reaction to corporate activism: The moderating role of polarization
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae324openalex-snapshot
Why partisans feel hated: Distinct static and dynamic relationships with animosity meta-perceptions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae358openalex-snapshot
Testing the social pressure hypothesis: Does in-party social pressure reduce out-party empathy?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae368openalex-snapshot
Incentivizing news consumption on social media platforms using large language models and realistic bot accounts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae393openalex-snapshot
How rational inference about authority debunking can curtail, sustain, or spread belief polarization
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae394openalex-snapshot
Positive beliefs about cross-partisan empathy can strengthen Americans’ support for democracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae395openalex-snapshot
Attraction to politically extreme users on social media
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae407openalex-snapshot
Toward building deliberative digital media: From subversion to consensus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae413openalex-snapshot
Measuring norm pluralism and perceived polarization in US politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae426openalex-snapshot
Unraveling polarization: Insights into individual and collective dynamics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12717openalex-snapshot
How Norms Shape the Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034openalex-snapshot
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4701openalex-snapshot
Hate Trumps Love: The Impact of Political Polarization on Social Preferences

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4649792openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104885openalex-snapshot
Social norms: Enforcement, breakdown & polarization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf184openalex-snapshot
How opinion variation among in-groups can skew perceptions of ideological polarization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1103/5lwq-2n8mopenalex-snapshot
Polarization in increasingly connected societies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2024-0120openalex-snapshot
Risk equivalent safe operating space as an inclusive framework for living resource management in a multisectoral, multicultural world
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2026-0012openalex-snapshot
A Human-Centered Approach to Understanding Citizens’ Responses to Public Communication Challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.9996openalex-snapshot
(Micro)Identities in Flux: The Interplay of Polarization and Fragmentation in Polish and European Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7034778openalex-snapshot
The Language of Polarization: Hate Trumps Cooperation and Generosity Across Political Lines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7390245openalex-snapshot
Partisan Misperception in Knowledge Gap and Biased Information Processing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.65864/5kk2z6bhbropenalex-snapshot
Pluralism Breeds Tolerance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.65864/qm9asidtr3openalex-snapshot
Divided We Act: The Role of Social Sanctions in a Polarized World
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.