On the public citation graph

Nanoscientists and political involvement: Which characteristics make scientists more likely to support engagement in political debates?

0 signed · 84 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6076-2openalex-snapshot

Nanotechnology – Toxicological Issues and Environmental Safety and Environmental Safety

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1168-6openalex-snapshot

Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020: Retrospective and Outlook

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1168-6_5openalex-snapshot

Nanotechnology Environmental, Health, and Safety Issues

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9openalex-snapshot

Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-2336-5openalex-snapshot

Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2openalex-snapshot

The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-007-9266-yopenalex-snapshot

Refining search terms for nanotechnology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9671-5openalex-snapshot

Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0012-4openalex-snapshot

Seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media messages, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9621-1openalex-snapshot

The Convergence of Virtual Reality and Social Networks: Threats to Privacy and Autonomy

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9637-1openalex-snapshot

Scientists’ Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001openalex-snapshot

How science makes environmental controversies worse

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006openalex-snapshot

Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.005openalex-snapshot

Satisfaction with treatment decision-making and treatment regret among Latinas and non-Latina whites with DCIS

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511818110openalex-snapshot

The Honest Broker

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19openalex-snapshot

On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016956openalex-snapshot

A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/526317aopenalex-snapshot

Policy advice: Use experts wisely

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.392openalex-snapshot

Scientists worry about some risks more than the public

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.361openalex-snapshot

Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.265openalex-snapshot

Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.191openalex-snapshot

Science policy considerations for responsible nanotechnology decisions

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020354.xopenalex-snapshot

Sustainability and the Scientist’s Burden

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317516111openalex-snapshot

Science communication as political communication

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932046.0000openalex-snapshot

The public, the media and agricultural biotechnology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/15.3.300openalex-snapshot

Pathways to Political Participation? Religion, Communication Contexts, and Mass Media

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj015openalex-snapshot

An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur040openalex-snapshot

Evidence-Based Practice and the Use of Information in State Agency Decision Making

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs084openalex-snapshot

Understanding shifting perceptions of nanotechnologies and their implications for policy dialogues about emerging technologies

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sor024openalex-snapshot

The Impact of Race and Ethnicity, Immigration and Political Context on Participation in American Electoral Politics

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00057openalex-snapshot

Religious Institutions and Political Participation in America

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020openalex-snapshot

The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.203034openalex-snapshot

Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8401005openalex-snapshot

Have Americans' Attitudes Become More Polarized?—An Update*

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.xopenalex-snapshot

Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00639.xopenalex-snapshot

Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00533.xopenalex-snapshot

Faith and Politics: The Influence of Religious Beliefs on Political Participation*

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.xopenalex-snapshot

Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.xopenalex-snapshot

The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power1

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009openalex-snapshot

The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12036openalex-snapshot

The Current Status and Future Direction of Nanotechnology Regulations: A View from Nano‐scientists

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5323.163openalex-snapshot

Raiders of the Last Bastion?

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.299.5609.977openalex-snapshot

Public Engagement with Science

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa7477openalex-snapshot

Bridging the opinion gap

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01989-15openalex-snapshot

Scientists: Engage the Public!

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200109openalex-snapshot

Political policy and persuasion: the role of communications from political leaders

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398400900109openalex-snapshot

Advisory Committees in OSHA and EPA: Their Use in Regulatory Decisionmaking

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509347815openalex-snapshot

From enabling technology to applications: The evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511417936openalex-snapshot

Factors influencing public risk–benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512459315openalex-snapshot

Predicting scientists’ participation in public life

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400404openalex-snapshot

Political Participation: Does Religion Matter?

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103openalex-snapshot

The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005278347openalex-snapshot

Trying to Relate

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x9202000106openalex-snapshot

Church Participation and Political Participation

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691209753openalex-snapshot

Science as Social Knowledge

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.2.289openalex-snapshot

Religion among Academic Scientists: Distinctions, Disciplines, and Demographics

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439680openalex-snapshot

Censoring government scientists and the role of consensus in science advice

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.15779/z38bc3wopenalex-snapshot

Sciene Plays Defense: Natural Resource Management in the Bush Administration

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0010:atdisa]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot

After the Divorce: Improving Science at Federal Wildlife Agencies

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17226/12598openalex-snapshot

Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1787/5js33l1jcpwb-enopenalex-snapshot

Scientific Advice for Policy Making

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1956018openalex-snapshot

Effects of Public Opinion on Policy

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2067064openalex-snapshot

Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and their Parents.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2073498openalex-snapshot

Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2647555openalex-snapshot

Race, Ethnicity, and Political Participation: Competing Models and Contrasting Explanations

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2655098openalex-snapshot

What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3341230openalex-snapshot

Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/442541openalex-snapshot

Policy and Administration

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7openalex-snapshot

Voice and Equality

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3152/030234212x13113405157822openalex-snapshot

Classifying US nano-scientists: Of cautious innovators, regulators, and technology optimists

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211x13176484436014openalex-snapshot

Perceptions and actions: relationships of views on risk with citation actions of nanotechnology scientists

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3395/reciis.v2i2.852openalex-snapshot

Shaping Science and Technology Policy: the next generation of research

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v13i.4475openalex-snapshot

Resident Physician Attitudes and Competence About Obesity Treatment: Need for Improved Education

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3885/meo.2008.res00257openalex-snapshot

Resident Physician Attitudes and Competence About Obesity Treatment: Need for Improved Education

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346328openalex-snapshot

Science and Politics: An A-to-Z Guide to Issues and Controversies

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661773openalex-snapshot

The Perception of Risk

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-4501openalex-snapshot

The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-3597openalex-snapshot

Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-4156openalex-snapshot

Civic engagement in American democracy

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3033366openalex-extracted

A Review of Contemporary Science and Technology Policy Research: Recent Trends and Future Directions

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-018-0316-yopenalex-snapshot

Models of Public Engagement: Nanoscientists’ Understandings of Science–Society Interactions

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy039openalex-snapshot

From pure science to participatory knowledge production? Researchers’ perceptions on science–policy interface in bioenergy policy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221122285openalex-snapshot

A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2024.26.87497openalex-snapshot

Desafíos de la investigación nanomédica en México

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.