Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository
metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is
labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not
evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
O PROCESSO CIVIL INTERNACIONAL NO CPC/2015 E OS PRINCÍPIOS ALI/UNIDROIT DO PROCESSO CIVIL TRANSNACIONAL: UMA ANÁLISE DE CONSONÂNCIA DA HARMONIZAÇÃO PROCESSUAL
European Small Claims Procedure and European Order for Payment Procedure: Translation with the Commentary (Науково-практичний коментар до цивільного процесуального законодавства ЄС: перші загальноєвропейські процедури розгляду і вирішення цивільних і комерційних справ транскордонного характеру -…
HACIA EL ACCESO TRANSNACIONAL A LA JUSTICIA: UN ANÁLISIS DE LA CONSONANCIA ENTRE LOS PRINCIPIOS TRANSJUS Y EL CÓDIGO DE PROCESO CIVIL BRASILEÑO CPC/2015
L'égalité des armes dans le contentieux privé international. Étude des règles de compétence en droit judiciaire européen
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.