On the public citation graph

Political Justice?: Perceptions of Politicization and Public Preferences Toward the Supreme Court Appointment Process

https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr032
0 signed · 79 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123403000243openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court and the US Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013037915485openalex-snapshot
Judicial Behavior and Public Opinion: Popular Expectations Regarding the Factors That Influence Supreme Court Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00025openalex-snapshot
Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00518.xopenalex-snapshot
Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media's Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00407.xopenalex-snapshot
The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00432.xopenalex-snapshot
Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00362.xopenalex-snapshot
Confirmation Politics and The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830602.133openalex-snapshot
APPENDIX C. The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2111585openalex-snapshot
The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2132111openalex-snapshot
Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2585668openalex-snapshot
On the Legitimacy of National High Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053081openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical Investigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/846107openalex-snapshot
The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-4133openalex-snapshot
Congress as public enemy: public attitudes toward American political institutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-4727openalex-snapshot
Crafting law on the Supreme Court: the collegial game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-4901openalex-snapshot
Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2370857openalex-extracted
Do Policy Messengers Matter? Majority Opinion Writers as Policy Cues in Public 'Buy In' of Supreme Court Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3917007openalex-extracted
The Minimal Costs of Court Curbing: Experimental Evidence from the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4762050openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-535-5_8openalex-snapshot
Openness of Constitutional Review: A Comparative Analysis of How Transparency is Ensured in Ex Ante Constitutional Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9398-4openalex-snapshot
Snap Judgment: Implicit Perceptions of a (Political) Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09966-2openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Descriptive Representation on Support for Judicial Nominees and the US Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00204-7openalex-snapshot
Die Besetzung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754openalex-snapshot
Curbing the Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.001openalex-snapshot
The Guardians of Judicial Independence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.002openalex-snapshot
Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.003openalex-snapshot
A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.004openalex-snapshot
General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.005openalex-snapshot
Specific Policy Disagreement and Support for Court-Curbing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.006openalex-snapshot
Partisan Polarization and Support for Court-Curbing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.007openalex-snapshot
Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.008openalex-snapshot
Reconsidering the Public Foundations of Judicial Independence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.009openalex-snapshot
References
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979754.010openalex-snapshot
Index
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/als.2026.10048openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Judicial Legitimacy: A Process-Based Perspective from Malaysian Corruption Trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2022.13openalex-snapshot
The Costs of Policy Legitimation: A Test of the Political Capital Hypothesis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2022.17openalex-snapshot
The Effect of State Supreme Court Selection Method on Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.6openalex-snapshot
The Political Determinants of Public Support for Obstruction of Supreme Court Nominees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2026.10029openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court’s Partisan Composition Affects How Americans Evaluate Nominees: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2019.22openalex-snapshot
The Normative and Material Foundations of Judicial Confidence in Bolivia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.59openalex-snapshot
Descriptive representation and public support for Supreme Court nominees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123419000383openalex-snapshot
How Political Contestation Over Judicial Nominations Polarizes Americans’ Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s000842392300063xopenalex-snapshot
Erosion of International Organizations’ Legitimacy under Superpower Rivalry: Evidence on the International Court of Justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-024-00524-yopenalex-snapshot
Effects of public concerns on favorable attitudes to pandemic containment policies: a two-wave panel survey study in Hong Kong
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2017.1356253openalex-snapshot
The Dynamics of Legitimacy Change for the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2022.2143303openalex-snapshot
Emerging Hardball Confirmation Tactics and Public Support for the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/682149openalex-snapshot
Politicization and the Two Modes of Evaluating Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/712649openalex-snapshot
Public Support for Judicial Philosophies: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/715547openalex-snapshot
How State Judicial Selection Methods May Influence Views of US Supreme Court Nominees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf064openalex-snapshot
Ideological Cues, Partisanship, and Prejudice Against LGBTQ Judges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu036openalex-snapshot
Ideology, the Affordable Care Act Ruling, and Supreme Court Legitimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw046openalex-snapshot
Public Opinion on the US Supreme Court, 1973–2015
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-09-2022-0200openalex-snapshot
Between politics and bureaucracy: a systematic literature review on the dynamics of public appointments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020323openalex-snapshot
“Siri, how long should this offender stay in prison?” Considerations about the use of algorithms for judgments in criminal proceedings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12617openalex-snapshot
All the President's Justices? The Impact of Presidential Copartisanship on Supreme Court Job Approval
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00616.xopenalex-snapshot
On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12154openalex-snapshot
Lawyers' Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court: Is the Court a “Political” Institution?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12219openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Public Sentiment on Supreme Court Opinion Clarity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70022openalex-snapshot
Promoting a Diverse Bench: An Analysis of Elite Messaging About Descriptive Representation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12579openalex-snapshot
Judicial reasoning, individual cultural types, and support for COVID‐19 vaccine mandates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12732openalex-snapshot
Negative Media Coverage of the Supreme Court: The Interactive Role of Opinion Language, Coalition Size, and Ideological Signals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12820openalex-snapshot
Public Views of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Aftermath of the Kavanaugh Confirmation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13407openalex-snapshot
Breaking the bank: Personal financial interests of Supreme Court justices and institutional legitimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70158openalex-snapshot
Rules for Thee, Not for Me: Mass Attitudes on Judge Shopping
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70201openalex-snapshot
Not all Policy Losses Are the Same: How Judge–Public Co‐Partisanship Shapes Public Perceptions of the Court following a Judicial Policy Loss
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00174openalex-snapshot
Public Opinion & the Supreme Court: The Puzzling Case of Abortion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231152769openalex-snapshot
Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/01925121241304390openalex-snapshot
Understanding individual preferences over political appointees: Evidence from a conjoint experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917695229openalex-snapshot
How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221092781openalex-snapshot
Motivated Reasoning and Attitudes Towards Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings: Evidence from Five Nominations and an Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221094877openalex-snapshot
Political Hearings Reinforce Legal Norms: Confirmation Hearings and Views of the United States Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129241239612openalex-snapshot
How the Intensity of Preference for Ideological Judges Influences Court Support
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129241286891openalex-snapshot
Democratizing U.S. Courts: Perceived Representation and Support for Judicial Elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129251350143openalex-snapshot
Judging Judicial Nominees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261430838openalex-snapshot
Communicating the Politics of the Law: Legal and Legislative Rhetoric About High Court Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261465675openalex-snapshot
Depictions of Partisan Bias at Oral Argument and Public Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x241263080openalex-snapshot
Friendship is Rare: The Influence of Off-Bench Friendships on Support for the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2478/acpo-2025-0001openalex-snapshot
Separate opinions in the constitutional jurisdictions of the Baltic States: Applicants and politicization of judgments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101744openalex-snapshot
Increasing Vaccination: Psychological Characteristics of COVID-19 Vaccine Advocates, Converts, and Resisters in Hong Kong
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.